Sentencing is very important and usually the last stage of the criminal process. The purpose of sentencing is to punish the criminals while at the same time stopping crime from continuing. The five philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution‚ deterrence‚ incapacitation‚ rehabilitation and restoration. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. Deterrence is the strategy
Free Criminology Crime Criminal law
Jacob Gray – Rene Descartes’ “Meditations on First Philosophy” Paper Rene Descartes started his first meditation with a simple question: “What can be called into doubt?” Descartes explains that many of his preconceived notions had been proven false and it made him question many things that he had found to be true in life. Instead of dismantling every belief or fact he thought he knew to be true‚ he started by undermining his own beliefs by questioning their foundations. The question remains‚ however
Premium Genetics DNA Mind
The Role of Philosophy of Mind in Cognitive Science For centuries‚ science had made great effort in our understanding on the external observable world. But during much of this time‚ there were still many unanswered questions about something seemingly so important to us. That something is the human mind. What is mind? The journey in searching the answer to this question dated back to as early as 400 B.C. with Plato‚ one of the greatest Greek philosopher. There are a lot of ways to tackle this question;
Premium Philosophy of mind Cognitive science Mind
Criminal Sentencing Decisions within the American Judicial System Abstract A major issue in criminal justice is sentencing. America’s court system has struggled to balance competing goals and policies in regards to criminal sentencing. This paper explores the ideas behind changes made to the sentencing policies with the United States judicial system. It begins with an overview of the goals behind criminal sentencing. This paper concludes with a discussion on the current status and disparities
Premium Crime Criminal law
achieved without any experience or knowledge from the outside world. The ideas are said to be innate or we already have a notion of knowledge when we are born. This is the method René Descartes uses in his arguments in his work Meditations on First Philosophy. Descartes uses a priori to its strengths and weaknesses. In my opinion a priori reasoning has its weaknesses in its strengths and therefore cannot convince the modern day reader of a plausible approach to proving Gods existence. The other method
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Immanuel Kant
------------------------------------------------- MY PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY ------------------------------------------------- IN GOD‚ MAN AND THE WORLD ------------------------------------------------- A Project Submitted To The Faculty of Philosophy Department In the College of Arts and Sciences of LPU ------------------------------------------------- Prof. Ms. Violeta G. Tabin ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- In
Premium Philosophy Religion Faith
My theory for the reasoning of punishment has two main goals which are to provide justice for the victims and a lesson to the convicted. When a judge sits in preparation to initiate sentencing they have to go through numerous thought processes because of the uniqueness of every case. Considerations such as what are they trying to accomplish with the punishment and who would benefit from such a sentence. General factors like the age of the convicted and the heinousness of the crime committed matters
Free Crime Criminal law Punishment
Epistemology: Meditations on First Philosophy — Skepticism Rene Descartes’ take on epistemology concerns examining his core beliefs and applying the method of skepticism. He examines these beliefs by raising doubts on each of his core principles. He hopes to build a foundation which not even the strongest skeptic can raise a doubt on. Rene also proclaims that should he find anything from his core beliefs to doubt—even the slightest of doubts— he must reject the foundational belief simply because
Premium Epistemology Mind Truth
The Philosophies of Georg Hegel and Herbert Spencer The Philosophy of Georg Wilhelm Hegel (1770-1801) Metaphysics Georg Wilhelm Hegel aspired to find a philosophy that would embody all human experiences with the integration of not only science‚ but also religion‚ history‚ art‚ politics and beyond. Hegel’s metaphysical theory of absolute idealism claimed that reality was the absolute truth of all logic‚ spirit‚ and rational ideas encompassing all human experience and knowledge. He believed that
Premium Philosophy Marxism Political philosophy
The Modern Era The Modern Era of political philosophy is best characterized as a revolt against the traditional constraints of the time. Machiavelli believed that politics should be separate and distinct from ethics‚ morality‚ and religion. Protestant reformers such as Luther and Calvin went head to head with the Catholic Church‚ paving the way for religious individualism and incorporating various political revisions. Hobbes called for a major overhaul in England concerning not only political and
Premium Political philosophy Protestant Reformation Philosophy