Critial Evaluation of an Academic Source NMN Capella University ED5001 Critial Evaluation of an Academic Source This paper is a critical evaluation regarding the suitability of using scholarly articles as an academic source. We will analyze the “Critical Thinking: An Extended Definition” that discusses various scholar definiitons on what is critical thinking and the process of critical thinking. Checklist for Critical Evaluation Peer Review
Premium Critical thinking Thought Reasoning
Assigning Evaluation and Management (E/M codes) Lovejoy Difiore HCR 220 April 16 2012 Assigning Evaluation and Management (E/M codes) 1. Initial consultation is performed for a 78-year-old woman with unexplained weight loss‚ abdominal pain‚ and rectal bleeding. A comprehensive history and examination is performed. The code that I will be using is the 99204. The patient is 78 years old‚ so I am assuming that we will be billing Medicare for the procedures. The reason why I choose the
Premium Medicine Decision theory Decision making
Creativity Brought creative energy to the team and tried to think outside the box. 10 10 Leadership Gained respect and emerged as a team leader for the project 10 10 Quality of Work Work submitted was thoughtful‚ based on assignment criteria‚ well researched and proofread. 10 10 Preparation Well prepared for team meetings 10 10 Participation & Contribution Participated and contributed ideas to team 10 10 Motivation & Commitment Showed interest and cared
Premium Management Psychology Idea
Then if needed‚ the student has a right to special education services within the school system. The evaluation process ensures that a student’s needs can be identified and then a plan is in place for an appropriate education for the student. Non-discriminatory evaluation is vital because it gives an unbiased assessment for the students needs and helps identify academic goals for success. Appropriate Education -Appropriate education
Premium Education Special education Educational psychology
Travel Log Peer Evaluation I chose to do my peer evaluation on Jessica. Her speech really stood out to me above the others and that is why I chose to do my evaluation on her. Her speech was about her trip to the Rivera Maya. She started her speech with an awesome introduction explaining that the reason for her trip to the Rivera Maya was that she had just got married and was going on her honeymoon. The content of Jessica’s speech was very organized. She explained her trip chronology from the first
Premium Explanation Thought Critical thinking
Date: February 9‚ 2015 Introduction This paper will describe the criteria and strategies for termination of case management. The discussion will be on how independent care will help in continued client growth. The process focuses on discontinuing case management when the client transitions to the highest level of function‚ the best possible outcome has been attained‚ or the needs/desires of the client change. Criteria for termination of case management The termination of case management may
Premium Management Patient Law
Introduction As a part of academic curriculum for Business Operation Management set by Southern Institute of Technology I am submitting this paper on self evaluation of my understanding about Business Knowledge‚ Personal values‚ beliefs‚ attitudes and other relevant skills which are required or will be useful in setting up my own venture after successful completion of my course. I would like to evaluate my skills vis-à-vis the requirements and demands of the venture that I have planned i:e a service
Premium Personality psychology Entrepreneurship Scores
1) What factors should Ameritrade management consider when evaluating the proposed advertising program and technology upgrades? Why? Strategic evaluation 2) Ameritrade does not have a beta estimate as the firm has been publicly traded for only a short time period. What comparable firms do you recommend as the appropriate benchmarks for evaluating the risk of Ameritrade’s planned advertising and technology investments. Beta: 1) which firms to use as a benchmark and why 2) Calculate beta
Premium Economics Finance Investment
68 SECT ION 5: DEVE LOPI NG AN D IMPLE M E NT I NG AN EVALUAT ION PL AN EVALUATION METHODS Although indicators identify what you will look at to determine whether evaluation criteria are met‚ they do not specify how indicator data will be collected. You must still decide which evaluation method(s) to use. For example‚ if we are interested in knowing whether a community campaign was successful in influencing how community members view their relationship with the environment‚ we may select attitudes
Premium Focus group Question
Learning Activity 4 – Evaluation of Educational Tests Part 1: Description A. Title of the test: School Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory B. Acronym used: SMALSI C. Authors: Stroud‚ Kathy Chatham & Reynolds‚ Cecil R. D. Publisher: Western Psychological Services E. Year of publication: 2006 F. Intended grade/age level of use: Ages 8-12‚ 13-18 G. Intended purpose: To measure strategies students actively employ in learning and test taking H. Test category:
Premium Psychometrics Educational psychology Education