The Merger of HP-Compaq Case Question 1: Was the merger sound strategically? HP was already a famous global company in 1990s. Although innovation was still critical to long-term success‚ HP’s industry was maturing and with that came the additional pressure of slimming margins‚ the importance of distribution efficiencies‚ and a more critical need for developing long-term relationships with customer. Although HP was the market leader in imaging and printing‚ its computing and IT-services businesses
Premium Economics Corporation
|C| | |o| | |l| | |o| | |m| | |b| | |o| | |W| | |a| | |s| | |t| | |e| | |M| | |a| | |n| | |a| | |g| | |e| | |m| | |e| | |n| | |t| | | | | | | | |D| | |u| | |e| | |t| | |o| | |t| | |h| | |e| | |n| | |u| | |m| | |e| | |r| | |o| | |u| | |s| | |a| | |r| | |t| | |i| | |c| | |l| | |e| | |s| | |o| | |n| | |t| | |h| | |i| | |s| | |i| | |s| | |s| | |u| | |e| | |I| | |h| | |a| | |v| | |e| | |d| | |e| | |c| | |i| | |d| | |e| | |d| | |t| | |o| | |s| | |t| | |a| | |r| | |t| | |t| | |h| | |i| | |s| | |t| | |h|
Premium
SAMSUNG LEARNING POINTS This is a great case dealing with the “big picture/helicopter vision”. It is an ideal case to get us started. Below are the main learning points. There may also be other things you learnt from the class‚ that are not listed here. Think about how you can take some of these learning points back to your own companies and context‚ and apply them. The case teaches us: - about moving from a production/selling orientation to a market orientation. This is really really
Premium Marketing Market failure Capitalism
Another key factor in understanding problems faced by Samsung in dealing with the new generation of “digital natives” is to understand not only broad national traits mentioned before‚ but specifically the work ethics prevalent in Korean businesses. The case mentions that South Korea has the longest working week hours among all OECD countries. But this information appears dry until you realize specific reasons why those hours are so long. Some of the examples are: Our recommendation in hiring an
Premium Samsung Electronics South Korea Korea
envision the farmer‚ tending his crops; the baker selling his goods. One thing that does not come to mind is Genetically Modified Organisms. Everywhere we turn‚ GMOs are popping up at an alarming rate. The scary thing is that many people are not even aware they are consuming these products. As of now‚ companies who manufacture GMOs are not required to label their products as such. These foods that are consumed by millions of people every day are still permitted to be labeled as "all natural
Premium
David‚ I truly enjoyed reading your primary task posting regarding the pros and cons of mandatory GMO labeling this week. Furthermore‚ similar to you‚ I thought it was highly important to provide a clear definition of a GM or GMO product at the beginning of my primary task. In addition‚ you cited an exceedingly interesting fact‚ one I had not found during my research‚ that in almost all study cases the GM crops produced 6 to 11 percent less yields for studied soybean crops (Exposed: the great
Premium Genetically modified organism Genetically modified food DNA
package should tell us the things they put in these Genetically Modified Organisms or GMOs for short. They should do this because: we do not know what harmful things are in the foods‚ the side effects it has on other foods too‚ and no real testing has been done to prove these foods are even okay for us to eat. These foods should have labels because we do not know what they contain in them. The company that produces GMOs do not put what they crossed with whatever we eat. Which means that we could be eating
Premium Genetically modified organism Genetically modified food Genetic engineering
What exactly was covered in the great Patent Trial of the Century between Apple and Samsung? I’ve had a surprisingly hard time figuring this out. However‚ after reading the verdict‚ the patents themselves‚ and a bunch of news summaries‚ it seems to me that there may be less than meets the eye here. As near as I can tell‚ the jury found Samsung guilty of violating the following Apple patents: Patent 381‚ which covers inertial scrolling (the faster you move your finger‚ the faster a list scrolls)
Premium Apple Inc. Jury Invention
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0309-0566.htm EJM 44‚7/8 Consumer responses to brand extensions: a comprehensive model ´ ´ Eva Martınez and Jose M. Pina ´ Facultad de Ciencias Economicas y Empresariales‚ The University of Zaragoza‚ Zaragoza‚ Spain Abstract Purpose – This paper aims to understand the reciprocal spill-over effects of brand extensions by testing a comprehensive model that gathers both the brand extension evaluation
Premium Branding Brand equity Brand
Strength * Samsung enjoys the widest range of product portfolio which includes Mobile phone‚ Tablet‚ TV/Audio/Video‚ Camera‚ camcorder‚ Home appliance‚ pc‚ peripherals‚ printer‚ memory cards and other accessories * Samsung holds significant market share in most of the product categories * Samsung is NO.2 in terms of market share in mobiles‚ it captured Nokia’s market share by superior innovation in smart phones * Samsungs is the best in terms of design features and technology. It
Premium Mobile phone Product management