John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society‚ a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities
Premium John Rawls A Theory of Justice Original position
philosophers as well as economists. One of the topic raised is utilitarianism as the principle that holds inequality and distributive justice by Jeremy Betham (1748-1832). The idea is that the distribution of goods is just if and only if it maximizes aggregate utility (Reiss‚ 2013 p.256). Some critics were later discovered whether utilitarianism sustains the concept of distributive justice. Reiss for instance argued that utilitarianism ignores people’s right (p.261). Other conceptual difficulties of utilitarianism
Premium Justice Distributive justice Economic inequality
1.2.Definition of Justice according to Rawls. The notion of justice is very important as it affect every rational being in all sectors of life‚ regardless of faith‚ race‚ creed for the fact that it is the moral and political concept. “The origin of the word justices comes from Latin‚ jus which means right or law.” In a simple sense of the word‚ justice would mean someone who typically doing who is morally right and is disposed to giving someone his or her due. The word fair can be used as synonym
Premium John Rawls John Rawls Justice
Distributive justice concerns the proper and equal distribution of goods and attention‚ mostly from a monetary basis such as taxes‚ compensation and re-imbursement. This distribution is most often based on the needs and merits of individuals and organizations. The difficulty lies in deciding how and to whom allocations are dispersed as well as fairness of disbursement of funds based on individual and organizational entitlements. It mainly deals with what is fair monetary compensation for labor
Premium Political philosophy Justice Law
Political Liberalism John Rawls ’ Political Liberalism is an answer to the most common criticism of his Theory of Justice as Fairness where critics argued that it was just another conception of justice that is incompatible with other doctrines. It failed to clarify the concept of the good in a reasonable pluralist society by not distinguishing between an independent political theory and a comprehensive moral theory addressing the problem of Justice. This leads Rawls to refine his initial theory
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
they represent.” In his book‚ A Theory of Justice‚ Rawls indicates “how justices as fairness can be extended to international law for the limits of judging the motivations of just war.” In doing so Rawls expounds that the
Premium Political philosophy Justice John Rawls
In A Theory of Justice‚ John Rawls argues for the theory of “justice as fairness‚” a theory that is grounded in the hypothetical contract of the original position. Ronald Dworkin argues against the practicality and applicability of a doubly hypothetical agreement‚ - “a hypothetical question about hypothetical reactions” - which occurs in original position (D’Agostino). Here‚ I will explore Rawls’s arguments and assess the legitimacy of Rawls’s assumptions and claims. I will also discuss the arguments
Premium Political philosophy Ethics John Rawls
Hayek and Rawls take different paths along their journey to reach what they believe the proper form of distributive justice would be. They both follow liberal ideology‚ focusing more on the individual. Hayek follows a line of thinking based on liberty‚ utility‚ and a “economic order based on the market‚” and with that with that economic order comes capitalism as the most viable option for the society (Hayek‚ LLL p.68). Hayek believes that this society will offer the best opportunities for access
Premium John Rawls Liberalism Political philosophy
Rawls’s theory of justice is a good one. But I doubt if this can be applied in reality. As everyone in our society has his/her own role or position. For example‚ I am a student‚ and you are a professor. As a student‚ I always want to do less work and have good grades; while as a professor‚ you would like students to study hard. So when come to the decision of what is justice‚ we will have different opinions. Same as when governor or some authorities define the concept of justice‚ they will have
Premium Justice Prima facie Ethics
John Rawls and Robert Nozick views on Justice do have several opposing differences; however‚ they both do have similar context in some ways. Some of the major differences addressed in the reading are the issue of a legitimate distribution of wealth by the government. In John Rawls Second principal‚ the difference principle‚ Rawls basically explains that inequalities‚ socially and economically‚ are acceptable if they promote the well-being of the poor. Basically‚ John Rawls believes that the poor
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy A Theory of Justice