SCHEDULE “A” 1. The Plaintiffs claim from the Defendants: (a) payment of the sum of $25‚000.00; (b) pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the sum of $25‚000.00 calculated pursuant to the Courts of Justice Act‚ R.S.O. 1990‚ c.C43‚ as amended; (c) costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis; and (d) such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just. 2. The Plaintiff‚ Nayan Patel (“Nayan”) is an individual now residing in Barrie‚ Ontario. Nayan
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Depreciation
NIRMA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF LAW A CASE COMMENT SUBMITTED FOR THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE FIVE YEARS INTEGRATED DEGREE OF LAW HONOURS ON ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. VS. STATE OF U.P‚ 1997 JURISPRUDENCE LAW COURSE CODE: 11BL603 COURSE: B.com.L.L.B (HONS) SEMESTER-VI JANUARY 2014- MAY 2014 SUBMITTED TO - SUBMITTED BY- Ms. Rejitha Nair Yash Patel Roll no
Premium Rights Law Civil and political rights
Case Brief A.4 GNAZZO v. G.D. SEARLE & CO. 973 F.2d 136 (1992) U.S. Court of Appeals‚ Second Circuit Pierce‚ Circuit Judge Facts: On November 11‚ 1974‚ Gnazzo had an intrauterine device (IUD) inserted in her uterus for contraceptive purposes. The IUD was developed‚ marketed and sold by G.D. Searle & Co. (Searle). When Gnazzo’s deposition was taken‚ she stated that her doctor had informed her that “the insertion would hurt‚ but not for long‚” and that she “would have uncomfortable and probably
Premium Civil procedure Causality Complaint
Appeals Court in this case did not focus on the clearly disturbing behavior of the harasser. Instead‚ they focused on the defendant’s (the city’s) claim that they could not be held liable because knowledge of the harassing behavior on the part of the officer’s supervisor did not constitute knowledge on the part of the city. The court dismissed this claim. One of the issues discussed at length by the court had to do with the rank of the supervisor who had knowledge of the harassing behavior. The city
Premium Police Appeal Constable
Lynes about their advertisement regarding an injection packer and decided purchased several of them only later to find that they did not perform properly. Plaintiff decided to file suit‚ under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)‚ the plaintiff claim that there was a breach of an express warranty by the defendant. The acquired good did not perform. A jury in the state of Kansas found in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals the decision. Facts: Transamerica Oil Corporation is looking
Premium Warranty Contract Contract law
Investigating the ethical claims of The Body Shop‚ assessing how far it lives up to those claims XIAOMAN TAN TAXIC2A ILSC for the Business Professional ILSBUS Gill Marshall Date: Wednesday 5th December 4pm Word count: 1604 Abstract This
Premium Human rights The Body Shop Animal rights
To: Candy Land Toy Company Legal Department From: (NAME)‚ Human Resources Date: (DATE) Re: Mr. David Madison: Constructive Discharge Lawsuit Overview: Demand for our products has grown‚ and to meet that demand we have had to change the production work schedules. Mr. Madison did resign after the schedule change took effect‚ and after leaving filed a lawsuit calling for constructive discharge and contends it was based on religious discrimination. Research: According to Title VII of
Premium Faith Religion United States
hiring processes permitted racial bias against both Dunlap and other black applicants (Walsh‚ 2010). The Appeals Court affirmed the disparate treatment claim‚ reversed the disparate impact claim‚ and affirmed the district court’s award of damages and fees to Mr. Dunlap (Walsh‚ 2010). 2. Explain why the plaintiff’s disparate (adverse) impact claim failed. The disparate impact theory requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that an apparently neutral employment practice affects
Premium Racism Appeal Prima facie
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Case No. 81-1505 Transamerica Oil Corporation‚ Plaintiff-Appellee‚ v. Lynes‚ Inc. and Baker International Corporation‚ Defendants-Appellants. 723F.2d 758; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14288; 37 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1076 ------------------------------------------------- December 21‚ 1983 PROCEDURAL POSTURE Plaintiff brought suit under the Kansas Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to recover damages resulting from the breach of an
Premium Warranty Appeal Jury
A family is defined in the dictionary as "a social unit consisting of people who are related by blood or law." There are many different definitions of family‚ some more specific then others; sociologists tend to use a more specific definition‚ which can vary according to the sociologist. There are different types of family; there are the more commonly-known ones‚ such as nuclear and extended‚ but there are also names for a mother-and-child family (matrifocal) and a father-and-child family (consanguineal)
Free Sociology Marriage Mother