Informative Essay: All About Small Claims Courts Small Claims courts are a crucial aspect of the Canadian Legal system that could even be relevant to you one day. Small Claims courts are were created to try and give the average Joe a cheap‚ simple way to settle any type of arguments involving property or finances‚ without necessarily having to know a whole lot about law. You do not need to know many legal terms and the case usually consists of you telling your story for the judge to make
Premium Lawyer Dispute resolution Judge
of the claim can even be determined. Therefore‚ many claimants are usually unable to make an SFA with a solicitor‚ especially if the claim is of low value. Therefore‚ many claimants are unable to purse their claim and have no access to
Premium Common law Law Medicine
Rejection of Relative Claims and Acceptance of Objectivism Curtlers reasons for rejecting ethical relativism and subjectivism are many. However‚ before I discuss these reasons it is important to note that there are several forms of arguments. One being cultural relativism that makes statements based on an individuals culture. Another form that is closely related to relativism is subjectivism. Subjectivists make statements based on their individual beliefs as well as accounting for context. Subjectivists
Premium Morality Truth Cultural relativism
These claims can be judged‚ categorized‚ or valued. Although we can figure out how humans work using descriptive claims‚ the attempt to answer the central question of what makes a good life requires the use of normative claims. Any type of judgment makes a claim normative‚ even if only a single word such as “good” is expressed in the claim. This type of claim is not only used in ethics. For example‚ a marketing team uses normative claims by comparing past mistakes and achievements
Premium Ethics Philosophy Religion
What is the current status of the First Nations Land Claims in the Province of British Columbia? Assess the progress that has been made so far and provide some suggestions to expedite the process. The Canadian government says that it is dedicated to making its obligations to First Nations by discussing issues and bringing closure to all claims. Canada likes to underlie that by looking at the historic inequality and building strong partnerships among First Nations people; governments‚ and the
Premium First Nations Indigenous Australians Aboriginal peoples in Canada
False Claims Act *Position statement: The False Claims Act came about because the U.S. government was losing billions of dollars yearly to false claims that were submitted for payments of goods and services. *Background The False Claims Act was put into place during The American Civil War in 1965 when it was found that contractors sold The Union Army defective equipment and sick animals. To prohibit this from happening again Congress enacted The False Claim Act on March 2‚ 1963. Its intentions
Premium United States Congress Federal government of the United States False Claims Act
JW Apps claim of “A belief is what we accept as truth” can be interpreted differently through many people. Before we can start to defend or disagree with this claim‚ we must first understand the meaning of truth and belief. A truth is something that is known for certain‚ has been proven and is a certain fact. While as a belief may not necessary have to be true‚ it is more about what people accept and think that could be real. From this‚ we can say that it is possible to defend JW Apps claim as a belief
Premium Truth Epistemology Belief
Alberta‚ the timeline to have a claim served by personal service and regular mail are as listed by Alberta Courts: “The Civil Claim must be served on all Defendant(s) within 1 year of the date the claim was filed on. There are specific methods of service based on the type of Defendant named. A Civil Claim will expire one year after being issued if it has not been served. If the Plaintiff is unable to serve the Defendant within one year of being issued‚ the Civil Claim can be renewed within that year
Premium Law Court Jury
Ambiguous Claims Quiz I (See related pages) Your Results: The correct answer for each question is indicated by a . Identify the ambiguity in these examples. 1 "A claim whose ambiguity is due to the ambiguity of a particular word or phrase." B) Semantic ambiguity. 2 "A claim whose ambiguity is due to a problem with its structure." B) Syntactic ambiguity. 3 "A claim whose ambiguity rests on a confusion
Premium Ambiguity
Marta Wosinska led the conversation. The Propecia launch came at a time of regulatory change‚ which made advertising of prescription drugs to consumers more feasible. But Casola had to consider three limitations on such advertising: 1. A "product claim" ad could mention both the brand name of the drug and the problem it could correct‚ but would also have to include a list of major side effects. Trying to put side effects into context in a 30-second TV spot was next to impossible. 2. "Reminder" ads
Premium Pharmacology Physician Marketing