An Abridged Guide to the Harvard Referencing Style Academic Learning Centre Academic Communication 8 880000 080071 The Abridged Guide to the Harvard Referencing Style (author-date) is based on Commonwealth of Australia 2002‚ Style manual: for authors‚ editors and printers‚ 6th edn‚ John Wiley & Sons Australia‚ Milton‚ Qld. This document can be found on CQUniversity’s referencing Web site at http://www.cqu.edu.au/referencing (click on Harvard). Other information about academic
Premium Citation
1. The court case that will be written about is Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978. 2. Before this case took place‚ there had recently been many cases and laws that had been implemented regarding racial segregation and discrimination. In 1964‚ The Civil Rights Act passed which forbids racial discrimination in any program or activity receiving federal funding ((2)"Regents of the University of California v. Bakke."). The main law that was put into question and was used in the persecutor’s
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Discrimination Racism
The second of the Supreme Court Cases to be discussed is Miranda V. Arizona. The importance of this case is that Miranda was interrogated without knowledge of his 5th amendment rights. In this specific case‚ the police arrested Miranda from his home in order to take him into investigation at the Phoenix police station. While Miranda was put on trial‚ he was not informed that he had a right to an attorney. From this the officers were able to retrieve a signed written statement from Miranda. Most importantly
Premium
Title and Citation: County of Riverside v McGlaughlin‚ 500 U.S. 44 (1991) Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause. Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim‚ affirming that the County’s routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Basic: 1. Why does Harvard spend so many resources managing its endowment? Why not simply invest in Treasury Bonds and be done? 2. Why this emphasis on real returns as opposed to nominal returns? 3.How does HMC form its capital market assumptions? Why don’t they use past statistics to project the future? What do HMC’s capital market assumptions imply about the forward looking domestic equity premium? How does it compare to the historical equity premium? 4.If cash has zero standard deviation
Premium Investment Asset Bond
Strayer University Terry v Ohio LEG 420 Lisa Silva In this case John Terry was seen by an officer‚ seeming to be casing a store for a robbery. “The Petitioner‚ John W. Terry was stopped and searched by an officer after the officer observed the Petitioner seemingly casing a store for a potential robbery. The officer approached the Petitioner for questioning and decided to search him first.” The officer finally decided to approach the men for questioning‚ after observing them for quite a long
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police Supreme Court of the United States
CITATION: Heath v. Alabama‚ 472 U.S. 82 (1985). PARTIES: Petitioner = Larry Gene Heath Respondent = Alabama FAC TS: The petitioner‚ a resident of Russel County‚ Alabama hired Charles Owens and Gregory Lumpkin to kill his wife‚ Rebecca McGuire Heath‚ for $2‚000. Mr. Heath left his residence in Alabama to meet Mr. Owens and Mr. Lumpkin in Georgia‚ just across the Alabama state line. Mr. Heath led the two men back to his residence in Alabama‚ gave them the keys to his car and
Premium Law United States Appeal
Section 1 Essay U.S. v. Windsor‚ 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013)‚ is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario‚ Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple‚ Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married‚ Spyer died‚ and left all of her estate to her wife‚ Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses‚ she was denied because of the federal Defense
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Same-sex marriage United States Constitution
v. Wade; then defend or criticize it. There are many different choices of lifestyle and decisions that people make that everyone does not agree with. There are always controversies when it comes to the LGBT community‚ gun laws‚ and abortion. In the case Roe v. Wade‚ they were questioning whether the constitution contained parts that granted women the rights to get an abortion that also nullified the Texas prohibition. Some people may feel that abortions should be legal for all women to have‚ but I
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade Pregnancy
References and Bibliographies Effective Learning Service References and Bibliographies A M E M B E R O F University of Bradford‚ School of Management References and Bibliographies PREFACE Academic writing is special in an age of rapid communication. Most assignments in higher education require you to slow the tempo and carefully explore and test out ideas‚ either for their own sake or in relation to real or hypothetical situations. This requires you to‚ not just present and
Premium Citation Reference