According to Schneider‚ Elliot‚ LoBiondo-Wood & Haber (2004)‚ qualitative research methods‚ search for the meaning and understanding of human experiences in a naturalistic setting. A researcher obtains subjective facts in order to explore the experiences of each participant (Schneider‚ Elliot‚ LoBiondo-Wood & Haber 2004). As a result‚ qualitative research is a means in which a researcher gains an insight into the participant’s point of view concerning their personal experiences; in order gain an
Premium Qualitative research Research methods
critique a qualitative study? Powers (2011a) states‚ “All scientific evidence is important to clinical decision making‚ and all evidence must be critically appraised to determine its contribution to that decision making” (p. 135). A qualitative study attempts to describe an experience from the participant’s perspective. Additionally‚ to enhance understanding‚ the objective of a qualitative study is to increase awareness of human experiences. Performing a critical appraisal of qualitative research requires
Premium Scientific method Quantitative research Qualitative research
Qualitative Research Assignment 1. Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research ? Yes. In the article‚ the aim of the research was to understand the experience of participants‚ their knowledge about type 2 diabetes‚ and the factors of medication adherence in Malaysia. According to Susan (2010)‚ the five components of PICOT are population‚ issue‚ context‚ outcome‚ and time. According to Al-Qazaz et al (2011)‚ the PICOT was presented by the researcher in the study were‚ P: Type 2diabetes
Premium Qualitative research Scientific method Data analysis
identify the strengths and weaknesses of the research article and demonstrate knowledge and understanding of research methodology. The title of the above article reflects its contents and is easy to interpret‚ as Caldwell‚ Henshaw and Taylor (2005) concur ‘the title should be clear and allow the reader to easily interpret its contents‚ an inaccurate title can confuse the reader. But it was a bit too long‚ as Polit et al (2000)‚ claims that research reports begin with a title that succinctly conveys
Premium Research Qualitative research Scientific method
Critical Appraisal Charlene Clark Loewenberg School of Nursing Abstract The purpose of this critical appraisal is to review a particular recent research article with appropriate implication to nursing practice of the article comparing two acute migraine treatment modalities intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan (Kostic‚ Gutierrez‚ Rieg‚ Moore‚ & Gendron‚ 2010). Critical Appraisal Title and Abstract The title “A prospective‚ randomized
Premium
Appraisal 1 Critical Appraisal by Gemekia C. Parker A Paper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for NU 608 EBP & Quality Improvement in Health Care Systems University of South Alabama College of Nursing Fall 2010 Appraisal 2 Introduction Critical appraisal is the process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity‚ results‚ and relevance. (Hill‚ 2001) Critical appraisal of research is preformed
Premium Evidence-based medicine Dieting Randomized controlled trial
Research Critique‚ Part 1 Grand Canyon University: NUR 433V March 15‚ 2015 Introduction Critical appraisal of a research study demonstrates an understanding of the research study being conducted. This paper will review a qualitative research study designed to explore the lived experience of lay presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in primary and secondary environments of care from a healthcare provider’s (HCP) perspective. The in-depth critical appraisal will
Premium Qualitative research Quantitative research
purpose of this report is to conduct a critical appraisal of a published article. Carnwell (1997) describes a critical appraisal as an unbiased and balanced scrutiny of the research paper so that both its strengths and weaknesses are highlighted. The focus of the appraisal with be on “Promoting the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; patients and their carer’s views” (Caress et al‚ 2010). The format of the appraisal will be formed around a set of criteria
Premium Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Research Qualitative research
Assessment 4 Critical Appraisal Critical appraisal article on “Quality nursing care in the words of nurses” Burhans & Alligood (2010) Journal of advance nursing 66(8). This part will be short description of author’s qualifications‚ abstract‚ literature review‚ which methods was used to reveal answer for the research questions‚ findings on six essential themes‚ discussion on responsibility and quality nursing care. The title is clearly defined as research on ‘Quality nursing care in the words of
Premium Nursing Patient Nurse
Critical appraisal is the use of explicit‚ transparent methods to assess the data in published research‚ applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity‚ adherence to reporting standards‚ conclusions and generalizability.[1][2] Critical appraisal methods form a central part of the systematic review process.[3] They are used in evidence-based healthcare training to assist clinical decision-making‚ and are increasingly used in evidence-based social care and education provision.
Premium Creativity Design Evidence-based medicine