case studies. The first objection to Act Utilitarianism is “promise keeping.” Act utilitarianism is inconsistent with the moral conscious‚ because it forward looks considerations of what one would do. The consequences of not keeping the promise may be hard to determine whether it is right or wrong. One example of Darwell’s objection to Utilitarianism of “promise keeping” is keeping promises to the dead. Suppose you made a promise to your father to carry on the family business when he passes
Premium
time this is done is when Kane said “I made not campaign promises.” There was an extra pause or elaboration on the word “promises” implying the promises of his opponent were not kept. The next rhetorical device is when Kane said that he had more than hope‚ implying Jim Gettys has no hope or is hopeless. This type of rhetorical device is an antithesis. The next rhetorical device is of the same type. It is when Kane says he would make promises now if he was not too busy arranging to keep them. This
Premium Citizen Kane Orson Welles Political philosophy
audience’s mind about Getty. When the announcer welcomes Kane onto the stage he uses bias by announcing Kane as the next Governor of the state even before he was elected or won. Kane uses a rhetorical device when he says that he made no campaign promises so he has a chance at winning and he now can make them. He then proceeds to argue how Getty has less than a chance and he supports this by stating that every vote and independent poll shows that he will be elected. Kane’s argument was valid because
Premium Critical thinking Debut albums Political philosophy
The promise of America is also what those refer to as “The American Dream.” In other words‚ it is what foreigners believe will lead them to a “better life.” This includes jobs‚ housing‚ and the most significant‚ freedom. Freedom of speech‚ freedom of religion‚ etc. These more accessible opportunities is what makes “the dream” so enticing‚ so desired. This also means having their children‚ and the generations to come‚ grow up in an environment superior to that of which they would have grown up in
Premium United States Immigration to the United States Immigration
wife can return home. Therefore‚ Anthony promised to transfer the matrimonial home into her name. They had saw a lawyer‚ and prepared and signed a formal agreement. However‚ after returning home more than one year ago‚ Anthony refused to keep his promise‚ so his wife wants to get advice to get the house. Therefore‚ relating to the above scenario is the case of “letter of comfort”. Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Malaysia Mining Corpn Bhd (1989). In this case‚ the plaintiff wants the defendant gave a guarantee
Premium Marriage Case study Consideration
terminating the contract. Under promissory estoppel a promisor may be prevented from asserting that their promise is unenforceable because the promise gave no consideration for the promise. This is applicable when the promisor makes a promise that lacks consideration‚ and intends or should reasonably expect that the promise will rely on the promise and in fact does‚ and that the enforcement of the promise is the only way to avoid injustice. In this case‚ promissory estoppel did not prevent Sears from terminating
Premium Contract law Contract
This contract is void because Jeff is underage. Jeff should not receive his down payment back because he entered into a contract with Steve to pay $200.00 a month. According to our text "A contract is an exchange of promises between two or more parties." To break that promise or contract is enforceable by a court of law. In this situation‚ the court would be in favor of Jeff. The terms or conditions of the contract cannot be fulfilled because he is under age. The dealer will clearly state that
Premium Contract Uniform Commercial Code Law
scholarship because there was deadline in April 1‚ 1997 for the term as $1000 scholarship per year. Question 1 /Chapter 11/ There are a promise and an act in both unilateral and bilateral contracts. In unilateral contract‚ only one of two parties makes the promise; when other one do the act in order to take the promise‚ while in bilateral contract‚ they both make the promise for each other’s perform. If
Premium Contract
ultimately become the sole owner of the asset. A partner under musharakah mutanaqisah may lease his share of the musharakah asset to other partners. A partner may‚ at the time of entering into the contract‚ request the other partner to give a wa`d (promise) to gradually purchase the former’s share of the asset over an agreed period of time at market value‚ fair value or any price to be agreed by the partners. The partners may agree on a specific method of price calculation in the case where total shares
Premium Sarah Polley Property Renting
contract we know- every agreement enforced at law is a contract. So‚ all contracts are agreement but all agreements are not contract. Unlawful consideration may create agreement but not a contract:- Section 2(e) provides that- every promise and every set of promises‚ forming consideration for each other‚ is an agreement. Apart from this‚ section 2(a) and 2(b) provides that “When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything‚ with a view to obtaining the
Premium Contract Law