Bush v. Gore‚ 531 U.S. 98 (2000)‚ is the United States Supreme Court decision that resolved the dispute surrounding the 2000 presidential election. Three days earlier‚ the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring. Eight days earlier‚ the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board‚ 531 U.S. 70 (2000). In a per curiam decision‚ the Court ruled that there was an Equal Protection Clause violation in using different standards
Premium President of the United States United States Supreme Court of the United States
" Medical Marijuana ProCon. N.p.‚ n.d. 25 Nov. 2012. Web. Gieringer‚ Dale H Drug Problems 26.2 (1999): 237-38. California National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Harris‚ Gardiner. "Researchers Find Study of Medical Marijuana Discouraged." The New York Times (2010): n Hosking‚ R. D.‚ and J. P. Zajicek. "Therapeutic Potential of Cannabis in Pain Medicine." British Journal of Anaesthesia 101.1 (2008): 59-68. British Journal of Anaesthesia May 2008. 25 Nov. 2012. Web. Washington‚ D.C.: National
Premium Cannabis Legality of cannabis by country Medical cannabis
LEGAL BASES OF PHILIPPINE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM MAJOR LEGAL BASES The Philippine Constitutions 1. 1935 CONST. Article XIV Section 5 2. 1973 CONST. Article XV Section 8 (1-8) 3. 1987 CONST. Article XIV Sections 1-5(5) THE 1987 CONSTITUTIONS Article XIV Sections 1-5(5) Section 1. The state shall protect and promote the right of all the citizens to quality education at all levels and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all. Section 2. The state shall:
Premium High school Higher education Secondary education
addressed the constitutional rights of individuals and groups. These decisions have limited as well as expanded the rights of the members of these groups. Cases such as Korematsu v. United States and Roe v. Wade are examples of the limitation and expansion of rights. The historical circumstances surrounding the case of Korematsu v. U.S. are as follows. In the 1940’s there was a strong anti-Japanese feeling throughout all of America. There was an act passed requiring all people of Japanese heritage to
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
I. Case Name: Harte-Hanks Communications Inc. v. Connaughton (1989). This civil law case refined the actual malice standard. II. Summary of Facts: In November 1983‚ Connaughton ran for the position of Municipal Judge of Hamilton‚ Ohio‚ and lost to James Dolan. Dolan resigned from the position a month later and was arrested for perjury charges. While an investigation took place‚ the Journal News ran an article quoting Alice Thompson‚ a witness‚ saying Connaughton had used his “dirty tricks” and offered
Premium Crime Freedom of speech Mass media
on weapon charges. The Riley v. California case was argued April 29‚ 2014 and decided on June 25‚ 2014.The main issue in this case was how the police officer searched his phone without a warrant then arrested him and if this action violated the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment clearly states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures…”.
Premium
Co-dependency is an issue that I see on a fairly regular basis. Mostly‚ women‚ but some men are affected by it‚ and it is defined as learned behavior that can be passed down from one generation to another. This condition involves emotional and behavioral aspects that prevent an individual from experiencing a healthy and mutually satisfying relationship. Co-dependency has also been referred to as “relationship addiction” because people who suffer from it will very often seek relationships that are
Premium Family Marriage Cohabitation
Russell v. the Queen (1882): This case fell according to the JCPC under powers in favor of the federal government. The reasoning for this case is not convincing. The reason for this is that it does not ban alcohol for the entire country‚ but instead merely restricts and regulates it. The legislation for this case could have fallen under: section 92 (9)‚ which deals with saloons‚ taverns‚ and shops; section 92 (13) which is about property and civil rights in the province; or section 92 (16) which
Premium United States Canada United States Constitution
Case Summary Union of India v. Raghubir Singh SCHOOL OF LAW CHRIST UNIVERSITY BANGALORE- 560028 2012-2013 NAME: VIVEK.K.R REGISTER NO: 1216044 CLASS: 1 BA LLB A Identification Name of the case: Union of India (UOI) and Anr. Vs. Raghubir Singh (Dead) by Lrs. Etc. Jurisdiction: Appeal From the Judgment and Order dated 06.12.1984 of the Delhi High Court in Regular First Appeal Nos. 113 and 114 of 1968. Level of the deciding Court: Supreme Court Date of decision: 16.05.1989 Equivalent
Premium Common law Jury Supreme Court of the United States
LEGAL WRITING 201 30 SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE READABILITY OR HOW TO WRITE FOR JUDGES‚ NOT LIKE JUDGES JUDGE MARK P. PAINTER OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS Legal Writing 201 JUDGE MARK P. PAINTER OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS TAFT LAW CENTER 230 EAST NINTH STREET CINCINNATI‚ OHIO 45202 513-946-3444 – FAX 946-3411 mpainter@cms.hamilton-co.org www.judgepainter.org ........................................................... Introduction to Legal Writing ...............
Premium Lawyer Judge Appellate court