Environmental Dynamism‚ Capital Structure and Performance: A Theoretical Integration and an Empirical Test Author(s): Roy L. Simerly and Mingfang Li Source: Strategic Management Journal‚ Vol. 21‚ No. 1 (Jan.‚ 2000)‚ pp. 31-49 Published by: John Wiley & Sons Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094118 Accessed: 07/12/2009 10:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR ’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.
Premium Capital structure Finance
Competitive Advantage of Nations"‚ Free Press‚ New York‚ 1990. 2. Porter‚ M.E. ‚ 1985. “Competitive Advantage”‚ Free Press‚ New York‚ 1985. 3. Porter‚ M.E. ‚ 2008. “The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy”‚ Harvard business Review‚ January 2008. 4. Rumelt‚ R.P. ‚ 1984. “Toward a strategic theory of the firm”‚ in Robert B. Lamb‚ (ed.) Competitive Strategic Management‚ Prentice-Hall‚ Englewood Cliffs‚ NJ‚ 1984‚ pp. 557-570. 5. McGee‚ John and Howard Thomas‚ 1986. “Strategic groups: Theory‚ research and
Premium Strategic management Management
original approach (Yoffie and Kim‚ 2009). 4.2 Consonance The key strategy of innovation and emergent technology is an indication of the creation of social value‚ as mentioned by Rumelt‚ cited in Viney and Gleadle (2006) 4.3 Advantage HTC is able to maintain the value it creates‚ superior skills and resources‚ which Rumelt‚ cited in Viney and Gleadle (2006) indicates competitive advantage‚ together with a superior position 4.4 Financial analysis and business risk analysis An analysis of financial ratios
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone
In this paper i will analyse and evaluate competetivenes of Formula one Motorsport industry and its dynamic characterictisc influenced by external and internal factors to critically understand and explore strategic management thoery of sustained competetive advantege and its significant importance in order of carrier succes of any Formula one constructors . I will try to clerly identify external and internal issues and changes ‚ affecting (facing ) development of sustainable competetive advantage
Premium Formula One Strategic management
DIVERSIFICATION AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL EVALUATION Anil M. Pandya and Narendar V. Rao Abstract Diversification is a strategic option that many managers use to improve their firms’ performance. This interdisciplinary research attempts to verify whether firm level diversification has any impact on performance. The study finds that on average‚ diversified firms show better performance compared to undiversified firms on both risk and return dimensions. It also tests the robustness of these
Premium Rate of return Financial ratios Cash flow
(1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review‚ 14 (2)‚ 147-166. Rugman‚ A. (1980) ‘Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: a re-appraisal of the literature’‚ Weltwirt-schaftliches Archive 116: 365–379. Rumelt‚ R. P. (1984). Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.)‚ Competitive Strategic Management: 556-570. Englewood Cliffs‚ NJ: Prentice-Hall. Sony. (2013). Haettu 11 2013 osoitteesta www.sony.net: http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/History/SonyHistory/1-01
Premium International trade Business Globalization
and Sustaining Superior Performance‚ Free Press‚ New York. Porter‚ M.E. 1988‚ ‘Managing Value: From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy’‚ The McKinsey Quarterly‚ pp. 43-59. Porter‚ M.E. 1994‚ ‘Toward a dynamic theory of strategy’‚ in R.P. Rumelt‚ D.E. Schendel and D.J. Teece (eds)‚ Fundamental Issues in Strategy‚ Harvard Business School Press‚ Boston‚ pp. 423 – 61. Prahalad‚ C.K.‚ and Hamel‚ G. 1990‚ ‘The Core Competence of the Corporation’‚ Harvard Business Review‚ 68(3)‚ May-June‚ pp 79-93
Premium Strategic management
www.ccsenet.org/ass Asian Social Science Vol. 8‚ No. 10: August 2012 Managing Stakeholders: An Integrative Perspective on the Source of Competitive Advantage Minyu Wu’ ’ School of Business‚ Curtin Universify Sarawak‚ Sarawak‚ Malaysia Correspondence: Minyu Wu‚ School of Business‚ Curtin Universify Sarawak‚ CDT 250‚ 98009 Miri‚ Sarawak‚ Malaysia. Tel: 60-8-544-3844. E-mail: minyu.wu@curtin.edu.my Received: March 19‚ 2012 doi:10.5539/ass.v8nl0pl60 Abstract Despite the enormous amount of academic
Premium Strategic management Management
Corporate Level Strategy (Video 1) Corporate Level Strategy describes the entire strategic scope of the organization. This is the panoramic view of the organization. It is the strategy by which an organization decides in which product or service markets to compete and in which geographical regions to operate. Normally the organizations‚ who have multiple businesses‚ use corporate level strategy for allocation and distribution of resources i.e. how cash‚ equipment‚ staffing‚ and other resources are
Premium Management Strategic management Business
Princeton University Press Rorty‚ R (1989) Contingency‚ Irony‚ and Solidarity Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Rouleau‚ L & F Seguin (1995) ‘Strategy and organization theories: common forms of discourse’ Journal of Management Studies 32(1)101-17 Rumelt‚ PR (1974) Strategy‚ Structure‚ and Economic Performance Cambridge: Harvard University Schendel‚ D (1994) ‘Introduction to the summer 1994 special issue -- ‘strategy: search for new paradigms’ Strategic Management Journal 15: 1-4 Sharp‚ B & J Dawes
Premium Strategic management Management