Case Study of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co. Andrew William Pence Liberty University Abstract Palsgraf was severely injured due to a blast that shook the railroad station. The unmarked package of fireworks that was dropped by another party boarding a moving train caused the explosion. The explosion caused large iron scales to fall on Plasgrof. As a result‚ Palsgraf sued the Long Island Railroad for the conductor’s negligence‚ whom she blames for pulling the commuter on the train. Which
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Law New York
W Marbury v Madison 1803 will forever and always be a Supreme Court Case that will live infamously in today’s history. During the election of 1800 against incumbent president John Adams of the Federalist Party versus the Anti-Federalist Party nominee Thomas Jefferson‚ with Jefferson being the victor. Before Adams were to leave the presidential office‚ he made what is called “midnight appointments” of new judgeships to counter act the Jeffersonians once in office. John Marshall‚ who was secretary
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)FactsMarbury was commissioned to serve as a judge by former president John Adam. The former Secretary of State and the present Chief Justice John Marshall failed to deliver the commission before President Thomas Jefferson started his term. The current Secretary of State‚ James Madison‚ under Jeffersons orders‚ did not deliver the commission. Marbury applied for a writ of mandamus to force Madison to deliver said commission. HoldingMarburys application
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Marbury v. Madison United States Constitution
Case Study: Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services‚ Inc. Joshua Weisman Webster University HRMG 5700 QD F2 In the case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services‚ Inc.‚ Joseph Oncale was the victim of repeated harassment‚ sexual‚ physical and mental‚ from at least three members of the work crew‚ of which two had a supervisory position over him. When Oncale brought his complaints to the supervisors‚ they took no noticeable actions against the harassers and‚ after he had experienced
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Pleading Court
Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was a case enacted by‚ “Gonzalo Mendez‚ William Guzman‚ Frank Palomino‚ Thomas Estrada‚ and Lorenzo Ramirez” who “filed suit on behalf of their fifteen…children and five thousand other minor children of ‘Mexican and Latin descent’” (Valencia‚ 2010‚ p.23). They sued Westminster school district because they were denying their children the right to enter schools near their home. The school was in California and was predominantly White and did not allow any Mexican American
Premium Racism Race African American
“Non-Compete Agreements in Action - Microsoft v. Google” Facts: • Controversial documents • Dr. Kai-Fu Lee joined Microsoft in 1998 to run company operations in China • Knowledge of company trade secrets • Quit Microsoft because he was moving to Google • When Lee was hired Microsoft made him sign a non-compete agreement • Microsoft sued Google and Lee over the non-compete agreement Issue: Does Microsoft have the right to have a non-compete agreement with Dr. Kai-Fu Lee? Discussion: In
Premium
Holmes v. South Carolina‚ 547 U.S. 319 (2006) I. Facts: In 1995‚ a South Carolina jury convicted and sentenced to death‚ petitioner‚ Bobby Lee Holmes‚ for the “murder‚ first-degree criminal sexual assault‚ first-degree burglary‚ and robbery‚” of 86-year-old Mary Stewart. State v. Holmes‚ 320 S.C. 259‚ 262‚ 464 S.E. 2d 334‚ 336 (1995). The defendant sought to present evidence that another party committed the crimes for which he stood trial. Id. Holmes’ defense cited information from witnesses
Free Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
Marbury v. Madison is one of the most important Supreme Court cases in the history of the United States. This case set many precedents in relation to the way the Supreme Court operates and its function within the three branches of government. In essence‚ this case established the norm of judicial review‚ or the practice of the Supreme Court being the deciding voice in whether a law is constitutional‚ and it caused the relationship between the three branches of government to become a closer one.
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Marbury v. Madison
Frye v. United States In 1923 defendant James Alphonso Frye was convicted of murder in the second degree and appealed the decision. The defense counsel offered an expert witness to testify on the results of a systolic blood pressure deception test‚ which was the rudimentary precursor to the lie detector. That motion was denied. The defense counsel then offered that another test be conducted in the courtroom but were denied again. The prosecution then argued the “while the courts will go a long
Premium Expert Appeal Evidence law
The media is one of the most influential role to play on society. All types of media have several varieties and ways to influence and impact the world and its society that contributes to the media. Newspapers‚ magazines‚ television‚ music‚ art‚ electronics‚ fashion‚ religion‚ sports‚ etc.‚ are all types of media that contribute to our culture and media in society. Culture describes us in unique expressions throughout certain media. It is defined as the symbols of expression that individuals‚ groups
Premium Mass media Video game console Newspaper