The contingency approach to management emerged from the real life experience of managers who found that no single approach worked consistently in every situation. The basic idea of this approach is that number management technique or theory is appropriate in all situations. The main determinants of a contingency are related to the external and internal environment of an organisation. The process‚ quantitative‚ behavioural‚ and systems approaches to management did not integrate the environment. The
Premium Management Decision theory
and that is job enlargement‚ job rotation‚ and job enrichment. They are different in some ways but alike in many. The first way is job enlargement. This way is to expand in several tasks than just to do one single task. It is also the horizontal expansion of a job. It involves the addition of tasks at the same level of skill and responsibility. It is done to keep workers from getting bored. This would also be considered multi tasking by which one person would do several persons jobs‚ saving the
Premium Learning Skill Task
Factors Affecting Rational Choice Most consumer behavior analyses and programs seek to dig out consumers’ needs and wants‚ which direct their purchasing and decision behaviors. Consumer behavior and choice are complex‚ inherently dynamic and potentially affected by a number of factors. According to this‚ it seems that the rational choice theory should make some adjustments to be adopted to this increasingly more dynamic reality and marketing environment and thus set a realistic and stable base for
Premium Rational choice theory Rationality Decision making
the following: · Impartiality: weighting interests equally · Rationality: backed by reasons a rational person would accept · Consistency: standards applied similarly to similar cases · Reversibility: standards that apply no matter who "makes" the rules These are‚ in a sense‚ the rules of the "ethics game"‚ no matter which school or approach to ethics one feels the closest identity. The Utilitarian approach is perhaps the most familiar and easiest to understand of all the four approaches to ethics.
Premium Ethics Virtue ethics Deontological ethics
Furthermore‚ rational choice theory is useful in trying to explain and understand why human trafficking and forced labor occurs. According to this theory‚ the decision-making process of rationality is what determines the opportunities taken after weighing the costs‚ anticipated benefits and risk of committing these crimes. The perpetuators from the case outweighed the consequences from their crimes with the benefits and decided to execute them anyway. This theory is both offender and offense specific
Premium Economics Rational choice theory Social sciences
Choice theory was born out of the perspective of crime causation which states that criminality is the result of conscious choice. This theory is also known as the rational choice theory. According to this theory‚ the choice whether or not to commit a criminal act is the result of a rational thought process that weighs the risks of paying the costs of committing a crime‚ against the benefits obtained. In other words‚ if the benefits--monetary or otherwise--outweigh the risks of sustaining the costs
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
A critical look at the Communicative Approach (1) Michael Swan This (the first of two articles) examines some of the more theoretical ideas underlying the ‘Communicative Approach‘. These include the belief that we should teach ‘use’ as well as ‘meaning; and some attitudes regarding the teaching of ‘skills’ and ‘strategies’. A second article will deal with more pedagogical aspects of the approach‚ especially the idea of a ‘semantic syllabus’ and the question of ‘authenticity’ in materials and methodology
Premium Language education Communicative language teaching Teaching English as a foreign language
Republic‚ Socrates argues that the rational part of the soul can be distinguished from the appetitive part. Before writing on the portions of the soul‚ Socrates begins to discuss how the soul is constituted. Socrates divides the soul into three separate parts – the appetitive‚ the spirit‚ and the rational. Each part of the soul has its own distinct role which it must perform. The idea of different parts of the soul (for the purposes of this paper‚ the appetitive and rational) differing from one another
Premium Plato Soul Socrates
Kimberly Galt Purpose • Introduce everyone to the foundation knowledge of qualitative‚ quantitative and mixed methods research; useful to understanding the designs and methods series being offered this Fall and Spring • Provide basic overview of how the research process integrates with different qualitative‚ quantitative‚ and mixed designs and methods a researcher may consider using. Instructions • As we proceed through this presentation‚ please identify areas where you would like a more intensive
Premium Scientific method Research Qualitative research
Subject B is a trained chimpanzee with the language and cognitive skills of a human three year old (e.g. a cue card vocabulary of several thousand words). Q2. If the capacity for “rational thought” is the basis for the right not to suffer‚ then does A have moral rights at all? Q3. If the capacity for “rational thought” is not the basis for moral rights‚ but the capacity to feel pain is‚ then is favoring to A over B (in i‚ ii‚ and iii) like ‘racism’? Q4. Could ‘membership in the same species’
Free Human Morality Species