The case Miller v. California (1973) was determined by the Supreme Court‚ which redefined the meaning of obscenity. The word obscene is hard to define and could be seen as “You will know it when you see it.” The Miller case determined if something was obscene‚ the average person‚ applying the standards must find the entire work‚ as obscene‚ the work depicts offensive sexual conduct defined by state law‚ and that the work as a whole lacks literary‚ artistic‚ political‚ or scientific value. Marvin
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution
This interesting case study was a terrific example of well-intentioned people doing everything correctly in terms of logistics‚ but failing to consider and plan for the human side of this very personal and unique interaction. As the text relates to us‚ Sarah James seemed on paper like a perfect representative for the inaugural term of the exchange program between Palm Lakes University (PLU) and the Instituto de Negocios Internationales (INI). Her initial performance in Mexico indicated that she
Premium International student Mexico Student
1.1) Brief of the New Century Financial Corporation Case Over the past two decades‚ nearly half of the homeowners obtained their loans through subprime mortgage lending. Subprime mortgages were becoming increasingly ordinary in daily life of business for homeowners over the past two decades. However‚ numerous lending institutions provided home loans to borrowers who have high credit risks and are not be able to payback the loans. New Century‚ which is the second largest subprime lender in the country
Premium Subprime mortgage crisis Subprime lending Mortgage
Loving v. Virginia Loving v. Virginia was a landmark civil rights decision of the USSC (United States Supreme Court)‚ which invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage. The case was brought by Mildred Loving‚ a colored woman‚ and Richard Loving‚ a white man‚ were sentenced to a year in prison in Virginia for marrying each other. Their marriage violated the state’s anti-miscegenation statue‚ the Racial Integrity Act of 1924‚ which prohibited marriage between people classified as “white”
Premium Marriage Miscegenation Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Teotihuacan located in the Mexico Valley and is one of the largest pre-Colombian city in the Mesoamerica and the Western Hemisphere. The Teotihuacan occupied central Mexica from around 100AD to 600AD. The Teotihuacan city was composed of many different temples‚ palaces‚ and apartment complex. Some of the major monuments of the Teotihuacan are the pyramids of the sun and the pyramid of the moon. As well as the Old Temple of Quetzalcoatl also known as the Feathered Serpent Pyramid. Identified by their
Premium Mesoamerica Mexico Aztec
that we were all going on a trip to Puerto Vallarta‚ Mexico. Our whole family was so excited so later that night we all went out to eat to celebrate. When we all got home we started getting packed right away. Our plane wasn’t suppose to leave for a couple house but we were all waiting at the airport so that we would not be late. It was about 2:00 pm when our plane took off and It was the start to a long trip. When we finally landed in Mexico it was about 6:30 pm so we just all of our stuff from
Premium Family English-language films Mother
2.1 (a) In the decision of District Court of New South Wales‚ Appellant (Ms Derrick) owed the Respondent (Rosannie Cheung) a duty of care‚ as she was driving at such a speed that it was beyond her ability to stop the car in time and notice that a child which suddenly darted from one of the parked cars. In addition‚ nearby shops and houses combined with the date‚ Saturday morning shortly before Christmas‚ should have alerted Ms Derrick that small children might be playing around‚ so she needed to
Premium Law Tort Negligence
Case Names and Roles Case #13 “The Day After” Charlie Jones: former Chief Executive of Riley Memorial Hospital Russell Adams: board chairman at Riley Memorial Hospital Bill Handy: COO of Riley Memorial Hospital Dr. Ralph Kemper: Chief of Radiology at Riley Memorial Hospital Background and Facts Over the last 18 months the average occupancy at Riley Memorial Hospital had fallen. This was certainly a cause for concern for Charlie and the hospital board. As a result‚ 134 employees were laid off to
Premium Board of directors Physician Corporate governance
Facts Mr Homer had worked for the PNLD for 10 years‚ following his retirement from the police force as a Detective Inspector‚ when in 2005 they introduced a new career structure for current and future employees. This structure constituted a three-part progression system‚ whereby to achieve the top (and highest pay) grade‚ it was a necessity to have a law degree. Mr Homer met all other necessary aspects to achieve the top tier‚ but did not have a law degree- nor had it been a requirement within his
Premium Violence Nuclear power Electricity generation
synonym of common law: general rule. In the case of Child V. Desormeaux‚ it was proven by the courts that the social hosts did not own a duty of care to the people injured by the defendant’s actions. “I conclude that as a general rule‚ a social host does not owe a duty of care to a person injured by a guest who has consumed alcohol and that the courts below correctly dismissed the appellants’ action.” The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in the case of Child v. Desormeaux supports the current common
Premium Law Tort Duty of care