Have you ever had a teacher who is always oblivious and doesn’t really pay attention to what students keep in their locker‚ even if it can cause a safety hazard? If you answered yes to this question‚ do you believe that a teacher or administrator should be allowed to search the locker of that student? Teachers and administrators should be allowed to search students’ lockers. Why they should be allowed to search the locker of a student is because of these three reasons: being able to search students’
Premium Education High school Teacher
Review: " Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under the U.S. Constitution" The article "Suspect Searches: Assessing Police Behavior Under the U.S. Constitution‚" by Gould and Mastrofski explores the police usage of unconstitutional searches. Unconstitutional searches are those that are in violation of the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment rights‚ along with certain case laws put forth the guidelines for legal stops‚ frisks‚ and searches. Gould and Mastrofski perform a direct observation
Premium Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
model focuses more upon the rights of the accused instead of the rights of victims. The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits unreasonable search and seizures stating‚ "The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons
Premium Police Law United States Constitution
United States Constitution. Evidence that was obtained from an unreasonable search and seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment or Fifth Amendment are found admissible in court under the Exclusionary Rule‚ if no exceptions apply. The establishment of the Exclusionary Rule was due to the rulings of several Supreme Court cases where it was found unconstitutional for evidence from an illegal search and seizure to be used against someone in court. The Exclusionary Rule is very important‚ as the evidence
Premium Exclusionary rule Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
she was found guilty and was put on probation. However‚ fourteen year old‚ Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment‚ “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at
Premium Education High school First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Mr Tigre‚ Unfortunately‚ a corporation can be charged and convicted of any number of crimes. If the employees or officers within a corporation violate the law on behalf of the corporation and within the scope of their employment‚ the corporate entity would be open to criminal charges. Corporations can be convicted of criminal wrongdoing in the same manner individuals are charged and convicted. In addition‚ individuals within the corporation can be charged as well. Commonly‚ when a corporation is
Premium Crime Criminology Theft
amendments of the constitution. In the Fourth Amendment‚ it is said that it is “the right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated.” Basically‚ this is saying that the person is protected against unreasonable searches and seizures. If this should occur‚ the remedy of suppression is put into act. Simply put‚ it means that evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment is not admissible in court‚ this
Premium United States Constitution Miranda v. Arizona Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Big Brother Has Gone Too Far ?If you have nothing to hide‚ you have nothing to fear‚? some people claim about the National Security Agency (NSA)(?Surveillance?). The Fourth Amendment protects United States citizens against ?unwarranted searches and seizures? (Jefferson). However‚ a short history of laws‚ including the Patriot Act‚ takes away many of these protections. The government has more freedom to spy on people than ever‚ even people that have no hard evidence linking them to crimes. The
Premium Federal Bureau of Investigation United States Constitution United States
saying that a public phone booth was not a "constitutionally protected area‚" therefore‚ they could place a wiretap on it without a warrant. IV. Issue: Does the warrantless wiretapping of a public phone booth violate the unreasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution? Answer: Yes V. Arguments for both sides: Defendant: The 4th Amendment requires that a warrant be issued stating the probable cause for a search and names of the persons or things to
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
and state officials (Andreas‚ 2009). During that time the United States and Mexican border was just a mangle chain like fence with no border patrol officers and anybody could leave and enter the U.S. as they pleased without going through any border searches (Andreas‚ 2009). After 9/11 the issue of immigration went from “Low Politics” to “High Politics” to the extent that many presidential campaigns have run promising that immigration will be one
Premium United States Terrorism Federal Bureau of Investigation