Inbound logistics for the Pepsi and Coca Cola consisted of largely the same operations. Both companies purchase their own ingredients through use of future contracts (to avoid market volatility) and produce their concentrate from their own facilities. Once this is done‚ these companies send their concentrate out to bottlers upon approval of contract for bottling company. Once the bottling company receives the shipment of concentration‚ it is diluted to the correct concentration by adding the correct
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Pepsi
dy Managerial Economics Coke vs. Pepsi: An Economic Analysis Rebecca Simmons Managerial Economics Dr Sol Drescher December 4‚ 2012 Executive Summary In this case study we will do an economic analysis of two major competitors; Coke® and Pepsi®. We will look at the history of these to competitive giants and discuss how they have evolved over the years to become rivals in the 21st Century. In this case study we
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
CASE NO. 11:- Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines Inc. 1. Stakeholders 1.1. The five-year girl and the injured: - as because of this incident a five year girl lost her life and nothing is more precious that life. 1.2. Customers: - because people were resting their futures in the hands of this number fever promotion campaign. 1.3. Victoria Angelo‚ her family and families like hers: - these people who didn’t have enough money to eat were buying Pepsi in the hope of changing their whole life. The rich
Premium Decision making Pepsi Ethics
Case 1-3 Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India 1. As far as I am concerned‚ there are three specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles: 1) As mentioned in the case‚ Indian government viewed as unfriendly to foreign investors. Outside investment had been allowed only in high-tech sectors and was almost entirely prohibited in consumer goods sectors. 2) Based on Indian laws‚ outside investment cannot use their original brand name. For Coca-Cola‚ they attempted
Premium Coca-Cola Soft drink Marketing
Internal Analysis of Coke and Pepsi (Appendix A) In this session‚ we would analyze Coke and Pepsi internally using SWOT analysis. SWOT is the short form of Strengths‚ Weaknesses‚ Opportunities and Threats. In Appendix A‚ we can see that the major strength for Coke is its name value. Coke is the World’s leading brand for CSD. Marketing and advertising is the major battleground for the CSD industry‚ from the SWOT analysis‚ we can see Coke did a great job for that. Being the market leader is definitely
Premium Coca-Cola Caffeine
advantage of early timing and entered the market as "Pepsi Foods Ltd." as a joint venture company with two local partners; Voltas and Punjab Agro. During the crisis with the contaminated water‚ Pepsi and Coca-Cola were both under fire with the consumers and government. Politicians made it exceptionally difficult for both companies to redeem themselves with the facts they had. Coca-Cola seemed to have a more difficult come-back than Pepsi. Some of these effects may have been anticipated
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Pepsi Case SWOT ANALYSIS Strengths: The strategy that PepsiCo is currently taking is a major strength in getting the attention of its targeted market which is the young eco-friendly generation for the fallowing. · Community focused. · Shows they care about their consumers. · Makes consumers feel good about buying their product. Weaknesses: Even though the new strategy seems to be working thus far there are weakness that could be detrimental to PepsiCo’success. Such as. s · Not spending
Premium Marketing Coca-Cola Advertising
PRODUCT REPORT ’’ Crystal Pepsi Prepared by Yeo & Ong March 5‚ 2009 There was a marketing fad in early 1990s equating clarity with purity. Just to name a few‚ Miller Brewing Co. came up with Miller Clear(March 1993)‚ Coors Brewing Co. came up with Zima Clearmalt (1992)‚ Procter & Gamble came up with Ivory clear liquid hand cleanser and Colgate-Palmolive came up with Clear Sparkling fresh dishwashing liquid. Last but not least‚ PepsiCo came up with Crystal Pepsi in April 1992. Company Brief
Premium Pepsi Cola Coca-Cola
Have you ever wondered if the sugar content in Coke and Pepsi has altered you or your friends preference? In this experiment‚ we tested to see if the sugar content changes peoples preference over Coke and Pepsi. We chose this experiment because we would like to see how people change their opinions of their favorite soda‚ after we have informed them of the sugar content. This experiment of Coke vs Pepsi is tied into chemistry by the percentage of the compound/sugar in each can of soda. Background
Premium Coca-Cola Diet Coke Thums Up
Spring 09 Pepsi & Coke 08 Fall In May‚ 1886‚ Coca Cola was introduced by John Pemberton a pharmacist from Atlanta‚ Georgia. John Pemberton started brewing his coca cola formula in a three legged brass kettle in his backyard. Pharmacists Caleb Bradham in New Bern‚ North Carolina first made competitor Pepsi in the 1890’s. The brand was trademarked on June 16‚ 1903. These companies have brand identification and customer loyalties that have made them a historical landmark. Today Pepsi and Coke
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing Soft drink