Next Generation Football Report Title Youth Development Program Report name Joga Bonita Freestyle Competition Prepared By Raja Syamir Ikram b. Raja Shahrizan 110079959 / 1001F75169 Prepared for Ministry of Youth and Sports Group Members Shahmi Thiang Amir Nuramin Mohd Zakwan Ahmad Taufiq Table of content 1.0 Executive summary…………………………………………………………… 3 2.0 Company background…………………………………………………………..4 3.0 Situation……………………………………………………………………….. 4 4.0 Objective………………………………………..
Premium FIFA World Cup FIFA Association football
‘Stack Ranking’ Employees Article by Authors‚ Shira Ovide and Rachel Feintzeig Abstract In the article “Microsoft Abandons ‘Stack Ranking’ Employees”. Shira Ovide and Rachel Feintzeig discuss how getting rid of such a system will benefit the company. The authors cite several sources. They don’t go into too deep of detail on why CEO Mr. Ballmer decided to implement the change‚ only that before he leaves the company for good he wanted to leave his mark on Microsoft with a new ranking system
Premium Microsoft Computer software Employment
automated essay scoring is regarded as a classification or regression problem. Machine learning techniques such as K-nearest-neighbor (KNN)‚ multi-ple linear regression have been applied to solve this problem. In this paper‚ we regard this problem as a ranking problem and apply a new machine learning method‚ learning to rank‚ to solve this problem. We will introduce detailed steps about how to apply learning to rank to automated essay scoring‚ such as feature extraction‚ scoring. Experiments in this paper
Premium Machine learning Supervised learning
employees and outlines the impact of those methods on productivity‚ morale and level of motivation. Force ranking is a performance intervention‚ which can be defined as an evaluation method of forced distribution where managers are required to distribute ratings for those being evaluated into a pre-specific performance distribution ranking (Cooper and Argiris‚ 2011). Meisler defines force ranking “as a workforce-management tool based on the premise that in order to develop and thrive‚ a corporation
Premium Motivation Performance appraisal Jack Welch
similar entry tariffs. The Universities are compared by three factors: overall and subject ranking‚ career prospects and student satisfaction. Firstly‚ these universities will be compared by ranking‚ because rank shows the overall score of the university‚ including all the comparable areas of the Guardian University Guide (Guardian‚ 2012) or the Complete University Guide (CUG‚ 2012). Based on overall ranking of (Guardian‚ 2012) Lancaster is seventh and has remained stable since 2011‚ while Loughborough
Free College University Higher education
www.outlookindia.com | http://www.outlookindia.com/articlefullwidth.aspx?237765 WEB MAGAZINE SECTIONS INTERACTIVE FEATURES REGULARS RESOURCES RSS Business MAGAZINE | JUN 30‚ 2008 Top 35 Private Engineering Colleges Rank Name of Institute City IC II I PP PS GT IC: Intellectual capital (600)‚ II: Industry Interface (300)‚ I: Infrastructure (650)‚ PP: Placement Performance (400)‚ PS: Pedagogic System (200)‚ GT: Grand Total (2150) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Premium 1967 1966 1979
opinion regarding forced ranking performance appraisal? Do they motivate employees? Explain By implementing a forced ranking procedure‚ organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all‚ a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Assuming that the system is wisely constructed and effectively executed‚ a forced ranking system can provide
Premium Motivation
PLASTIC MOLDING COMPANY (Capital Budgeting: Ranking Problems) OBJECTIVE: The objective of this case is to explore the ranking differences that may result from using the PI‚ NPV‚ and IRR evaluation techniques. It illustrates the time disparity‚ size disparity‚ and life disparity problems and the appropriate approaches to the resolution of these problems. This case works well either as a homework problem coinciding with the introduction of project ranking and capital-rationing material or as an in-class
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return
following‚ compare results and rankings with the base case. Briefly discuss your findings. a. Check the current 10-year Treasury note yield. Add the 10% risk premium and recalculate. b. Reduce the tax rate to 30% and realculate. c. Eliminate salvage values in each case. d. On the replacement‚ I made assumptions about training costs and the timing of the new boat costs. Make your own assumptions and recalculate. 2. Why do NPV and EAC rankings differ? Which ranking do you prefer? Why? 3.
Premium Economics Costs Interest
fame. II. Mechanics in playing the game The Pieces The pieces used in the Game of the Generals.The player’s set of pieces or soldiers with the corresponding ranks and functions consist of the following 21 pieces. A higher ranking piece will eliminate any lower ranking piece‚ with the exception of the spy‚ which eliminates all pieces except the private. The pieces are bent in an angle in order to show the piece’s rank or insignia only to a player and not to his opponent. In plastic sets‚ the
Premium Corporal Chess