Apologetical Causation Argument Since the dawn of life‚ man has pondered the meaning of his existence. Where did he come from? How did he get here? How was the universe formed? With respect to the previous questions‚ there are two primary sides taken in the age-old debate. There are the creationists and the non-creationists. The creationists believe there is an omnipotent creator of the universe whereas the non-creationists believe there is no creator‚ but that the universe simply formed
Premium Existence Cosmological argument Ontology
To The Administration of New Albany Plain Local Schools: Through my research on the nature of a serial killer for my final project in English‚ I have been able to grasp a better understanding of the causation of a serial killer’s brutal ways. If we educate society on the signs of an antisocial personality and understand what drives these people to commit such heinous crimes‚ many can help keep their communities safe by ending a potentially dangerous situation before it begins. There have been
Premium Crime Abuse Police
OCCUPIERS LIABILITY The occupancy of premises is affected by two statues: 1) The occupier’s liability act 1957. Under this act there is a duty to keep safe and lawful visitors to the premises 2) The occupier’s liability act 1984. Where an occupier may owe a duty to protect trespassers onto the premises. LAWFUL VISITORS A lawful visitor has permission to enter premises. This can be expressed permission of implied. There are four situations covering implied permissions: 1) If the occupier
Premium Management Contract Risk
Liability for Omissions The law has historically been reluctant to impose a general liability for omissions as opposed to positive acts. This means that there is no general duty of care in tort to act in order to prevent harm occurring to another. In Smith v Littlewoods Organisation‚ Lord Goff stated clearly that “the common law does not impose liability for what are called pure omissions”. Similarly‚ in Yuen Kun Yeu v A-G of Hong Kong‚ Lord Keith stated that people can ignore their moral responsibilities
Premium Tort law Legal terms Tort
Topics in Criminal Law May 25‚ 2010 Abstract Strict liability crimes require no culpable mental state and present a significant exception to the principle that all crimes require a conjunction of action and mens rea. Strict liability offenses make it a crime simply to do something‚ even if the offender has no intention of violating the law or causing the resulting harm. Strict liability is based philosophically on the presumption that causing harm is in itself blameworthy regardless of the
Premium Criminal law
Modern Epidemiology focuses on proximate risk factors that can be controlled at the individual level‚ but tends to ignore the social conditions that are largely responsible for diseases. This has led to incomplete understanding and underestimation of the influence of social determinants on health. According to Link and Phelan (1995) the social determinants are the ’Fundamental causes’ of diseases. The social factors that are linked to illness include race‚ socioeconomic status‚ gender and stress
Premium Hypertension Epidemiology Sociology
Negligence Causation And Remoteness Revision The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above‚ taken from our Tort I (Intentional & Negligence) Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at. Causation & Remoteness Causation According to CLA s 5E‚ plaintiff bears onus of proof of causation. • At common
Premium Common law Complaint Negligence
The life of a student starts with the first day‚ the first lesson‚ and your own batch of new and old friends. You’ve come a long way from your first day at _______. _______ has been your home away from home for years now‚ but it’s almost time for you to embark on a brand new journey. The school‚ its students‚ and personnel‚ have been witnesses to your successes‚ achievements‚ and moments. It is only fitting that we pay tribute to our SENIORS. I was surprised yet honored when I was told that
Premium Prince Reach Heart
! ! ! Liability for Negligence! 1. The Duty! PURE ECONOMIC LOSS ! Neighbour Test (Donoghue v Stevenson): Care must be taken to avoid acts Salient Features Test (Perre v Apand): Neighbour test is not enough in cases of which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who are pure economic loss to establish a duty of care‚ which caused a need for further persons I ought to reasonably have in contemplation as I take an action/omission. tests to identify
Premium Tort Tort law Negligence
American Intercontinental University Unit 1 Individual Project CRJS 105 – Theories of Crime Causation November 11th‚ 2010 Abstract The following will examine the differences between criminalists‚ criminologists and forensic psychologists. It will then transition into how what exactly is a white collar crime and a blue collar crime. Lastly the paper will discuss the differences between index-one and index-two crimes as defined by the UCR. Media Portrayal of Crime Introduction With the
Free Criminology Crime Theft