of the reasons Nokia has fallen so fast is that it has a simple branding problem: Nokia isn’t a distinctive brand. It is a brand with positive associations and high awareness‚ but it isn’t unique. For many years‚ Nokia seemed to successfully do what marketing experts say you can’t do: serve all segments in a market. Nokia sold very high-end‚ technologically advanced phones and simple‚ inexpensive phones‚ all under the Nokia brand. The branding structure was very simple: the Nokia brand with a product
Premium Marketing
analysis of the Samsung company because I spend a full year in South-Korea‚ from july 2011 until august 2012. Hence‚ Samsung is an extremely important conglomerate in this country‚ working there is for many considered as a « dream-job » and furthemore produce as much as 20% as the country total exports. Samsung is well known for their electronic product created by the electronic subsidiaries of the company‚ Sansung Electronics. Their flagship phone‚ currently being the Samsung Galaxy S3 sold over
Premium Samsung Electronics Samsung Group Chaebol
COUNTRY REPRESENT •Finnish Company •Nokianvirta river Nokia‚ Finland YEAR OF BIRTH Company started in 1865 as wood pulp mill. After 1963 Nokia started producing radio telephone COMPANY PRODUCT Early products: Wood pulp Rubber Cables and Television Main Product: Mobile Phone‚ Smart Phone‚ Mobile Computers‚ etc. FOUNDER OF THE COMPANY •The company was initially founded by Fredrik Idestam in 1865 •But it was later converted into a share company
Free Mobile phone Nokia
1.1 The Morph concept The “Nokia Morph” is a theoretical future device based on nanotechnology that might enable future communication devices. It is intended to demonstrate the flexibility of future mobile devices‚ in regards to their shape and form allowing the users to transform them according to their preference. It demonstrates the ultimate functionality that nanotechnology might be capable of delivering i.e. flexible materials‚ transparent electronics and self-cleaning surfaces. It also features
Premium Nanotechnology
CASE ANALYSIS MEMO TO: Samsung Management FROM: Team 3 DATE: March 27‚ 2014 SUBJECT: Samsung Case Analysis Executive Summary Samsung Electronics Company (Samsung) is a South Korean multinational electronics manufacturer with headquarters in Suwon‚ South Korea. It’s a flagship subsidiary of the Samsung Group and by the end of 2004 was responsible for $78.5 billion of the group’s $135 billion revenue (Chang & Siegel‚ 2009). It is a major manufacturer of component
Premium Flash memory Samsung Electronics
Nokia Connects: A Case study Alyssa Crowder Bus 302 Professor Day 4/27/10 What are the opportunities associated with being first into a major new country market? What are the risks? There are many benefits of being the first company to introduce your product on the market in a new country. One advantage would be gaining sales and popularity‚ by introducing your brand new product. But before they decide to launch their product in a new country‚ the company needs to research the target
Premium Mobile phone
The beginning of Nokia goes back to the year 1865 with the establishment of a forestry industry enterprise in South-Western Finland by mining engineer Fredrick Idestam. While in the year 1898‚ the Finnish Rubber Works Ltd was found‚ and in 1912‚ Finnish Cable Works began operations. Gradually‚ the ownership of this two companies and Nokia began to shift into hands of just a few owners. Finally‚ these three companies were merged to form Nokia Corporation in 1967. Nokia Corporation engages in the
Free Mobile phone Nokia
Nokia Case Problem statement Until recently‚ the mobile phone industry’s sole profitable market was the developed one. Today‚ low end‚ emerging markets are growing rapidly and are proving to be profitable; the emerging market accounts for 60% of Nokia’s revenues alone. Determining which market to target affects both the production of phones as well as the services that need to be developed. Nokia is now faced with two options: should they continue operating in both the developed and emerging
Premium Developed country Mobile phone Nokia
Why did Nokia fail in Indian market? 1. Lession from the Corporate http://books.google.com.au/books?id=yPC5BAAAQBAJ&pg=PA339&lpg=PA339&dq=how+nokia+failed+to+connect+indian+market&source=bl&ots=M1GR8b7x_k&sig=VpqxqvlcvJ7Jb6Dgiq6tCqcEk9E&hl=en&sa=X&ei=nB5nVMaLK8O4mwWr64LgDw&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=how%20nokia%20failed%20to%20connect%20indian%20market&f=false Nokia vs Micromax (Developmental (NPD)‚ Distribution‚ and Price Flexibility): Although Nokia is still a major player of Indian mobile
Premium Smartphone Mobile phone Nokia
globalization‚ people can sell anywhere take advantage of a country’ resources (cheap labour‚ human intellect‚ lower taxes etc.) take advantage of a country’s less strict labour laws (ex. child labour) · Was the German backlash against Nokia justifiedadd your own opinion? How can nations make themselves more competitive? · New plant developed would be to maximize output in production to Europe‚ Middle East and Africa · Other manufacturers (ex. BenQ [bankrupt]‚ Motorola)
Premium Middle East Labour relations Supply and demand