Looking at this question from the nature perspective‚ one would argue that an organism’s genes influence these processes. Natural human behavior is seen as the result of already-present biological factors‚ such as genetic code. On the other hand‚ someone looking at it from a nurture perspective would argue that these processes are acquired through interaction with the environment. Nurtured human behavior is seen as the result of environmental interaction‚ which can provoke changes in brain structure
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology
There has been numerous discussions on the nature vs. nurture topic. One side says that nature‚ or genes‚ are responsible for developing children the way that they are‚ while another side says that nurture‚ the environment‚ is responsible. Regardless‚ nurture is the main cause for “monsters” and their behavior because our peers and family help shape our personality‚ interests‚ behavior‚ and how we act. One of the most important reasons why nurture is responsible for making “monsters” is that humans
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology
There is a big controversy between whether inherited genes or the environment influences and effects our personality‚ development‚ behavior‚ intelligence and ability. This controversy is most often recognized as the nature verses nurture conflict. Some people believe that it is strictly genes that effect our ways of life‚ others believe that it is the environment that effects us‚ and some believe that both of these influence us. Either way‚ social scientists have been struggling for centuries deciding
Premium Genetics Nature versus nurture Psychology
the ability to react to situations from a hereditary standpoint or the acquired standpoint. This statement is the idea of the nature versus nurture debate and how it affects our lives. In Frankenstein‚ Mary Shelley shows examples of the nature versus nurture debate by showing how the creature wants acceptance and to show that he wasn’t born evil. With nature versus nurture being a widely discussed debate it is easy to tie into different situations. "The debate within psychology is concerned with
Premium Nature versus nurture Human nature
has good genes. Genes can be a huge impact on why she has an outstanding athletic ability‚ although it is not the only influence (CITE). Genetics affect our strength‚ muscles‚ anaerobic threshold‚ lung capacity‚ and flexibility‚ in which all play role in our athletic ability. (CITE) For example‚ Usain Bolt‚ the worlds fastest sprinter. If you trained exactly like Usain Bolt‚ it still doesn’t mean you will be able to run as fast as him‚ as it is also in his genes. Although‚ if you had the same genes
Premium English-language films Sport Psychology
The concept ‘nature vs. nurture’ refers to the debate surrounding the influence of genetic factors and the environment in determining personality. It still remains contentious as to whether our personality is primarily determined by inherent genetics (biological approach) or by environmental conditioning (behaviourist approach). Shelley effectively embodies this life-long debate through the characterisation of Victor Frankenstein and the Frankenstein creature. She highlights the significance of
Premium Nature versus nurture Human nature Psychology
Michelle Esteban December 22‚ 2011 Arlene Rider Introduction to Psychology Nature vs. Nurture Controversy The Nature vs. Nurture controversy was begun by British researcher Sir Francis Galton‚ who invented the term “Nature vs. Nurture” (Wood‚ Wood‚ & Boyd‚ 2005). He began the debate about whether intelligence happens because of our environment‚ or because of the genes we are given at birth (Wood‚ et al.‚ 2005). There is much debate in the scientific community about which is more
Premium Nature versus nurture Human nature Human behavior
In contrast to nature‚ the nurture aspect was originated from John Locke‚ who believed we are born with a tabula rasa (blank slate)‚ and our experiences are written upon it. John Watson a behaviourist believed that we are shaped from our experiences‚ and from this he claimed that he could take a child from any background and shape them into whatever he wanted purely from social experience (Passer & Smith 2008. p 9.). These ideas appear to be too simplistic as there is more to humans than our environment
Premium Tabula rasa Human nature Empiricism
science is the question of nature versus nurture. Dating back to Locke’s idea of Tabula Rasa‚ scientists have argued over the source of personality. The nature approach believes that personality is a result of our DNA; the nurture approach believes that our personality is shaped by our experiences. Those who support nature point to heritable mental illnesses‚ evolved behaviors‚ and common behaviors across generations as evidence for their side. The supporters of nurture‚ on the other hand‚ point to
Premium Homosexuality Nature versus nurture Sexual orientation
For the history fair‚ we decided to debate nature versus nurture and the two people we used in our debate was Greek philosopher‚ Aristotle on the side of nature and for the side of nurture is also a Greek philosopher Plato. First to start the project‚ my partner named Brittany and I jarred when and purchased a tri – board to present the project. Second‚ to do this debate‚ my partner and I researched on the history of the two philosophers and we also did some research on both of the two great thinker’s
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology