Criminal courts have two different functions‚ the adjudication and sanctioning in the courts. The first function of the criminal courts is adjudicating a criminal complaint. A criminal complaint Is giving a written document‚ an indictment. In this document‚ one citizen is accusing another citizen of violating the law. After this file has been approved by the court‚ the defendant answers the allegations of violating the law. After going to trial‚ the defendant most claim to be guilty or not guilty
Premium
Supreme Court Case CJA/354 Supreme Court Case The discovery of unethical billing alongside unethical accounting practices provoked a chain reaction towards a hospital accountant by the name of Rehberg. An accountant trying to serve justice was entangled in a web of lies. Rehberg vs. Paulk is a very interesting Supreme Court case. Rehberg vs. Paulk embodied much of the injustice that is not presented to the public when sworn officials break the very laws that are supposed to be
Premium Jury Criminal law Law
In his article “Lifeboat Ethics: the Case Against Helping Poor‚” Garrett Hardin argues that our planet faces the problem of overpopulation. The reproduction rate in poor countries is much higher than in rich countries. Therefore‚ while population of poor nations is increasing tremendously‚ the ratio of rich nations steadily decreases. Hardin also introduces the concept of “The Tragedy of The Commons’’ and explains it as a negative effect on consumers of common resources around the world. It has already
Premium Overpopulation Garrett Hardin Poverty
Ethics in Action II Liberty University Segment One: The Divorce 1. If this was your client‚ what would you say and do? Be specific. Why would you respond this way? First‚ I would let her speak without interruption‚ because she is expressing that she has had a lot of time thinking about divorce‚ since she has expressed that she has not been happy in a long time. Second‚ I would explore with her the consequences of her decision within the family. I would suggest family therapy too‚ explaining
Premium Ethics Conflict Morality
Drug Courts Sutoya Marlowe Fayetteville State University Criminal Justice 450 Dr. Robert Brown April 1‚ 2014 Abstract In order to understand the importance of drug court programs‚ it is important to learn what prompted the program. Before the first drug court was established in 1989‚ the United States has endured three drug epidemics that had profound consequences on the criminal justice system. Drug court programs intends to reduce substance abuse among offenders with addiction by
Premium Crime Drug addiction Criminal justice
Cases in Canadian Law Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant‚ a citizen of Iran‚ arrived in Canada on May 13‚ 1989‚ and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line‚ he was referred to a secondary examination‚ which involved a long wait‚ and‚ as he did not speak English‚ an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview‚ the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis‚ as he claims‚ first of all‚ that
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States Canada
reports that in reality‚ female youth account for just 3 percent of all criminal court cases (pg. 174). Social research offers many explanations for the role of girls in adolescent crime and public perceptions of their illegal activities. As was noted above‚ there is a strong relationship between victimization
Premium Crime Boy Female
1. Briefly describe the facts. These two men were friends for over 25 years. After work each day‚ they would go and get their special “package” from the liquor store‚ which included two lottery tickets‚ which never turned out to be a major winner. On December 16‚ 1982‚ Pearsall purchased the package without any monetary support from Alexander. However‚ Alexander was who scratched the tickets only to find neither was a winner. Later that day‚ Alexander went and purchased another package; letting Pearsall
Premium Family Legal terms New Jersey
Today’s society has been largely impacted from cases years ago‚ these cases changed many peoples’ lives. Before there was equality‚ there were arguments almost everyday regarding segregation and racism. To emphasize‚ some disagreements had to be settled by the Supreme Court‚ and the ruling made still have a lasting effect today. The Supreme Court has made many ruling effecting civil rights: Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ Brown vs. Board of Education‚ and Loving vs. Virginia. In Plessy vs. Ferguson‚ the Court’s
Premium African American Black people Race
Decision: High court held that the parties were in a partnership; hence United Domain was entitled to share in profit. Canny Gabrial Castle v Volume Sales(p200): Canny Gabrial argued that the 2 companies were joint ventures Decision: Agreement was partnership Polkinghorne v Holland(p205): Was the giving of financial advice outside the ordinary business of the law firm‚ such that the partners would be jointly liable Decision: Held that the firm was liable for the actions of hollan’s son
Premium Contract