Case Brief: R v.Shankar Citation: Regina v. Corey Shankar‚ 2007 ONCA 280 (CanLII) Facts: The accused was driving his car without the required laminated taillights when officers pulled him over late October 2004. The police asked Shankar for his licence‚ registration‚ and insurance. The accused handed over a licence in the name of Jason Singh‚ the insurance information handwritten on an informal yellow sticky note‚ and a photocopy of the vehicle registration. When inquired about the spelling of
Premium Appeal English-language films Judgment
Q.1 A particle is moving in a straight line with initial velocity u and retardation αv‚ where v is the velocity at any time t [a] the particle will cover a total distance u/α [b] the particle will come to rest after 1/α [c] the particle will continue to move for a very long time [d] the velocity of the particle will become u/2 after time 1/α Q.2 A particle moves along the xaxis as x = u(t-1)2 + a(t-3)3 [a] initial velocity of the particle is u
Premium Velocity Acceleration Kinematics
CRIMINOLOGY: R. v. Grant We can apply different theories of criminology at any time in our everyday lives as police officers. Criminology is an interdisciplinary profession built around the scientific study of crime and criminal behaviour‚ including their forms‚ causes‚ legal aspects‚ and control. In the fallowing‚ I will identify a few theories that are the essential reasoning behind the criminal in this case. The case history of R. v. Grant is that‚ Grant‚ an eighteen year old at the time
Premium Sociology Crime Criminology
Year 12 Legal Studies Crime Assessment Steven Fraser - R v Fraser - Murder of children Legal Citation: R v Fraser [2003] NSWSC 965 and R v Fraser [2004] NSWSC 53 Elements of the Offence: Steven Fraser murdered his three children – Ashley (7)‚ Ryan (5)‚ and Jarrod (4) – on the weekend of the 18 – 19 August‚ 2001. They were staying in his Caringbah apartment on a custody visit‚ where Steven was living after separating with his wife Maria Chona two months prior. Ryan and Jarrod were given doses
Premium Murder Crime Capital punishment
MILLERSBURG — Found competent to stand trial‚ outstanding motions to dismiss the charge against a Marshallville man and have the amount of bail revisited will have to wait for another day‚ one on which he can be in court with his attorney. John R. Harig Jr.‚ 36‚ of 8696 Mount Eaton Road‚ has pleaded not guilty Holmes County Common Pleas Court to a single count of intimidation‚ a third-degree felony. He has pleaded not guilty to the charge‚ which carries a potential sentence of up to three years in
Premium Ohio Ohio Felony
Statement of the Case This is a formal request for an appeal against the ruling in the case of R . v. Vaillancourt. . Mr. Vaillancourt seeks to appeal the court’s decision based on the inconsistency with s.230(d) of the Criminal Code‚ and s. 7 and 11 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is present in this case‚ evident when Vaillancourt’s accomplice does not inform him of his plan to bring weapons to the crime scene‚ leading Vaillancourt to believe that his lack of knowledge of the presence
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States Constitution
Mind‚ Brains and Programs by John R. Searle discusses the idea of AI‚ specifically Strong AI. I will argue that his comments on AI being impossible to develop are incorrect. Searle had discussed many points but thinks too low of what makes up the intentionality he supports. (47 words) John R. Searle discusses AI with several points. They can be summed up into five points. The 1st point as well as 2nd point compare living animal’s ‘intentionality’ being based on the causal features and comparing
Premium Philosophy of mind Artificial intelligence Psychology
James Donalds – Case Brief Practice R. v. Sparrow‚ [1990] 1 SCR 1075 Facts: Sparrow was charged under s. 61(1) of the Fisheries Act with the offence of fishing with a drift net longer than permitted by the terms of the Indian Food Fishing License. Sparrow admitted to committing the act‚ but claimed that he has the aboriginal right to fish under s. 31(1) of the Fisheries Act. Therefore‚ the Act is inconsistent with s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act‚ 1982 and is invalid. He was unsuccessful
Premium Law United Kingdom United States
Kevin Han Case #1: Stanford Financial R. Allen Stanford is accused of pulling off a $7 billion Ponzi scheme that defrauded thousands of investors. Prosecutors allege that Stanford lured investors to purchase Certificate of Deposits with returns that were consistently higher than the market and used the proceeds to finance his lavish lifestyle. Stanford currently faces 14 criminal charges‚ including wire and mail fraud‚ in addition to civil suit from the SEC. Adding to the case are charges against
Premium
Cassie Sanchez 7th Edward R. Murrow Edward R Murrow‚ born near Greensboro‚ North Carolina‚ April 25‚ 1908. He was the third son of the three sons. His parents were Mr. and Mrs. S. C. Murrow. His memories were of trapping rabbits‚ eating watermelons and listening to the war stories his grandfather would tell. His family moved to Washington when he was about six years old because of his mother’s health. His father was an agricultural laborer‚ brakeman on local railroad and a locomotive engineer.
Premium