Your Name: Marcos Zuniga Case Name: California v Hodari Citation: 499 U.S. 621 Date Decided: 1991 Area of Law: Fourth Amendment Vote: 7/2 Scalia delivered the opinion of the court‚ in which justice Rehnquist‚ CJ‚ joined and White‚ Blackmun‚ O’ Conner‚ Kennedy‚ and Souter‚ JJ‚ joined. Stevens‚ filed a dissenting opinion‚ in which Marshall‚ J.‚ joined Procedural History: California v Hodari first proceeding were through the juvenile courts. Hodari tried to suppress the evidence relating
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Schmerber v. California Case Brief Schmerber v. California 384 U.S. 757 (1966) FACTS: Armando Schmerber‚ the petitioner‚ had been arrested for drunk driving while receiving treatment for injuries in a hospital. During his treatment‚ a police officer smelled liquor on petitioner’s breath and noticed other symptoms of drunkenness so the officer ordered a doctor to take a blood sample which indicated that Schmerber had been drunk while driving. The blood test was introduced as
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Appeal United States
Robinson Cruose vs. Gulliver’s Travels Throughout the history‚ the writers of contemporary period tried to reflect their era’s social and political problems like inequalities between races or classes‚ corruptions in family life and social relationships‚ or the side effects of a politic shift. In 18th century‚ writers were also affected by these types of social troubles‚ and some of them took enlightening of the people as a mission by writing about the period’s dilemmas. During this
Premium Robinson Crusoe Gulliver's Travels Jonathan Swift
Supreme Court of the United States ____________ FALLWELL‚ GERRY JR. PETITIONER V. CHURCH OF THE VIRTUAL VIRGIN MADONNA‚ RESPONDENT ____________ Opinion presented by Chief Justice Marcella E. Lawrence Syllabus Facts: The Church of the Virgin Virtual Madonna (C.V.V.M.) was founded in 2003‚ following the death of singer/ songwriter Madonna. Although you can trace the roots of this institution back to the 1980’s‚ it was not until Madonna died from a gunshot wound that the religious
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Religion
Fernandez v. California: Fourth Amendment Upheld? POL 303 August 4‚ 2013 The Merit case of Fernandez v. California is seeking to determine whether the Constitutional rights of Walter Fernandez were violated under the 4th Amendment when law enforcement conducted a search of his residence upon obtaining consent from his girlfriend‚ who was also a resident‚ after Fernandez was taken into custody (and had stated his objections to the search while at the scene). In Georgia v. Randolph (2006)
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe is a story about the different ways that men cope with reality when hardship comes‚ but also the tale of Crusoe creating his own reality‚ rescuing a savage and fashioning his own world out of the untamed wilderness of a desert island. The central themes in the novel are the inter-racial relationship‚ moralism‚ and religion‚ philosophical and social beliefs. This thesis mainly analyze the character of the savage- Friday‚ a native of an island close to Crusoe’s‚ is depicted
Free Robinson Crusoe
Brookfield Commc’ns inc. v. west coast video: - Use of Brookfield’s MovieBuff trademark by West Coast as a domain name was infringement. o Confusion as to source or sponsorship. - use of Brookfield’s Moviebuff trademark by in West Coast’s keyword metatags was infringement. o Initial interest confusion. Trademarks online: Playboy v. Netscape- We know from the lanham act (15 USC 1114) that “use in commerce” of plaintiff’s mark is an element of trademark infringement
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity United States Constitution
If art is publicly funded‚ censorship should be allowed. Artists should be allowed to create anything their heart desires even if it offends people however‚ if their art is being funded by a public source the first amendment should no longer apply and the art should be created in a way that the general society sees fit and is not offended by. This is a matter of great debate and one of the biggest issues is who decides if the art is appropriate. The United States Government is by no means required
Premium Obscenity First Amendment to the United States Constitution Censorship
Free Speech and the Internet Team A University of Phoenix Online BUS415 - Business Law Facilitator: Mr. Mark Goodman December 6‚ 2004 Abstract Because the internet provides invaluable information at the touch of a button‚ unwanted and inappropriate information is readily available and concern over free expression and First Amendment violations with respect to filtering and censorship are at issue as we look at protecting children and families. Free Speech and the
Free First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity World Wide Web
obscenity is not protected speech but a crime. Although the definition of obscenity is not sufficiently clear‚ the United States Supreme Court provided a workable attempt in defining what is obscene. In 1973‚ in the landmark case of Miller v. California the Court held that before any material can be determined obscene‚ a three-prong test must be met: 1) determine whether the average person‚ applying contemporary community standards‚ would find the work taken as a whole appealing to prurient interests;
Free First Amendment to the United States Constitution Obscenity United States Constitution