Anna Graciella I. September 5‚ 2012 BSPT 1 B-2 PHILO-19 Sir. Dino Cabrera Summary of Chapter 2 “THE GREEK PHILOSOPHY: SOCRATES‚ PLATO AND ARISTOTLE” There are many different philosophers who appear during the fifth century one of this were the Sophist came from the greek word sophisma and sphizo meaning “I am wise”‚ their philosophy influenced Greece that led to democracy. The Sophist moves
Free Plato Aristotle Socrates
Confucius and Aristotle were two of the most critical philosophers in human history. Much of their work on virtue and ethics has been passed down through ages and used to teach generations on the differences of what is considered a rightful act or a wrongful one. This paper will discuss the similarities and differences of each philosopher. Analyze differences between Chinese and Greek cultures. It will also explore the application of these virtues/ethics in the modern work place. Aristotle was a Greek
Premium Philosophy Ethics Plato
Tory Macdonald 9.25.12 Ethics of War and Peace Essay #1 My question: Plato‚ Aristotle and Cicero all talked about Just War Theory‚ and emphasis on the Just Warrior. Obedience and loyalty ( can lead to destruction. Plato‚ Aristotle and Cicero‚ the fathers of the Just War tradition‚ develop and enhance the concept of civic virtue and the necessity to uphold such morality during the most chaotic‚ violent and brutal of times – war. They each defend the necessity of war; yet emphasize
Premium Laws of war Peace
According to Aristotle‚ in order to pursue virtue we must learn to both feel and act correctly. Being a virtuous person entails being affected by pleasure and pain. In book II of “Nicomachean Ethics”‚ Aristotle begins by explaining how virtuous actions are acquired by habit. He writes‚ “Rather‚ we are by nature able to acquire them‚ and we are completed through habit” (Aristotle 18). Essentially‚ Aristotle is saying that we acquire habits as we acquire skills. Virtues are acquired through habituation
Premium Ethics Virtue Plato
of natural law. Like Aristotle‚ he believes that everything has a purpose‚ which is determined and fulfilled by natural law. However‚ he makes a very clear contradiction to Aristotle’s beliefs when it comes to the issue of what the purpose of justice is. Aristotle believes that justice is the presence of all virtue‚ while Thomas believes that Justice is one thing on its own‚ he believes that it is specifically the virtue of a good citizen. This idea is one that Aristotle could not have understood
Free Aristotle Thomas Aquinas Natural law
things to be aimed at” for a tragic hero according to Aristotle. Theses four traits include moral goodness‚ propriety‚ realism‚ and consistency. He also says that a tragedy must invoke catharsis‚ the purgation of the emotions pity and fear. A good example of an ancient Greek tragedy is the Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. The story of Oedipus Rex greatly supports Aristotle’s claims about tragedy. It’s obvious that to be a hero one must be good. Aristotle adds that “any speech or action that manifests moral
Premium Tragedy Poetics Sophocles
Merrium-webster.com defines ultimate reality as “something that is the supreme‚ final‚ and fundamental power in all reality”. Although not mentioned in depth in Nicomachean Ethics‚ Aristotle does believe in an ultimate reality; a god-like ‘prime mover’ that set everything into motion. Surprisingly similar‚ Plato uses reflection and reason to deductively determine that there is a ‘natural creator’ who “…created…everything…in its essential nature” (Plato 316). While they mostly agree on ultimate reality
Premium Universe Aristotle Ontology
Aristotle claims that an activity is all happiness and good for someone‚ what he mean is that happiness are not a position; it is a way that will continue your trough out life. To understand happiness you must also understand the human soul‚ Aristotle says there are three different parts‚ part one is the vegetative‚ which basically means the fact that we are living just like the vegetables. In the second part there are the rational and irrational‚ which we and the animals have in common and share
Premium Ethics Nicomachean Ethics Eudaimonia
focusing on naiveness of focal groups. One example is where offenders impersonate government officials and ask for personal information with threats of losing benefits by not submitting. Due to this‚ the most appropriate theory that applies is rational choice theory.
Premium Fraud Identity theft Credit card fraud
In order to think of rational counterfactuals people use causal knowledge. Causal knowledge is a basic understanding that one thing will cause another. Scientists were able to prove that even young children use causal knowledge while they play pretend. Gopnik wrote‚ “Causation is what gives fantasy its logic” (Gopnik 175). This means that when we imagine different situations‚ without causal knowledge‚ our counterfactual thoughts might not make sense. Gopnik points out‚ “once you know one thing is
Premium Psychology Mental disorder Psychiatry