Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India CASE STUDY 2 International Marketing 1. The political environment in India has proven to be critical to company performance for both PepsiCo and Coca- Cola India. What specific aspects of the political environment have played key roles? Could these effects have been anticipated prior to market entry? If not‚ could developments in the political arena have been handled better by each company? There are several specific aspects of the political environment
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
COKE AND PEPSI LEARN TO COMPETE IN INDIA Brief Overview: * The case of Coke and Pepsi in India is a lesson that all marketers can observe‚ analyze and learn from‚ since it involves so many marketing aspects that are essential for all marketers to take into consideration * Pepsi entered into the Indian beverage market in July 1986 as a joint venture with two local partners‚ Voltas and Punjab Agro‚ forming “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” While Coca-Cola followed suit in 1990 with a joint venture
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola
Mid Exam Assigment Coke Versus Pepsi‚ 2001 Analysis Company Background The Coca-Cola Company : In 2000‚ Coca-Cola Company’s (KO) annual sales were $20‚5 Billion and its market value reached $110‚1 Billion. The company was the largest manufacturer‚ distributor and marketer of soft-drin concentrates and syrups in the world‚ and also marketed and distributed a variety of non carbonated-beverage product‚ which included minute maid orange juice‚ Fruitopia‚ Dasani bottled water‚ and Nestea‚ among
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi
their product. My Biology 141 class challenged people to do the Pepsi/Coke challenge to see if they were cable in distinguishing between Cola products Pepsi and Coke even if they had recently brushed their teeth or not. There were two hypotheses to test. The first one being that there is a difference between brushing your teeth and not brushing your teeth‚ within the last thirty minutes‚ in their ability to distinguish between Pepsi and Coke. The second one was that there is no difference between brushing
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
when doing business in developing countries. Although Coke and Pepsi were prompt at addressing the accusations brought against them‚ they overlooked multiple issues when starting business in India. When starting a business in a foreign country‚ the first priority a company should have is to learn the native culture. This was Coke and Pepsi’s biggest mistake and was most likely the reason why the Indian population responded so hostilely. Coke and Pepsi’s problems in India were complicated by the
Premium Water Water resources Freshwater
Case Study: Coke & Pepsi learn to compete in India Timing of entry into the Indian market brought different results for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola India. What benefits or disadvantages accrued as a result of earlier or later market entry? Coca-Cola (1990) Benefits: advantages as „Early-Follower“‚ possibility to use reliable market information that´s already existing take-over of standards position as international market leader Disadvantages: expert knowledge of competitors has to be overtaken
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Marketing
Case Study: Coke and Pepsi in India: Coca-Cola controlled the Indian market until 1977‚ when the Janata Party beat the Congress Party of then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. To punish Coca-Cola’s principal bottler‚ a Congress Party stalwart and longtime Gandhi supporter‚ the Janata government demanded that Coca-Cola transfer its syrup formula to an Indian subsidiary. Coca-Cola balked and withdrew from the country. India‚ now left without both Coca-Cola and Pepsi‚ became a protected market. In the
Premium Indira Gandhi Coca-Cola India
CeCe Miyagawa Professor Preston Cameron SBU200 Society and Business October 15‚ 2014 Case Analysis – Case#16 Coke and Pepsi in India: Issues‚ Ethics‚ and Crisis Management Introduction This case delves into whether or not Pepsi and Coke are equal targets in India. It questions whether the companies are doing their ethical duties‚ as well as whether they are managing crises and stakeholders well. The Real Problem The real problem is whether or not these companies are doing their duties to their
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Corporation
shifts to International Markets6 Pepsi troubles in Brazil6 Intrigue in Venezuela7 Pepsi’s problems elsewhere in International Markets……………………………………………………………………………7 Coke faces problems in Europe8 Issues of Contamination8 Coca Cola finally acts aggressively9 Pepsi’s Competitive maneuver near the millennium10 Pepsi’s role in Coke’s European problems.10 Pepsi’s antitrust initiations against Coca Cola 10 Coke and Pepsi in the Subcontinent10 Literature Review.12 Theoretical Framework.14 Independent
Premium Coca-Cola Pepsi Cola
Strategy ‘Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010’ Analysis of the US carbonated soft drinks (CSD) industry (a) Strategic issues The CSD market in the US (approx. $74 billion) is dominated by two concentrate manufacturers – namely Coke and Pepsi –. Both companies have been competing intensely since the 1970s‚ yet have thrived from this competition and have grown the business very profitably‚ as both have benefitted from the CSD market growth rates of around 10% p.a. until the early 2000s
Premium Strategic management Management Soft drink