right to counsel is attached. Development of Right to Counsel In the 16th and 17th century‚ the law did not allow or provide for the use of attorneys in any court case‚ except for treason cases. It wasn’t until the 18th century in which the defendants were allowed to have an attorney. The constitution allowed for the use of attorneys‚ but most defendants represented themselves‚ while
Premium United States Constitution Law United States
INTRODUCTION TO STUDY In the Indian electronics industry for over 35 years the name O/E/N India Limited has been synonymous with precision‚ high quality electromechanical components like relays‚ switches‚ trimming potentiometers and allied assemblies. This is a report on organizational study conducted in O/E/N India Limited‚ and is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MBA.(Full time) Degree of the Mahatma Gandhi University. I have undertaken the study to learn about the
Premium Electronics Manufacturing Electronic engineering
In the 1950 case of P. Lorillard Co. v. Federal Trade Commission‚ P. Lorillard Co.‚ the makers of Old Gold cigarettes‚ were ordered to “cease and desist from making certain representations found to be false in the advertising of its tobacco products (Warner‚ et al.‚ 2012‚ p. 950) From a practical perspective in the 1950’s caveat emptor‚ or “let the buyer beware” is not a fair or reasonable expectation. While the careful consumer could have looked at the article‚ the culture of the time was not anti-smoking
Premium Law United States United States Constitution
Korematsu V. United States was a court case during the time of World War II. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor‚ people of Japanese descent were considered threats. As a result‚ Franklin Roosevelt issued the Executive Order 9066 on February 19‚ 1942. This Order demanded that each and every person of Japanese descent be moved to internment camps‚ regardless of citizenship. Fred Korematsu‚ a Japanese American citizen‚ refused to leave his home to go to the internment camp. Therefore‚ he was convicted
Premium United States World War II President of the United States
Bravo Fernandez v. United States is a court case that deals with Double Jeopardy. Double Jeopardy can be defined as “the prosecution of a person twice for the same offense (dictionary.com). ” Bravo Fernandez v. United States was argued on October 4th‚ 2016‚ because of an incident that took place in May of 2005. Mr. Fernandez‚ whom is the president of a private security firm in Puerto Rico‚ and Hector Martinez-Maldonado who is a member of the Senate. Both traveled to Las Vegas to watch a boxing match
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States Law
the Liberty Paints plant to the Brotherhood‚ with each microcosm endorsing a different idea of how blacks should behave in society. As the narrator attempts to define himself through the values and expectations imposed on him‚ he finds that‚ in each case‚ the prescribed role limits his complexity as an individual and forces him to play an inauthentic part. Upon arriving in New York‚ the narrator enters the world of the Liberty Paints plant‚ which achieves financial success by subverting blackness
Premium Black people Race Racism
Challenges of modern language The English language has been around for centuries now. It exists as a racially explosive language. Some words have been lost‚ changed‚ and added. This language often coincides with the American culture of the time. As the culture changes‚ so does the language. Offensive language has become common in today’s American culture‚ and stands as a regular part of the English language. The amount of offensive language heard on an everyday basis is astounding. There is no escaping
Premium Nigger African American Black people
Axis IV Recent awarding ceremony Problems related to the social environment: Death of friends Problems with primary support group: Unsolved grief Axis V GAF= 50 GAF= 65 SOFAS = 45 SOFAS = 70 Defensive Functioning Scale A. Current Defenses styles or Coping Style:
Premium Major depressive disorder Psychiatry Bipolar disorder
Question 1 The U.S. Constitution and the two early Supreme Court cases on corporations—Bank of the United States v. Deveaux et al. (1809) and Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819)—are official U.S. government documents that influenced early U.S. capitalist development. Whose viewpoints do they reflect? What are the main features of the vision of capitalism that they promote? How are these ideas similar to or different from those expressed in Joseph Story’s 1840 letter to Daniel Webster
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
race‚ color‚ sex‚ national origin‚ religion‚ disability or age. In the Supreme Court case‚ Griggs v. Duke Power Company (Duke)‚ it was decided that Duke used a selection process which had a disparate impact on the employment opportunities of members of a race‚ color‚ religion‚ sex‚ or national origin group. Disparate impact is sometimes confusing and tricky. In the case of the Albemarle Paper Company (Albemarle) v. Moody‚ proved just how tricky disparate impact is. Albemarle administered tests without
Premium Employment Audit Discrimination