King v Cogdon Minerva Rodriguez Criminal Law 1310 22 April 2013 Professor Holden Case: King v Cogdon King v Cogdon‚ was an Australian case heard in 1950. Ms. Cogdon who suffers from minor neurotic conditions is believed to be her daughter’s murderer. She had on an occasion dreamt spiders were attacking her daughter (Pat). That night Ms. Cogdon had slept walked into her room and began to violently brush the spiders off her daughter’s
Premium Psychosis Psychiatry Sleep
Customer Relationship Management Helps Chase Card Services Manage Customer Calls Q1: what function of customer relationship management systems are illustrated in this case? Ans: The functions of customer relationship management systems that are illustrated are touch point‚ which is a method of interaction with the customer such as a telephone‚ email‚ customer service desk‚ conventional mail‚ website‚ wireless device or retail store. Another CRM system that is used is an Analytical CRM which
Premium Customer relationship management
narrow and clear in the contract‚ including an enumeration of examples such as market research data‚ sales plans and advertising strategies. In Mainmet Holdings plc v Austin‚ the defendant was held not in breach of confidence‚ because the reports about defects in customers’ systems are not considered as trade secrets.[ Mainmet Holdings plc v Austin [1991] F.S.R. 538] It would be easier to determine the nature of the reports if the corporation has specifically stated that as confidential information in
Premium Confidentiality Law Employment
After reading both Plato’s Symposium and Saint Augustine’s Confessions‚ one can see how the latter holds certain ideas and concepts that are parallel to those found in the former. Despite the differences in time‚ men are hindered from their pursuit of goodness‚ truth‚ etcetera‚ by similar‚ if not entirely identical‚ desires. That being said‚ of all of the speeches found in the Symposium‚ Augustine would connect most deeply to that of Alcibiades. Alcibiades is depicted as a prominent Athenian statesman
Premium Plato God Socrates
Miranda v. Arizona American Government This case is one that changed the way the United States Police forces will work forever. Every human in the world has natural born rights. Even people who have been arrested have rights‚ ‘The rights of the accused’. These rights are the main point of this court case. ‘On the third of March in 1963‚ an eighteen year old girl‚ “Lois Ann Jameson” (Sonneborn 6)‚ was leaving Paramount Theaters in downtown Phoenix’ (Sonneborn 7). Jameson would always take the bus
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States
BRENNAN‚ J.‚ Opinion of the Court SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 491 U.S. 397 Texas v. Johnson CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS No. 88-155 Argued: March 21‚ 1989 --- Decided: June 21‚ 1989 JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. After publicly burning an American flag as a means of political protest‚ Gregory Lee Johnson was convicted of desecrating a flag in violation of Texas law. This case presents the question whether his conviction is consistent
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution
An individual possesses culpable knowledge only if he knows or strongly suspects the results of his actions will cause harm to another. Balachova v. Mukasey‚ 547 F. 3d at 379. In Balachova v. Mukasey‚ the alien was in the military and aided his fellow soldiers in rounding up several young women from a village and placing them in transport vehicles. Id. He physically placed the young girls‚ against their will in the vehicles‚ the military unit proceeded to take the girls to a different location where
Premium Law Legal terms United States
Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
NOTES OF CASES THECASEOF THE SLIPPERY EQUITY IN Re Vandervell’s Trusts (No. 2)‚’ Lord Denning M.R. said: “ (‘ Hard cases make bad law ’) is a maxim which is quite misleading. It should be deleted from our vocabulary. It comes to this: ‘Unjust decisions make good law’: whereas they do nothing of the kind. Every unjust decision is a reproach to the law or to the judge who administers it.”a Now that it has been decided that there is to be no appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal‚ it is worth
Premium Law Common law Criminal law
certificate unit PWCS 22. Where criteria have been covered is outlined in the table below: Assessment Criteria for PWCS 22 (tech cert) Question it has been covered in PWCS 22 – 1.1 Question 3 PWCS 22 – 1.2 Question 5 PWCS 22 – 1.3 Question 2 PWCS 22 – 2.1 Question 8 PWCS 22 – 2.2 Question 6 PWCS 22 – 2.3 Question 4 PWCS 22 – 3.1 Question 7 PWCS 22 – 3.2 Question 7 PWCS 22 – 3.3 Question 7 PWCS 22 – 3.4 Question 7 This assignment workbook will also cover some criteria for unit SHC 22 of the Level 2 Diploma
Premium UCI race classifications Tour de Georgia