Learning Team Deliverable-Week 3 Learning Team-C Tina Johnson‚ Nicola Phillips-Tate‚ Latrina Taylor‚ and Suzane Tenorio University of Phoenix HRM/552-Organizational Training and Development Sherri Johnson December 1‚ 2014 Learning Team Deliverable- Week 3 The assignment for this week focuses on the team’s understanding of the goals and objectives of training program development and delivery. Team C summarizes the following highlights of this week’s discussions: determining organizational development
Premium Management Apprenticeship Employment
Learning Team Reflection Week 3 Ian Adams‚ Evelyn Hunter‚ Maria Palakunnel‚ Jasmine Simmons FIN/571 October 26‚ 2014 Richard Vermeer Learning Team Reflection Week 3 Allen Litchman and Laura Trust a husband and wife who worked both worked for corporate firms purchased the Finagle A Bagel business in 1988 in order to relinquish themselves from having to work for others. They have consistently made good decisions and consequently have expanded the business to multiple locations. The team spoke about
Premium Time Term Corporate finance
Learning Team D Week 3 Reflection ECO 561 August 25‚ 2014 Learning Team D discussed the objectives for week 3. Each Team Member posted a response in regards to topics they felt comfortable with‚ any topics they struggled with‚ and how the topics relate to their field. The areas we discussed were: Production Costs and Revenues‚ Monopolistic Competition‚ Innovation and Technology‚ Determinant of Supply‚ and the Regulation of Monopoly. The following is a compilation of Learning Team D’s opinions
Premium Perfect competition Economics Monopoly
Learning Team Deliverable BCOM/275 November 3‚ 2014 Dr. Timothy Williams Learning Team Deliverable Credibility is the most important part of the group’s discussion last week. The members of the team agreed that credible sources must have a backup make a valid argument otherwise an argument or claims could become an opinion or an invalid argument. One disadvantage of not having credible information is it could tarnish one’s reputation and mistrust from audiences. Once the information has been
Free Critical thinking
created the cognitive dissonance theory as an attempt to explain why people desire to have consistency between their behaviors and actions. Cognitive dissonance is the distressing mental state people feel when they find themselves doing things that don’t fit with what they know‚ or having opinions that do not fit with other opinions they hold (Festinger‚ 1957; as cited in Griffin‚ 2009). Thus‚ people are motivated to change either their behavior or their belief when feelings of dissonance arise.
Premium Cognitive dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance is a psychological discomfort caused by inconsistency among a person’s belief‚ attitudes‚ and or actions. There are three hypotheses that explain the theory. The first hypothesis is selective exposure which is the tendency to avoid information inconsistent with one’s belief and attitudes. One only accepts information that is consistent with their own thoughts. Hypothesis two is post-decision dissonance; which are close call decisions and can affect a decision one makes. And
Premium Cognition Cognitive dissonance Psychology
Excuse making is part of your auto-pilot meta-programming. In fact‚ excuses are red flags‚ revealing what you TRULY believe‚ what your most closely held TRUTHS and beliefs are. The reason we make excuses is called cognitive dissonance in psychology. Cognitive dissonance is when our behavior and actions conflict with our attitudes and beliefs. According to Saul McLeod‚ in Simply Psychology‚ “It is the feeling of discomfort leading to an alteration in one of the attitudes‚ beliefs or behaviors to
Premium Thought Psychology Feeling
The cognitive dissonance theory states that if there is a discrepancy – an aversive emotional state – between our beliefs and behaviors‚ we are likely to experience inconsistency between these two cognitions. For instance‚ if you smoke‚ despite knowing that smoking is harmful‚ then this may result in cognitive dissonance. Furthermore‚ the college students who put themselves through hazing to join a fraternity could be another example. These students also most likely to experience cognitive dissonance
Premium Alcoholism Addiction Drug addiction
What is cognitive dissonance and the art of persuasion‚ where attitudes‚ emotions‚ and ethics play a factor in persuading an employee as to the characteristics of theoretical work situations. So‚ what is intellectual disagreement‚ the state of having unpredictable thoughts‚ theories‚ or arrogances‚ especially as relating to social choices and defiance change. Cognitive dissonance causes an ill feeling of uncertainty which in turns leads to unexpected modifications to one or more of the following:
Premium Cognition Cognitive dissonance Psychology
Theory Paper on Cognitive Dissonance Theory “Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief‚ the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable‚ called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief‚ they will rationalize‚ ignore and even deny anything that doesn ’t fit in with the core belief.” ― Frantz Fanon‚ Black Skin‚ White
Premium Cognition Cognitive dissonance