Q‚ Explain how someone can be a manager but not a leader‚ a leader but not a manager‚ and both a manager and a leader? Answer: The discussion between management and leadership has been considerable for a number of years. Differentiation between leadership and management is important. There is difference between manager and leader but both are important. Manger has to manage which means to accomplish and to bring about‚ to conduct and to feel the responsibility. On the other hand‚ Leader leads
Premium Management Leadership
Question 1: a) Explain the main characteristics of a consumer contract. Sale of Goods Act 1979 (SOGA 1979) is amended by Sale and Supply of Goods Act 1994 and the Sale and Supply of Goods to Consumers Regulations 2002 The Contract for Sale of Goods A contract for the sale of goods is ‘a contract in which the seller transfers‚ or agrees to transfer‚ the property in goods to a buyer for a money consideration‚ called the price’ This contract contains two conditions‚ Both ‘sale’ and ‘agreement to sell
Premium Contract Tort
DISCHARGE OF A CONTRACT Normally the completion of a contract is straightforward as parties carry out their tasks as required. There are four main different ways of ending a contract: a) Discharge by performance b) Discharge by agreement c) Discharge by breach d) Discharge by frustration DISCHARGE BY PERFORMANCE For this the courts expect performance to be exact and complete. This means that it must match contractual obligations RE MOORE AND LANDAUER (1921) If requiring a contract to be complete
Premium Contract law Contract Breach of contract
management literature. There is a close connection between leadership and power. People follow leaders because they have power and people will follow them‚ the leaders get the power to lead. French and Raven (1959) identified that the power bases that managers can use are aimed to influence employees which include two types of personal power: expert power (respect accorded because of knowledge or skill and referent power (personal identification with and desire to emulate the leader). Three types of position
Premium Power
Voidable contract is a contract that has legal effect and force when it is made‚ but is liable to be subsequently annulled or set aside by the courts through the process of recission. Due to the section 10 of the Contracts Act provides‚ all agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of the parties competent to contract. As what i’ve been thought and my understanding‚ there are five causes which lead to the voidable contract. They are : 1. Coercion (S.15) 2. Undue influence (S.16)
Premium Contract Contract law
Contract Law Introduction In the following case note I will examine the High Court case; Smart Telecom Plc. V Radio Teilefis Eireann & Glanbia Plc. [2006] IEHC 176. The essence of this case is one involving a request for tenders put forward by RTE for sponsorship and the subsequent refusal of Smart Telecom’s referential bid thereto. The questions raised were (1) whether referential bidding was a permissible term of RTE’s offer and (2) if not‚ were they were obliged to re-tender the contract
Premium Contract
| |Table of Contents | |Contents |Page | |Introduction |3 | |P1.1- Compare different management styles |4 | |P1.2- leadership
Premium Management Leadership
CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND: 1 2. CONTRACT: 1 2.1 VALID CONTRACT: 2 2.2 VOID CONTRACT: 2 2.3 VOIDABLE CONTRACT: 2 3. SALES CONTRACT: 3 3.1 SUBJECT MATTER (MAL): 3 3.2 CLASSIFICATION OF MAL: 4 3.3 CONDITIONS OF VALIDITY OF SALE: 4 3.4 PROHIBITED SALES: 7 3.5 KINDS OF SALE TRANSACTIONS: 10 3.5.1 BAY AL MUQAYADAH: 11 3.5.2 BAY AL MUTLAQ: 11 3.5.3 BAY AL SARF: 12 3.5.4 SALAM CONTRACT: 13 3.5.5 ISTISNA 16 3.5.6 MURABAHAH 19 3.5.7 BAY’AL-MUAJJAL 22 4
Premium Contract Muhammad Money
for breach of contract regarding the bees and hives‚ Buyer must establish that there was a valid contract. To establish breach of contract‚ Buyer must show there was an offer and acceptance supported by consideration. Bilateral Contract One in which there are mutual promises between two parties to the contract‚ each party is both a promisor and a promise. Right and duty on each side‚ in which a promise is established on both sides. UCC or Common Law UCC governs contracts under the sale
Premium Contract
Contract Remedies BA265 Business Law II Terrance L. Williams Grantham University December 8‚ 2012 Contract Remedies In our case of National Drilling Company filing suit against Overland Transport‚ Inc. asking compensatory‚ consequential‚ and punitive damages‚ the recovery of National will be based on Quasi Contract. As one reads through the scenario‚ he or she may ask themselves a few questions. What were the exact terms of the contract between National Drilling and Overland Transport
Premium Breach of contract Tort Contract