Introduction This report details the observations made in the closing statement of Regina v Bowden before Judge McEwen. The rape charge held against Bowden placed this case within the Criminal Jurisdiction of the South Australian District Court (Courtroom Five). Issues of Fact & Law The predominant legal issues that arose in the closing statement of the trial were pertinent to the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA). The defence cited section 75 of the Act to permit the jury to deliver an
Premium Jury Law Appeal
Case Title: Regina v. G and another (Appellants) (On Appeal form the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)) Citation: [2003] UKHL 50 Procedural History (PH): The appellants were charged on 22nd August 2000; without lawful excuse damaged by fire; commercial premises and being reckless as to whether such property would be damaged. The appellants stood trial before Judge Maher in March 2001. The appellants’ case at trial was that they expected the fire to extinguish itself on the concrete
Premium Mind Criminal law Mens rea
decided to look into the Regina Company case using the perspective of a financial analyst who will report to the Electrolux management and board. This decision was due to the following reasons: 1. Any further audit from the side of Regina‚ Electrolux or the SEC will only yield a similar result as the last audit thus being redundant and utterly useless 2. Looking at the case in the perspective of a member of the board of Regina will prove to be useless in evaluating the case since we will have no
Premium Income statement Balance sheet Revenue
This is the case of Queen vs. Dudley and Stephens. Before I begin‚ I want to remind you that this is the court of law. In this country‚ the law states that any person who deliberately takes the life of another is guilty of murder. There is no question as to who took the life of Brooks‚ a man with families and loved ones waiting for him to return from sea. The murderers sit in the seats of the defendants today. Thomas Dudley and Edward Stephens had deliberately took the life of Mr. Brooks in his most
Premium Law Murder Ethics
1. Prepare common-sized financial statements for Regina for the period 1986 to 1988. Also‚ compute key liquidity‚ solvency‚ activity‚ and profitability ratios for the years 1987 and 1988. Given these data‚ identify what you believe were the high-risk financial statement line items for the 1988 Regina audit. I computed the ratios for 1986 as well as the required 1987 and 1988. The most interesting occurrence is how the values for the growth were not translated in the ratios. As sales increased
Premium Finance Balance sheet Economics
In the "case of the shipwrecked sailors"‚ three men were marooned after the sinking of an oil tanker. Subject to extreme conditions and starvation‚ the men drew lots after about twenty five days and decided that the loser would be killed and eaten as food. When one of the men lost the draw‚ he pulled out his consent‚ and the other two men killed him anyway‚ eating him. Five days later‚ the remaining two men were rescued and ensuing actions incurred their murder charges. This seems to be a simple
Premium Murder Law Capital punishment
Status: Positive or Neutral Judicial Treatment R. (on the application of Rottman) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis House of Lords 16 May 2002 Case Analysis Where Reported [2002] UKHL 20; [2002] 2 A.C. 692; [2002] 2 W.L.R. 1315; [2002] 2 All E.R. 865; [2002] H.R.L.R. 32; 12 B.H.R.C. 329; [2002] Po. L.R. 124; [2002] A.C.D. 69; Times‚ May 21‚ 2002; Independent‚ July 1‚ 2002; Official Transcript Case Digest Subject: Criminal procedure Keywords: Arrest; Extradition; PACE codes of practice;
Premium Police
☼20150428 97591-1-KT Kamloops IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REGINA v. MICHELLE MARIE FOREMAN REASONS FOR SENTENCE OF THE HONOURABLE JUDGE S.D. FRAME Counsel for the Crown: Counsel for the Accused: Place of Hearing: Mr. Evan Goulet Ms. Michelle Stanford Kamloops‚ B.C. Date of Hearing: April 21‚ 2015 Date of Judgment: April 28‚ 2015 2015 BCPC 104 (CanLII) Citation: ☼ R v. Foreman 2015 BCPC 0104 R v. Foreman [1] Page 1 Michelle Marie Foreman is before me for sentencing following
Free Crime Assault Criminal law
REGINA COMPANY POINT OF VIEW: Regulator – National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting CASE CONTEXT: Regina Vacuum Cleaner Co. seemed to be doing excellent as manifested in its healthy 1988 annual Financial Statements. However‚ Regina Company ended up as a tragic story that served as cautionary epic to investors‚ creditors‚ auditors‚ the public and the government. The Company was acquired through a leveraged buyout by a group of Top Executives led by Donald Sheelen‚ former
Premium Balance sheet Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
http://www.whoislog.info/profile/dudley-seers.html People Privacy Contact Search Advertisement Home » People » S Dudley Seers Economist ◀ ▶ Jump to: 1. Personal facts 2. Death facts Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More Sharing Services 0 Dudley Seers (1920–1983) was a British economist who specialised in development economics. After his military service with the Royal Navy he taught at Oxford and then worked for various UN institutions. He was the director of the
Premium Economics Royal Navy Development economics