The argument of the existence of god has been debated by many philosophers over the years and lives as a common issue between the ones who believe and don’t believe. The philosophers that theorize that god does or doesn’t exist end up running into the same problem when trying to convince the other they are right which is the lack of evidence and support. Because of the lack of evidence to prove one right‚ the truth of whether a god exist or not should rest in the opinion of a singular person and
Premium Metaphysics God Existence
Among Immanuel Kant’s (1724–1804) most influential contributions to philosophy is his development of the transcendental argument. In Kant’s conception‚ an argument of this kind begins with a compelling premise about our thought‚ experience‚ or knowledge‚ and then reasons to a conclusion that is a substantive and unobvious presupposition and necessary condition of this premise. The crucial steps in this reasoning are claims to the effect that a subconclusion or conclusion is a presupposition and necessary
Premium Logic Metaphysics Immanuel Kant
Meditations‚ he makes the strong claim that God must exist. I will first explain what Descartes’s argument for God’s existence is‚ and then I will attempt to support the argument that God does not need to necessarily exist through objections and replies. Premise 1: “We have an idea of God as an infinite and perfect being.” First‚ Descartes believes that there are properties that are inherently perfect. For example‚ being good is a perfection while being bad is an imperfection. A perfect being has all
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Mind
argue that Descartes’ argument for scepticism‚ (Cartesian doubt) conveyed in his First Meditation through three stages of doubt‚ is the most compelling‚ and evaluate the reasons for this being so. • Written as a means for us to better understand what we know‚ not necessarily as a way for Descartes to discuss his own views on why we should be skeptical about everything‚ however the criticisms the Meditations produced can also be contested. To this extent‚ Descartes’ argument is most compelling as
Premium Epistemology Truth Logic
Descartes has two arguments for skepticism‚ the first the dream argument and then second the evil demon argument. Both examples are used to raise doubts in things that we may commonly believe to be true. It seems right to believe that if you know something then you cannot doubt that thing‚ but Descartes wants to be certain in every way that he does in fact know that thing. These two examples are used to bring skepticism into your knowledge of things. For example‚ I know that I am taking a test‚ but
Premium Epistemology Truth Metaphysics
Standing on the Sun is a book that pretends to be full of provocative ideas about the future of capitalism; in reality‚ it makes weak‚ pie in the sky arguments full of flawed reasoning. The book is foolishly optimistic and idealistic in some instances‚ while also managing to ignore staggering upside in other situations. My criticism will focus on four instances of flawed reasoning. Firstly‚ the author takes something that is rare (a fundamental economic revolution like the industrial revolution)
Premium English-language films Fiction Mind
SOCRATES AND THE ARGUMENT OF RECOLLECTION A.Whitley Philosophy 380: Death‚ Dying‚ and the Quality of Life February 5‚ 2018 Socrates claims that “learning is no other than recollection.” Both Cebes and Simmias point out that in order for Socrates to convince them that the soul existed before birth. The argument starts by Socrates confirming with Simmias. Socrates states‚ “if anyone recollects anything‚ he must have known it before.” Simmias agrees with this definition
Premium Plato Socrates Soul
Philosophy Homework 15/09/2011 Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument isn’t necessarily valid‚ it could be invalid. It also isn’t necessarily sound – it could be unsound. If the argument is valid and the premises are true then overall the argument is sound. You will always gain knowledge with a deductive argument. The first premise will link with the second premise in order to make a conclusion. Deductive arguments aren’t based on assumptions. Inductive Arguments: The premises are all true so therefore
Free Logic
is the best life. However‚ I believe Aristotle’s argument is unsuccessful for the following reasons: Humans‚ from my understanding‚ are a super-intelligent form of animal. We have the forms of animals: our body requires energy‚ such as food and water. Humans can also practice reasoning to obtain
Premium Logic Meaning of life Reason
A solid argument consists of a claim‚ reasons/evidence and conclusion. “Reasons are beliefs‚ evidence‚ metaphors‚ analogies‚ and other statements offered to support or justify conclusions. When a writer has a conclusion she wants you to accept‚ she must present reasons to persuade you that she is right and show you why. You cannot determine the worth of a conclusion until you identify the reasons” (Browne & Keeley‚ 2012‚ p.28). Absent reasons or conclusion the argument is weak‚ unclear‚ pointless
Free Reasoning Logic Analogy