Sport Marketing Reebok (A) Case In this case the core issue is Reebok needs to find a way to dramatically shift Reebok from a fashion athletic to a performance athletic brand through sports marketing and investment in high profile athletes‚ teams and leagues. Currently‚ Reebok is positioning themselves on the traditionally stronger consumer groups‚ which are the 25-29 and 18-24 who have the largest disposable income. Although they must start focusing on getting more male athletes to endorse
Premium Marketing Advertising Athletic shoe
foundation. Nike should promote more campaigns to stop hunger and poverty. 4. Threats - Strong competition from Adidas‚ Reebok and Puma. - Accusations of poor work conditions. - The increase of counterfeit products in overseas markets. Reebok Swot Analysis. 1. Strengths -Low manufacturing cost since the manufacturing chain comes from Asia were labor costs are low. -Since Reebok does not own the physical factories‚ production can be switch to another location if needed. - High return on equity
Premium Brand Supply and demand Minimum wage
* Reebok went to pursue three multiproduct umbrella campaigns a. Television advertising during the 1988 Summer Olympics b. Television and print advertising with the tagline “Reeboks Let U.B.U.” c. Print advertising to introduce Reebok’s new performance feature‚ the Energy Return System * Didn’t know how involved it should be with Human Rights Now! World concert tour with Amnesty International * A lot of growth from 1982 and 1987‚ which resulted from… a. Broadening of existing
Premium Athletic shoe Olympic Games Summer Olympic Games
Challenges to Corporate Social Responsibilities Company: Reebok International Ltd. Student Name: Jedy Wang Student #: 250476511 Teacher Assistant: Mike Dove Due Date: 11/14/2008 Executive Summary The 20th century illustrated a dispersing trend of capitalism as the end of the Cold War illustrated evident economic prosperity in Western countries. Consequently‚ many former Communist countries implemented economic reforms due to the perception that capitalism was the economic ideology
Premium Social responsibility Corporate social responsibility Management
R “Reebok” case questions 1. How could viral marketing be used to complement or replace traditional media in this case? In this case‚ Reebok created “buzz” to attract the potential customers since its markets changed and its target consumers moved their attention away from the traditional media. Therefore‚ Reebok moved its advertising resource away from magazines and newspapers to online and mobile platform. Moreover‚ Reebok also advertised at sporting events‚ such as in NBA basketball
Premium Advertising Marketing Brand
advertising policy Intro: Reebok innovative advertising policy and problematic through Micky Pant’s watchful eye. a. Tate case presentation. b. The principle of viral marketing (Buzz). PART ONE - Company presentation 1. The company 2. The market 3. Evolution of market: from athletic to fashion PART TWO – Strategy‚ advertising history‚ and social changes 1. From 1958 to 1982: Classic medias dominance a. Reebok strategy b. Reebok communication process c
Premium Advertising Brand Reebok
gathered from the research group and the surveys‚ we have concluded that Nike is the best brand and the Reebok is considered to be the worse brand. For the consumers‚ it was not the feel or the style of the shoe that was the reasoning for the dislike in the product‚ it was the lack of promotions and the lack of competition it gave the marketing giant known as Nike. Many felt that they never knew when new Reebok products were being released and they were not excited about the Reebok brand compared to
Premium Athletic shoe Marketing Reebok
Industry Analysis Using: Michael Porter’s Industry Forces Model Reebok International‚ Ltd. (1995): The Nike Challenge Case Authored By: Thomas L. Wheelen‚ Moustafa H. Abdelsamad‚ Shirley E. Fieber‚ and Judith D. Smith Analysis By: Tim Sacks Threat of New Entrants Barriers to Entry The athletic shoe industry is slowly becoming a global oligopoly. There are many barriers to entry preventing new entrants from capturing significant market share. Large athletic
Premium Barriers to entry Athletic shoe Shoe
of Reebok can be traced back to as early as the 1890s. A man by the name of Joseph William Foster heard the demands of the athletes who wanted to run faster and developed the first cleated running shoes. By 1895‚ he had formed J.W. Foster and Sons. This company made hand-stitched athletic shoes for a lot of the top athletes during that time. This paved the way for the creation of Reebok International‚ still in England‚ which was founded by two of Joseph Foster’s grandsons. The name "Reebok" is
Premium Athletic shoe Reebok Footwear
Reebok: Pursuing Generation X Reebok is a global‚ American inspired brand‚ in a highly competitive athletic and sportswear industry‚ committed to creating products and marketing programs that reflect the brand’s unlimited creative potential (Reebok). The 2003 rankings place Reebok in third place of U.S. athletic shoe market share with 13%; Nike dominates at 36% while other athletic brands make up 26% of the U.S. market (Sporting Goods Intelligence). In 1982‚ Reebok was a main component in introducing
Premium Advertising Marketing