943 .890 Present value $6‚020 $4‚880 $9‚532 NPV $20‚432 11. a. Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Before-tax cash flow $(500‚000) $52‚500 $47‚500 $35‚500 $530‚500 Tax cost (7‚875) (7‚125) (5‚325) (4‚575) After-tax cash flow 44‚625 40‚375 30‚175 525‚925 Discount factor (7%) .935 .873 .816 .763 Present value $(500‚000) $41‚724 $35‚247 $24‚623 $401‚281 NPV $2‚875 Investor W should make the investment because NPV is positive. b. Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year
Premium Net present value Progressive tax Taxation
(NEM). First of all‚ under normal condition‚ this project could contribute around $73 million to the shareholder. The return will be more than 85% over the entire period. Furthermore‚ this project is quite stable because it can deliver a positive NPV for NEM when the iron ore price above $65.83 which is around 17% lower than basic price and more than 50% lower than the current price‚ smelting‚ refining and freight cost below $76.3 just below 60% higher than basic condition‚ the EBIT has to drop
Premium Iron ore Net present value Steel
rate is 10 percent. The ranking of projects differs‚ depending on the use of IRR or NPV measures. Which project should be selected? Why is the IRR ranking misleading? Using the IRR method will result in project Q being selected over P due to its higher rate of return. Using the NPV method would result in choosing project P because of its higher NPV. When there are mutually exclusive project‚ NPV method would be preferred. IRR is misleading because it ignores the absolute amount from the
Premium Net present value Rate of return Mortgage
CHAPTER 12 RISK TOPICS AND REAL OPTIONS IN CAPITAL BUDGETING FOCUS Traditional capital budgeting techniques compute point estimates of NPV and IRR with no measure of variability. Hence they don’t give managers the information necessary to include a tradeoff between risk and expected return in their decisions. This chapter is concerned with modern approaches to incorporating risk into capital budgeting. The techniques considered include probabilistic cash flows‚ risk adjusted discount rates
Premium Net present value Risk Random variable
Compute the NPV of both projects. Which would you recommend? What if they are not mutually exclusive? NPVMMDC = 7‚150 NPVDYOD = 7‚298 Based solely on the NPV analysis we would suggest to implement the DYOD project as it has a higher NPV. If both projects weren’t mutually exclusive‚ we would suggest implementing both as both have a positive NPV. 3. Compute IRR and payback period for both projects. Based on each criterion‚ which project would you recommend? If this differs from NPV analysis‚ explain
Premium Net present value
to determine the viability of projects and decisions based in the initial required investment. The financial industry has many standards regarding these methods‚ with the most commonly used being Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV). Each method encompasses positives and negatives; however if either are used without fully understanding what their prospective results reveal‚ mistakes can be made and under-estimations of return will happen. In a recent case Lockheed Martin chose
Premium Net present value Investment
from their earning which is huge money but even after that‚ the company is making lots of profits. 2. The 15% discount rate to calculate NPV and the Cash Flows by using that discount rate ended up with a negative NPV of $ 2‚137‚217.21. That the discount rate of 15% was out dated and insufficient. The rate of 9.62% to compute and using this number to get the NPV of $746‚981.31. I would recommend Worldwide Paper Company to use the 9.62% discount rate‚ the returns will be great only if everything remains
Premium Net present value Rate of return
exhibit 2) After calculating the FCF for all the projects‚ we got the IRR’s for each project. We got an IRR of 0% for project A‚ 32% for project B‚ 34% for project C‚ and 43% for project D. Similarly we got the NPV for each project using a WACC of 10% and 35%. Using the 10% WACC we got an NPV of -$1‚229‚980 for project A‚ and $3‚016‚880 for project B‚ and $5‚281‚910 for
Premium Net present value
000 and a 50 percent chance of a $13‚000 cash inflow. If the appropriate cost of capital is 10 percent‚ what is the project ’s expected NPV? Answer : $35 To find the NPV of the first outcome: NPV = -$500 - 1000/1.1 - 1000/(1.1)^2 + 16000/(1.1)^3 = $2‚347.48 The other NPVs can be found similarly. E(NPV) = 0.24($2‚347) + 0.24($94) + 0.32(-$1‚409) + 0.20(-$500) = $35. (The following information applies to the next two problems.) 3. Diplomat.com
Premium Net present value Cash flow
three years‚ which projects would you accept? “A‚ B‚ C” All the projects meet the given cutoff period‚ thus‚ every project (A‚ B‚ C) is acceptable. (In terms of NPV‚ since B has the highest NPV‚ B is the best option.) d. If the opportunity cost of capital is 10%‚ which projects have positive NPVs? “B & C” have the positive NPV at the capital cost of 10%. e.“If a firm uses a single cutoff period for all projects‚ it is likely to accept too many short- lived projects.” True or false?
Premium Net present value Internal rate of return