and interpretive perspectives underpinning social research- This essay intends to investigate by comparing and contrasting positivist and interpretive perspectives that surround social research. It will look into the use of methods such as quantitative and qualitative research and the effects and outcomes that this has in relation to social research. This will include the variations amongst them in both a positive and negative light. Before research can be undertaken the researcher must investigate
Premium Quantitative research Scientific method Sociology
Exploring Research Methodologies: Positivism and Interpretivism Before a researcher can initiate a research project‚ they face the confusion and the range of theoretical perspectives‚ methodologies‚ methods‚ and the philosophical basis that encompasses them all. This seemingly meticulous structure for the research process is in fact aimed toward providing the researcher with a scaffolding’‚ or a direction which they can go on to develop themselves to coincide with their particular research purposes
Premium Scientific method Quantitative research Sociology
Positivism vs Interpretivism Positivism is an approach in sociology that believes society can be studied using similar scientific techniques to those used in the natural sciences. (Browne‚ 2006) This concept tends to produce quantitative data and Concerned with hypothesis testing. (Collis and Hussey‚ 2003) Interpretivism is an approach emphasizing that people have consciousness involving personal beliefs‚ values and interpretations and these influence the way they act. They do not simply respond
Premium
Classicalism vs. Positivism What is crime? What makes people commit crimes and how can we stop it? These‚ and many other questions similar to these‚ are asked by criminologists everyday. Criminology is an ever growing field‚ mainly because there is more and more research occurring and new theories linking people and crime coming out everyday. Below the main field of criminology there are many subfields that have different theories and philosophies on what they believe link criminal behavior
Premium Sociology Criminology Crime
Outline the difference between positivism and phenomenologism. Positivists believe that there is objective truth that can be discovered through the methodical and careful application of deductive scientific methods. They believe that the world is made up of observable cause and effect situations that are external and not influenced by human consciousness. They emphasize the importance of objectivity‚ arguing that it can best be achieved if the researcher maintain social distance from the subjects
Free Scientific method Sociology Psychology
Critically Discuss the Impact of Classical and Positivist Theory on the Concepts and Practices of Policing. In this essay‚ Classical and Positivist theories of criminology will be explored and critically discussed to explore the impacts that they have had on modern day policing‚ introduction of laws‚ and police practice. The essay will first look at the history of the Classical Theory looking at Beccaria and Benthams classical school of criminology and its effects in a brief section. Positivist
Free Criminology Crime Sociology
Positivism: the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge Positivism is a philosophy developed by Auguste Comte (widely regarded as the first true sociologist) in the middle of the 19th century that stated that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge‚ and that such knowledge can only come from positive affirmation of theories through strict scientific method. This view is sometimes referred to as a scientist ideology‚ and is often shared by technocrats who believe in the necessary
Premium Scientific method Science Sociology
Marxian vs. Positivism Perspectives Crime and deviance are issues that dominate the public’s imagination; the study of which involves a number of contributing disciplines‚ criminology‚ statistics‚ psychology‚ biology to name a few but the largest contributor is sociology. There have been major changes in the way Sociologists perceive and study deviance over the years. In this essay the author will briefly compare and contrast the perspectives of Marxian and Positivism as they relate to the issues
Premium Karl Marx Capitalism Marxism
Positivism refers to a set of epistemological perspectives and philosophies of science which hold that the scientific method is the best approach to uncovering the processes by which both physical and human events occur. Though the positivist approach has been a ’recurrent theme in the history of western thought from the Ancient Greeks to the present day’ [1] the concept was developed in the early 19th century by the philosopher and founding sociologist‚ Auguste Comte. | Positivism was a method
Premium Sociology Positivism Scientific method
Also known as logical empiricism‚ rational empiricism or neo-positivism‚ logical positivism is the name given in 1931 by A.E Blumberg and Herbert Feigl to a set of philosophical ideas put forward by the Vienna Circle. This Vienna Circle was a group of early twentieth century philosophers who sought to re-conceptualize empiricism by means of their interpretation of then recent advances in the physical and formal sciences. Hence‚ the Vienna Circle represented a radical “anti-metaphysical” stance which
Premium Philosophy Empiricism