process of sentencing (Roberts‚ 2013). The Criminal Justice Act 2003 identifies the main purposes for punishment. When allocating a sentence‚ any court sentencing an offender must regard: the punishment of the offender‚ the reduction of crime due to the punishment‚ the rehabilitation of the offender‚ the protection of the public and the ‘making a mends’ for those affected by the offending (Bartels‚ 2009). In England and Wales‚ in an attempt to improve consistency‚ guidelines for sentencing are used
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminal law
In the legal case (Unites States v Leon) On August 1981‚ police in Burbank received intel from an informant that Patsy Stewart and Armando Sanchez were selling narcotics from their personal residence. Police began surveillance of their home without a warrant and identified suspects Ricardo Del Castillo and Alberto Leon. Based on their investigation and information obtained from another informant‚ a warrant was obtained. A search of the residence was conducted‚ and large amounts of drug paraphernalia
Premium
Australia has nine sentencing jurisdictions with each jurisdiction possessing its own criminal justice system. Federal‚ state and territory criminal legislation generally specify offences with a prescribed maximum penalty which allows a court to determine an appropriate punishment in the particular circumstances of that case. In recent years‚ the Australian Parliament has increased proclaimed power over sentencing‚ setting a fixed or consistent penalty for committing a certain offence. This upsurge
Premium Law Crime Criminal justice
Engineering Failure Analysis 12 (2005) 720–745 www.elsevier.com/locate/engfailanal Best practice for the assessment of defects in pipelines – gouges and dents K.A. Macdonald b a‚* ‚ A. Cosham b a University of Stavanger‚ 4036 Stavanger‚ Norway Penspen Integrity‚ Newcastle Business Park‚ Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 7YL‚ UK Received 12 July 2004; accepted 13 December 2004 Available online 13 April 2005 Abstract Oil and gas transmission pipelines have a good safety record and
Premium
fundamental amendment people use nowadays. Included in the the First Amendment is freedom of speech which protect the citizens free expression. Freedom of speech let’s a citizen speak or express their own mind and opinion. The First Amendment in the United States Constitution gives us the freedom of speech. Freedom of speech gives us the right to say our own opinion on anything we want to speak on. As citizens of this country‚ we are able to say our opinion on the government‚ taxes‚ school‚ or anything that
Premium Freedom of speech Human rights United States Constitution
Sentencing is an “imposition of a penalty on a person convicted of a crime” (Schmalleger‚ 2014). Generally‚ sentencing is the last thing that occurs when an offender charged with a crime and the trial has ended. During a trial‚ each side will argue their case in front of a jury (if it is a jury trial); at which time said jury would deliberate and return with a verdict. Once the verdict comes back to the court‚ a date is set for sentencing. According to our textbook‚ “most sentencing decisions are
Premium Crime Jury Court
Republic of the Philippines BATAAN PENINSULA STATE UNIVERSITY Balanga City‚ Philippines ------------------------------------------------- COLLEGE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY ------------------------------------------------- TITLE PROPOSAL Project Title: A Proposed Online Document Management System for BPSU Summary The main feature of this website is the uploading form where the faculty members and dean of Departments could easily report‚ manage‚ upload and email their concerns
Premium Computer file President University
United States v. Lee (1982) This case involved a conflict between the beliefs of the Old Order Amish and government regulations on employment and Social Security. The Amish regard the care of the sick and elderly to be one of their religious obligations; as a consequence‚ they believe that paying Social Security taxes (designed to care for the sick and elderly) would entail acknowledging that the government had that task rather than they. Thus‚ paying Social Security taxes would mean denying an
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
The Korematsu v. United States (1944) case was an unjustifiable case towards individuals with a particular race‚ but even though at the moment it seemed like the appropriate action to take for the protection of the people in our country‚ the action towards this race was completely inappropriate and unconstitutional. During the War of World War II‚ the president of the United States‚ Franklin Roosevelt put a float the Executive Order 9066 that targeted individuals from the Pacific Coast of Japanese
Premium United States Franklin D. Roosevelt World War II
1. In the case of Hampton v. Snead State Community College (SSCC)‚ the one element that Hampton failed to establish of a prima facie case of racial discrimination was the forth element in the case. The forth element in the case stated‚ “SSCC treated similarly situated employees outside of Hampton’s protected class more favorably” (Hampton). According to the court‚ Hampton failed to establish the prima facie case of bring substantial evidence of employees of another race who were tried fairly. The
Premium Prima facie Arbitration Legal burden of proof