convicted under the USA Patriot Act of 2003 for "furthering the aims of known terrorism organizations by advocating the violence of the United States government that is called for by those organizations." He was tried and convicted by the Federal District Court‚ and has challenged the constitutionality of this Act on the grounds that it violates his First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech as protected by the United States Constitution. The United States Patriot Act of 2003 makes it a crime to "further
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States United States Constitution
What is a sound mind? Would that I knew. In Pennsylvania‚ a person is considered to have testamentary capacity‚ that is‚ having the soundness of mind required to make a will‚ if he “appreciates‚ in a general way knows who his relations are and what property he possesses‚ and indicates an intelligent understanding of the disposition he desires to make of it.” In re Olshefski’s Estate 337 Pa. 420 (1940). An executed will is presumed to be signed by a person with capacity. The burden of proving incapacity
Premium Common law Mind Old age
Chapter II Review of Related Literature This chapter presents the reviews of literature‚ which are related and relevant to the study. To obtain information for this study‚ the researcher used books and websites on the internet and copies of different theses. Documentary films a broad category of visual expression that is based on the attempt in one fashion or another‚ to “document” reality. Although “documentary film” originally referred to movies shot on film stock‚ it has subsequently expanded
Premium Documentary film Waste Environmentalism
CONTEMPT OF COURT Introduction: In a democracy people should have right to criticize judges. The purpose of should not be to upheld the majesty and dignity of the court but only to enable it to function. Anything that curtails or impairs the freedom of limits of the judicial proceedings must of necessity result in hampering of the administration of Law and in interfering with the due course of justice. This necessarily constitutes contempt of court. Oswald defines contempt to be constituted by
Premium Judge Contempt of court Narmada Bachao Andolan
Personally‚ I agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in the landmark case of R. v. Dyment. Particularly‚ with La Forest J. commentary it provided on the importance of privacy: “…society has come to realize that privacy is at the heart of liberty in modern state…Grounded in man’s physical and moral autonomy privacy is essential for the well being of the individual. For this reason alone‚ it is worthy of constitutional protection‚ but it also has profound significance for the public order. The restraints
Premium Law Human rights United States Constitution
DOI: 9/4/2014. The patient is a 40-year old male carpenter who sustained a work-related injury to his low back and left shoulder after lifting a heavy beam at work. Patient is status post lumbar ESI at L5-S1 per procedure report dated 05/13/15. Per the PT daily treatment note dated 0/09/14‚ the IW has attended 6 sessions for the back. Per the AME done on 11/13/15 by Dr. Warbritton‚ Whole Person Impairment (WPI) rating for the back is 8%. Future medical care includes independent strengthening
Premium Patient Pain Myocardial infarction
of the current situation of the Supreme Court. The balance of the Supreme Court is currently three conservative justices and four liberal justices‚ along with one justice who often votes conservative. The next president will probably appoint at least one‚ and up to four or five new Supreme Court Justices. This will shift the balance of power in the Court for probably the next 50 or 60 years. With all of the very important decisions that the Supreme Court will have to make in the near future‚ the
Premium President of the United States United States Barack Obama
Implementation in Schools: Key Factors to Consider New technologies have changed teaching and learning in a number of ways—from graphing calculators to online lesson plans to virtual field trips and simulated dissections‚ educational technologies can help students access content in new and often exciting ways. In fact‚ one would be hard pressed to find a single school that doesn’t have access to some kind of educational technology. According to surveys‚ as many as 95% of schools are connected to
Free Teacher Education School
Key Forensic evidence presented in court The prosecution case against the main suspect‚ Michael Shirley‚ consisted of four circumstantial pieces of evidence. Forensic evidence is evidence obtained by scientific methods. In the case of Linda Cook‚ methods used included extracting impressions and DNA. An Athletic shoe impression was found on Cook’s abdomen‚ sizing at 43-45 and was the right foot. This shoe had a distinctive tread pattern including the obvious impression of the word ‘Flash’ located
Premium Forensic evidence Evidence law Jury
NSW Drug Court: Is it an effective addition to the legal system? The Drug Court of New South Wales was introduced in February 1999 as a 2-year-pilot program under the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW). After various evaluations it was decided to extend the pilot-program until 2004‚ with amendments being made to the Drug Court Act 1998 (NSW) in December 2002. The Drug Court’s main objectives are: to reduce the drug dependency of eligible persons to promote the re-integration of such drug dependent
Premium Drug addiction Crime Criminal law