Experiment #1: Introduction to Experimentation Submitted by: Neann Klara M. De Jesus BS Psychology II Submitted to: Dr. Geraldine E. Tria ABSTRACT SUMMARY The first experiment done by the class was called “Introduction to Experimentation”. Its main objective is to give basic knowledge about some of the logic of experimentation. The class was divided into groups of 2. In each group there was an experimenter (E) and a subject (S). The experimenter instructed
Premium Experiment Stanford prison experiment Theory
brand of glue * The type of surface Dependent Variable: * The strength of the glue Controlled Variables: * Same amount of glue (one swipe) * Same amount of time to dry * Same person conducting experiment * Same time of day * Same amount of experiments * Same Net Weight (21g) * Same brand of surfaces * Same person timing (Jet) * Same time and place of investigation * Same length of surface Plan Aim: To see which brands of glues stick the
Premium Stick Experiment Orders of magnitude
The aim of this experiment was to investigate the role of organization in learning of meaningful words. It was like a memory test‚ through which one could conclude how organization helps in strengthening memory. Memory refers to the processes that are used to acquire ‚ store‚ retain and later retrieve information. There are three major processes involved in memory: Encoding‚ storage and retrieval. Encoding or registration(receiving‚ processing and combining of received information) Storage(creation
Premium Memory Cognitive psychology Psychology
- Quasi Experimental Design: If the researcher lacks control over the assignment of participants to conditions and does not manipulate the causal variable of interest‚ the design is quasi experimental. o Quasi Experiments do not have internal validity because participants are not randomly assigned to conditions and the researcher may have no control over the independent variable. - Basic Confounds in Quasi Experimental Design are : o History o Maturation (Emotional‚ Physical & Psychological)
Premium Experiment Statistics Causality
Introduction In my report I will discuss what I did as an experiment and what I hope for it to achieve. Firstly I carried out an experiment to assay the effectiveness that a range of disinfectants have on the growth of ecoli and whether or not it can prevent it from growing. From the experiment i should be able to see that some disinfectants have a greater effect than others do. From this I shall then draw a conclusion and evaluation on what was the most effective‚ and could there have been any
Premium Growth medium Agar plate Petri dish
if this medicine cures the disease. All of these cases relate to decision making. We cannot reach a conclusion in these examples unless we have access to data. Data can be obtained from observational studies‚ experiments‚ or surveys. This article is devoted mainly to controlled experiments. However‚ it also explains observational studies and how they differ from surveys. Suppose two diets‚ Diet 1 and Diet 2‚ are being promoted by two different companies and each of these companies claims that
Premium Experiment Scientific method Nutrition
Should we use animals for experiments? (against) The question is‚what it means to use animals for experiments? It means‚ the investigators and doctors whose are producing medicines they have to test is first‚somehow‚to see how is the effect of the medicine.This “somehow” means the animals.Moreover I haven’t said anything about testing new products like cosmetic products‚make-ups‚sprays. In my opinion‚the animals are different‚they body and organism are different.For this reason the scientists
Premium Pain Animal The Animals
Part I - Illumination Experiments (1924-27) These experiments were performed to find out the effect of different levels of illumination (lighting) on productivity of labour. The brightness of the light was increased and decreased to find out the effect on the productivity of the test group. Surprisingly‚ the productivity increased even when the level of illumination was decreased. It was concluded that factors other than light were also important. Part II - Relay Assembly Test Room Study (1927-1929)
Free Light Lighting Experiment
as humans‚ or the study of psychology)‚ and how does the study relate to previous work in the area? What are the theoretical hypothesis tested‚ and how were they derived? (APA‚ 1994) You must actually read the studies to be able to answer these questions! It seems like common sense but many students try to write their IA without ever having completely read the background studies! First Start out broad. Identify the particular aspect of the discipline of psychology in which your study took place
Premium Statistical hypothesis testing Hypothesis Null hypothesis
The Failure to Escape Traumatic Shock In May of 1967 Martin Seligman and Steven Maier conducted a research Called “Failure to escape traumatic shock”. This experiment involved three groups of dogs. Each group of dogs had a different purpose. Group one was the control group and did not receive a shock. Group two received a shock but was able stop the halter from shocking them by pressing a button. Group three was shocked and was not able to stop the shock‚ they were forced to wait for group two
Premium Shock Experiment Scientific control