INDUSTRY PROFILE Sugarcane belongs to the genus SACCHARAM. The word Sugar is as derived from the Sanskrit word SHARAKARA fro which the word SACCHARAM seems to have been derived indicates the antiquity of knowledge of sugarcane in India. Sugar Industry is the second largest agro based industry in India next to textiles‚ producing an all time record of 400 lakes tones of direct plantation sugar as on 30th April 2005. It has emerged as the largest vacuum pan sugar producer in the world.
Premium Sugar Sucrose
Study Methodology of the Study Limitations of the Study Prelude: The introductory issues focus on some vital points. Since the selected sample is "RENWIC‚ JAJNESWAR & CO. (BD) LTD". So all of its information is related along with this company. They are cited below. 1.1 Statement of the Problem: Financial Statements are derived from a historical cost-based accrual accounting system employing system employing generally
Premium Balance sheet Financial statements Financial ratio
Fareast Islami Life Insurance Co. Ltd. emerged as the 1st full-fledged Islami Life Insurance Company in the country in 2000 and has‚ by the grace of Almighty Allah‚ been able to bring confidence among the common people of the country. As a result‚ in 2010 the Company has earned a total premium of Tk. 651.36 crore showing an increase of 3.2% over the previous year which is no doubt a remarkable achievement. Last year they had taken a holistic approach in doing business‚ with focus on quality customer
Premium Investment Economics Islam
In Keighley‚ Maxted & Co v Durant (1901)‚ A was authorized by P to buy wheat at 44s 3d a quarter on a joint account for A and P. Wheat was unobtainable at this price and‚ therefore‚ A agreed to buy from T at 44s 6d a quarter. Though he intended to buy it on behalf of himself and P‚ A contracted in his own name and did not disclose the agency to T. The next day P ratified the purchase at the unauthorized price but‚ in due course‚ P and A failed to take delivery. It was held by the House of Lords
Premium Appeal Contract
James Leamon Johnson & Wales University Law 2001 Professor Bertron 01 Feb 2014 Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez Briefly explain the opinion. Which of Martinez’s claims were successful and which were not? Why (what was the court’s legal explanation)? In this case‚ Martinez brought forward three claims. First‚ he claimed strict product liability based on defective design of the tire. Martinez also claimed negligence and gross negligence. In their ruling‚ the jury found that the defective design
Premium Jury Tort Law
Smoke Ball Co. Ltd published an advertisement in Pall Mall Gazzette offering that they would pay a sum of 100 pound to anyone who got contracted with influenza after using its product following the instructions provided with the smoke ball and they had deposited 1000 pound in the Alliance Bank to prove their seriousness over the advertisement. The plaintiff used their product but still contracted influenza. The plaintiff sued the company for 100 pound. But yet‚ Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Ltd mentioned
Premium Contract Invitation to treat Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company
CASE NOTE: JA PYE (OXFORD) LTD V UK1 For many years‚ there has been a certain ethical discomfort with the doctrine of adverse possession. Recently‚ this‚ this criticism has culminated in accusationsthataccusations that the law in this area violates the human rights of land owners.2 Over the next few pages I examine the case of JA PYE (OXFORD) LTD v UK. . I believe that the judgment in this case should be welcomed as it may help to clarifyclarifies the law in Ireland in this area. 3 I. THE FACTS
Premium Property Law Ownership
Page 1 All England Law Reports/1990/Volume 1 /Williams v Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd - [1990] 1 All ER 512 [1990] 1 All ER 512 Williams v Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd COURT OF APPEAL‚ CIVIL DIVISION PURCHAS‚ GLIDEWELL AND RUSSELL LJJ 2‚ 3‚ 23 NOVEMBER 1989 Contract - Consideration - Performance of contractual duty - Performance of existing contractual duty - Agreement to pay additional money to ensure performance of existing contractual duty - Whether sufficient consideration
Premium Contract
Annie hired a removal firm‚ XY & Co‚ to move the contents of her housein Plymouth to a house which she had bought in Worcester. The removal van and all its contents were destroyed by fire in a layby just outside Exeter. Some time after the loss‚ Annie was told by an employee of XY & Co that the van had been deliberately set on fire so that XY & Co could claim from their insurers for its loss. Annie is suing XY & Co for the value of her destroyed property‚ which she estimates to be £250‚000. She
Premium Pleading Pleading Evidence
Gilford Motor Co V S Horne(1933) Horne was appointed Managing Director Gilford Motor Co 6-year term. He appointed by a written agreement says he will not solicit customers for their own purposes and whether he is a general manager or after he left. In order to avoid the effect of the agreement‚ Horne left Gilford Motor Co. and started his own company. Johnson’s company provides car accessories of Gilford Motor Co’s car in a weaken price and the shareholder of Gilford Motor being his associate in
Premium Subsidiary Subsidiary Corporation