Maryland v. Shatzer‚ 559 U.S. 98 (2010) FACTS: In August of 2003 Detective Shane Blankenship‚ a social worker‚ was assigned to investigate and interview Michael Shatzer about claims that Shatzer had sexually abused his three year old son. At the time of the investigation Shatzer was incarcerated at Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown for an unrelated child-sexual abuse offense. Before asking Shatzer any questions‚ Detective Blankenship informed Shatzer of his rights‚ Shatzer then obtained
Premium Child abuse Human sexual behavior Prison
Wal-Mart: A Case Analysis Matthew Hoskins LeTourneau University Wal-Mart: A Case Analysis Wal-Mart‚ its headquarters located in Bentonville‚ Arkansas‚ is currently the largest retailer offering different formats of stores to fit the needs of the neighborhoods in which they are located. The company operates in several different countries: Argentina‚ Brazil‚ Canada‚ Chile‚ China‚ Costa Rica‚ El Salvador‚ Guatemala‚ Honduras‚ India‚ Japan‚ Mexico‚ Nicaragua‚ Puerto Rico‚ and the
Premium Marketing Price Supermarket
Case Brief: Sutter v. Hutchings Case Name‚ Citation & Court: Sutter v. Hutchings‚ 254 Ga. 194‚ 327 S.E.2d 717‚ Georgia Supreme Court‚ decided 1985. Parties & Procedural History: Trial Court level: Plaintiff Sutter sues Defendant Hutchings. Defendant filed summary judgment motion‚ and court granted judgment in favor of Defendant. Plaintiff appealed. First appeal: Ga. Court of Appeals affirmed judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals again to Ga. Supreme Court. Facts: Mrs
Premium Appeal Law Court
Wal-Mart/Vlasic Case Study Erik Yannuzzi Supply chain management and logistics play a huge role in the way that Wal-Mart conducts it’s business. Wal-Mart does not accept orders that are late or out of stocks in their stores. That may sound unreasonable but Wal-Mart provides it’s suppliers with powerful tools to ensure that these things do not occur. Wal-Mart has established a database called Retail Link that it’s suppliers can gain access to and view real-time sales data that is linked to
Premium Supermarket Supply chain management Wal-Mart
The Private Movie Co.‚ Inc. v. Pamela Lee Anderson et al. 1. What are the facts? The Private Movie Company (Efraim) sued Pamela Lee Anderson for $4.6 million for walking away from oral and written contracts. The defendant (Anderson) claims to have agreed to the contracts on the stipulation that the script would be revised concerning nudity and simulated sex scenes‚ and upon reading the final script and seeing simulated sex scenes still included‚ walked out. 2. What is the legal issue? The
Premium Contract Void Gentlemen's agreement
Mazzagati v. Everingham‚ 512 Pa. 266 (1986). Facts: An automobile driven by Defendant fatally struck Plaintiff’s daughter. At the time of the accident‚ Plaintiff received a telephone call immediately after the collision at work informing her that her daughter had been involved in an automobile accident. Plaintiff arrived at the scene of the accident a few minutes later. Procedural Posture: Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the nature of a Demurrer granted by the Montgomery County
Premium Law Negligence Plaintiff
1. As a potential product line manager at DS‚ what is your reaction to the memo in Exhibit 2? For the product line managers the new system brings clarity and makes us more responsible. Specific goals for profit contribution‚ providing us with measurable assessment of performance‚ allow us to track and improve processes. What’s more with individual measurement of financial positions such as sales‚ revenues‚ costs etc. we can influence on each of them by increased level of responsibility for making
Premium Management Marketing Organization
Organization Design 3 credits Spring 2011 Professor: Phone: E-mail: Office: Section 1: Office hours: E-mail hours: Walk-in: Louise Tourigny‚ Ph.D. Administration (262) 472-5735 Office tourignl@uww.edu HH-4509 Monday from 5:15 to 7:45 p.m. at American Family Insurance‚ Madison Monday from 7:45 to 8:15 p.m. at American Family Insurance upon request Monday from 9:00 a.m. to noon; other times intermittent Thursday from 1:30 to 4:30 p.m. HH-4509 at UW-Whitewater COURSE OUTLINE INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS Organization design
Premium Strategic management Management Case study
Title: R. v. Hufsky‚ [1988] 1 S.C.R 621 Parties: Werner E. J. Hufsky – Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen - Respondent Decision: Appeal was dismissed Notions/Concepts: Constitutional Law Criminal Law Equality before the law Charter of Rights and Freedoms Arbitrary detention Unreasonable Search Refusal to provide breath sample Facts: Appellant was stopped at a random spot check by police Nothing unusual about his driving at the time of the spot check Spot check was for the purposes
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States
Citibank Case Questions: 1) Should Citibank launch the card product? Why or why not? 2) Given its upscale customer base‚ how should Citibank position its card‚ if it decides to launch it? 3) Which countries should Citibank enter first? Which countries should it avoid? 4) If you choose not to introduce the card‚ what would you do to achieve the $100 million earnings target by 1990? What kind of branch banking products should the bank offer? L’OReal Case Questions: 1) What is Beauty Product
Premium Marketing Wal-Mart Music industry