"Satisfactory moral theory by james rachels" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 1 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Rachels

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James Rachels argues against theories of selfishness that the psychological egoists maintain. He challenges the view that everyone always does what he or she wants by showing that we often dounpleasant tasks for the future pleasures or from obligation. Altruism is recognized as not acting in self interest. He also clears up the confusions that selfishness and self interest share the same meaning. *Psychological egoists argue that we always do what we want to do. Rachel says that is questionable and

    Free Altruism Ethical egoism Egoism

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Rachels

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The philosopher James Rachels has an argument that shows that the distinction between acts and omissions is not as helpful as it looks. Consider these two cases: •Smith will inherit a fortune if his 6 year old cousin dies. •One evening Smith sneaks into the bathroom where the child is having his bath and drowns the boy. •Smith then arranges the evidence so that it looks like an accident. •Jones will inherit a fortune if his 6 year old cousin dies. •One evening Jones sneaks into the bathroom where

    Premium Morality Doctor Who KILL

    • 551 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jame Rachels Essay

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary: Active and Passive Euthanasia (James Rachels) James Rachels argues against the traditional doctrine in medicine that prohibits the physician from taking any action which would contribute to the death of a patient. Rachels takes the position that in some cases‚ abiding by this doctrine leads to more suffering. In the situation where continued medical support would prolong suffering‚ doctors have the option of discontinuing support. If‚ according to Rachel‚ they choose that option on the basis

    Premium Morality Medicine Physician

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Rachels Virtues

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In James Rachels’ books‚ The Elements of Moral Philosophy‚ the chapter made several points about virtue. Virtue can be defined in different ways and mean different per every person. But‚ virtue needs to bring good morals and be justified with good reasons. Good characteristic makes a person virtuous. Should Virtue Ethics be practice again? Definition of virtue brings a lot of competent. Structures of virtue‚ can set many explanations and problems. But‚ virtue is important because the upright morals

    Premium Virtue Ethics

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rachels and Brock James Rachels’ thoughts on active and passive euthanasia come down to the idea that there is no moral difference between both active and passive euthanasia. That simply they are functionally equivalent. Rachels’ argument stems from the AMA’s stance on euthanasia. The AMA believes the intentional termination of one’s life is contrary to “that for which the medical profession stands.” However‚ it is wrong to prolong the needless suffering of patients who are dying. Therefore

    Premium Death Euthanasia Medicine

    • 1991 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    James Rachels ’ Death and Dying James Rachels is one of the most controversial philosophers talked about in today ’s society. One of his most talked about topics is whether a person has a right to die or not. Not much is known about Rachels expect for the many articles and books he has written. In the controversy of letting a person die or killing him‚ he does not try to explain which method is good and which method is bad. He however tries to explain why they both are bad to a certain degree

    Free Death Euthanasia Suicide

    • 1762 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and the Bible In James Rachels’ “Ethics and the Bible‚” Rachels analyzes the use of the Bible to answer moral and ethical questions. He first points to the issue of clear teachings versus interpretations of the meaning behind. Those who use the Bible to answer ethical questions run into two problems‚ one that the Bible does not explicitly answer every ethical question‚ and two there are some instructions that religious people give reasons to ignore. Rachels finds this to be problematic. In

    Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Safety 2. 2. Ability to work with others 3. 3. Contribution to the company’s long term growth 4. 4. Contributions to productivity 5. 5. Cost control 6. 6. Attendance During the past two years‚ Simpson gave each employee a “satisfactory” (3) rating on all six dimensions. Based on what he has observed during his first two months as manager. Andrew believes those ratings are erroneous. Six engineers have quickly surfaced as outstanding performers and three are clearly unsatisfactory

    Premium Employment Performance appraisal The Unit

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    What is Morality. James Rachels is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Alabama and author of several books dating back to his first book End of Life: Euthanasia and Morality(1986). In Rachels essay “What is Morality- The Elements of Moral Philosophy”‚ Rachels believes that “minimum conception”(14) of morality is‚ at the very least‚ the effort to guide one’s conduct by reason while considering others who will be affected by it as well. This “minimum conception”(Rachels‚1) he urges‚ is a

    Premium Morality Ethics Religion

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral Theory

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Paper 1: Moral Theory Cultural Relativism Arguments For: (Freedom of expression (Know one has the right to judge moral practices of other cultures (No universal moral code Arguments Against: (There is no absolute truth (Wrong actions could be right (Cultures don’t have to have any good reasons for their moral views (Truth is whatever you believe “What courts as a decent human being is relative to historical circumstance‚ a matter of transient consensus about

    Premium Ethics Morality Cultural relativism

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
Previous
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50