Case Background 1st Plaintiff – The World Food Fair Limited (formerly know as wealth state Investments Limited) 2nd Plaintiff – The World Enterprises Holdings Limited Defendant – Hong Kong Island Development Limited (Owner of shopping mall and two plaintiffs are the owners of retail shops) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In 1996‚ after conference‚ the plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant for breach of
Premium Contract Leasehold estate
not apply to this case since the acceptance of the offer is communicated by voicemail. The rule with regard to acceptance by such methods is that the contract is complete only when acceptance is received by Amanda. According to the case of Entored Ltd v. Miles Far East Corp(1955)2‚ the court held that a contract was made between the parties when the defendant’s acceptance was received by the plaintiff in London. Applying the case to the current issue‚ although the voicemail shown that Tracy was willing
Premium Contract Offer and acceptance
Faverty v McDonald’s Restaurants of Oregon‚ Inc. 892 P.2D 703 (CT. APP. OR. 1995) Facts: Matt Theurer was an 18 year old adult that worked at McDonald’s part time. His friends and family worried about him because he had many extra-curricular activities‚ worked for the National Guard‚ and worked for McDonalds. McDonald’s informal policy did not allow high school students to work more than one midnight shift per week or split shifts. There was a special clean-up week McDonald’s held‚ Theurer worked
Premium Alcoholic beverage Law High school
INDEX CONTENTS Page No. Introduction 1 Issues Raised 1 Rules Applicable 5 Analysis 8 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 11 N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P 1994 (6) SCC 205 Introduction India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept‚ human beings‚ by virtue of their humanity‚ ought to
Premium Constitution of India Law Government of India
A STUDY ON THE PROMOTIONAL STRATEGIES OF IDBI FEDERAL LIFE INSURANCE CO LTD 1. Abstract of the paper The paper deals with the study of the promotional strategies of IDBI federal life insurance co ltd vis-à-vis its various competitors like LIC‚ SBI life‚ ICICI prudential‚ etc. The paper aims at the various promotional strategies adopted by the company to make information available‚ about its products‚ to its potential customers. The primary objective of the paper is to find out whether the
Premium Insurance
10-K Integration Project – Analyst Preparation Assignment Nanette Guzman Honda Motor Co.‚ LTD May 23‚ 2013 PESTLE 1. Political: Total industry automobile sales in Japan for fiscal year 2012 rose approximately 3% to approximately 4.75 million units. Although the Great East Japan Earthquake and the floods in Thailand had an impact‚ automobile sales remained stable due to government stimulus policies that provided tax breaks and subsidies for eco-car purchases in the second half of the
Premium Management Strategic management Marketing
The aspects are the connection or relationship between the contracting parties and the degree of imbalance between the loss suffered by plaintiff and the stipulated liquidated damages. A good relevant case is Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 222 ALR 306. Ringeow and BP entered an agreement in 2005 to purchase a service station. The agreement required Ringrow to purchase fuel only from BP and allowed BP to buy the service station in case of reach of the agreement. After
Premium
The Plaintiff‚ Sullivan (Plaintiff) sued the Defendant‚ the New York Times Co. (Defendant)‚ for printing an advertisement about the civil rights movement in the south that defamed the Plaintiff. New York Times vs. Sullivan Defamation can be defined as a written or spoken statement that subjects someone to hatred or ridicule or injures a person’s occupation or business. This case was decided on March 9th‚ 1964 by unanimous decision. Justice Brennan delivered the opinion of the Court and concurrences
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States
instance in Taylor v. Brighton Borough Council a departmental regulation (town planning scheme) required that any fun fair organized within a particular area would require prior permission of the concerned local authority. This provision was challenged as unreasonable. Justice Greene held that it was not justified to adjudge a departmental regulation on the same principle as that of a bye-law. The court could only check if the regulation was within the scope of the primary legislation. (v) The Wednesbury’s
Premium Law Property Common law
For the case of Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009]‚ the appellant engaged the respondent as contractor in a construction project. The appellant repudiated the contract by wrongly calling on the respondent’s bank guarantee‚ in response to which the respondent terminated the contract and claimed damages for quantum meruit. The Court of Appeal applied the NSW Court of Appeal decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 which provided that
Premium Law Appeal Jury