testimony of his co-defendant‚ John Bryant‚ Jr.‚ to be considered against him; (5) that the Court erred in permitting the jury to separate overnight on the last day of the trial; and (6) that there were certain erroneous instructions. (Law Justia: State v. Mouzon (1957)‚ n.d.) Holding
Premium Crime Murder Capital punishment
GLOBAL RESEARCH REPORT AFRICA APRIL 2010 JONATHAN ADAMS CHRISTOPHER KING DANIEL HOOK EVIDENCE THE AUTHORS Dr. Jonathan Adams is Director‚ Research Evaluation. He was a founding Director of Evidence Ltd‚ the UK specialist on research performance analysis and interpretation. Christopher King is Editor of Science Watch (ScienceWatch.com)‚ a newsletter and web resource tracking trends and performance in basic research. Dr Daniel Hook is Managing Director of Symplectic Limited‚ the
Premium Africa
Gerstein v Pugh Parties: Gerstein Petitioner‚ Pugh: Respondent Facts: Respondent was arrested on an information (charging documeLabeling Theory and the resulting effects on children in our societynt prepared by prosecutor‚ not reviewed by grand jury or judge) and held without bond at least 30 days without a determination of probable cause. History: Respondent filed a civil suit‚ with Petitioner‚ State Attorney for Dade County‚ as defendant. District Court found for Respondent and ordered probable
Premium Law United States Appeal
weapon and later found guilty. The petitioner claimed that "stop and frisk" constituted an unreasonable search and seizure. In 1968‚ the Supreme Court established the standard for allowing police officers to perform a stop and frisk of a suspect in Terry v. Ohio case. Furthermore‚ a stop and frisk is detaining a person by law enforcement officer for the purpose of an investigation‚ accompanied by
Premium Police Crime Constable
Case 13-3: Summary: This case is about a company named Hearts ‘R Us. This company provides research and development for medical devices. According to the information provided the company is in its early stage and has no products in the market. They have developed a Heart Valve System that would be revolutionary in the market if is approved. Also there’s another company called Bionic Body that is a biological medical device company‚ they have another product that would work well with this new
Premium Stock Preferred stock Stock market
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California was a case in 1976 which the Supreme Court of California decided that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by any of their patients. Originally‚ in 1974‚ the decision was mandated warning the threatened person or persons but‚ in the year 1976 the California Supreme Court decided that it was intended for a “duty to protect” a victim. Mr. Poddar was a graduate student in the University
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Law
Case: Brandenburg V. Ohio Year: 1969 Facts: Clarence Brandenburg‚ a leader of an Ohio affiliate of the Ku Klux Klan‚ asked a reported to attend a KKK rally and cover the event. The reporter attended with a camera crew and filmed the rally that took place. Twelve white hooded figures‚ including that of Brandenburg’s‚ were seen with a wooden cross that was burned‚ and Brandenburg the said‚ “We’re not an revengent organization‚ but if our President‚ our Congress‚ and our Supreme Court‚ continues to
Premium United States Ku Klux Klan Southern United States
Internal Legal Memorandum and Analysis in Ima Shewin’s Case Taressa Wise Kaplan University PA 402-01 Professor Carolyn Dragseth June 5‚ 2012 LEGAL M E M O R A N D U M TO: Carolyn Dragseth‚ Attorney FROM: Taressa Wise‚ Legal Analyst DATE: June 5‚ 2012 RE: Legal Memorandum‚ causes of action for presenting a prima facie case for Ima Shewin
Premium Sexual harassment Discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Mark Down‚ who is 74 years old‚ made a will leaving all of his assets to his children. He also executed a power of attorney‚ giving his son‚ Slowe‚ permission to handle all of his financial assets. Slowe is now worried that Mark may need Medicaid assistance in the future and wants to remove his assets‚ from his name‚ and give them to his children. Under the current law‚ Mark will be ineligible for Medicaid for a period of 5 years after the gift transfer is made‚ so it’s in Marks best interest to
Premium Gift Nursing home Appeal
behavior is a concern to schools and parents and to fellow pupils‚ whose education may be adversely affected. Objective: The objectives of this study were to identify the level of students discipline problems and dominant factors attributing to the students discipline problems among the students in SMK St. Thomas. Material and Methods: The study was carried out to 50 students from several classes from Form 6 using questionnaires. The data collected were analyzed by Statistical Packages for
Free Education Teacher High school