"Shareholder" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 25 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    /18258.html One of the key discoveries of Veritas is that between the time RCom was demerged from RIL on 31 August 2005 and listed on 6 March 2006‚ "the ownership of promoters ballooned from 38.27% to 63% in RCom‚ under the guise of improving shareholder value and transparency. …. …the much discussed Ambani split is a charade to deflect attention from a well thought-out plan to split family

    Premium Expense Shareholder Change

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shareholder Risk

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the most widely used concepts in finance is that shareholders require a risk premium over bond yields to bear the additional risks of equity investments. While models such as the two-parameter capital asset pricing model (CAPM) or arbitrage pricing theory offer explicit methods for varying risk premia across securities‚ the models are invariably linked to some underlying market (or factor-specific) risk premium. Unfortunately‚ the theortical models provide limited practical advice on establishing

    Premium Investment Interest Financial markets

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    managers. Two models that discuss Corporate Social Responsibility are the Shareholder Model and stakeholder Models. The goal of this paper is to discuss these models‚ the general principals of corporate social responsibility‚ and end with some concluding thoughts. It is an ageless discussion on what the corporate social responsibility is for managers. Two models that discuss Corporate Social Responsibility are the Shareholder Model and stakeholder Models. The goal of this paper is to discuss these

    Premium Stakeholder Social responsibility Stakeholder theory

    • 3278 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive Pay

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Executive Pay: Who should decide? In a recent editorial in the Seattle Times‚ the editors complained that the executives of a public company‚ Simon Property Group‚ should have their salaries determined by the shareholders. Among the many things wrong with this piece is first‚ how do shareholders know anything about the performance of the executives in question? They don’t. They don’t work beside them on any kind of basis. They do not know what kind of challenges the company faced and whether the executive

    Premium Stock Stock market Corporate governance

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Director Duties

    • 1852 Words
    • 5 Pages

    INTRODUCTION Shareholders and members of the company always own the number of remedies to against the wrong in process of managing company. It can be seen that in the different situations will be applied different remedies for each members and officers of the company. On the facts available‚ there are two issues to be discussed. The first issue is what have Don breached his directors’ duties under the act in good faith and best interest of the company as well as disclosure personal interest. The

    Premium Board of directors Fiduciary Stock

    • 1852 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    SHARE CAPITAL INCREASE OF UNLISTED LIMITED COMPANIES Limited companies nowadays have undoubtedly established their importance in the development and evolution of the global economy. Their particular legal and actual form‚ in conjunction with the financial figures they usually represent have turned these specific entities into a springboard of capital growth and expansion. Because of the great importance held by limited companies in the functioning of the national‚ but also the global

    Premium Bond Stock Corporation

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Veil Of Incorporation

    • 5842 Words
    • 22 Pages

    CORPORATE VEIL INTRODUCTION • The principle of separate corporate personality as confirmed in Saloman v. A Saloman & Co. Ltd. [1897] forms the corner-stone of co. law. • The recognition that a co. is a separate legal entity distinct from its shareholders is often expressed as the veil of incorporation. • Incorporation of a co. casts a veil over the true controllers of the co‚ a veil through which the law will not usually penetrate. • Once a co. is incorporated the courts usually do not look behind

    Premium Corporation Subsidiary Supreme Court of the United States

    • 5842 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PRIZM/Guidant Case Study

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In 2005‚ a young man named Joshua Oukrop died as a result of a malfunction in his Prizm 2 DR heart defibrillator. The Prizm 2 DR was manufactured by the Guidant Corporation. The Guidant Corporation had been manufacturing the Prizm 2 DR for several years and in 2002 had taken several steps within the manufacturing process to fix the problem with the devices. Following Joshua Oukrop’s death‚ Guidant officials met with his doctors and explained that they had known about the malfunction and not recalled

    Premium Fiduciary Economics Human rights

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Winding Up

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Winding Up of Company The winding up is the process of putting an end to the life of the company. And during this process‚ the assets of the company are disposed of‚ the debts of the company are paid off out of the realized assets and if any surplus is left‚ it is distributed among the members in proportion to their shareholding in the company Q.1 WHAT ARE THE POWERS OF LIQUIDATOR LIQUIDATOR A person appointed to carry out the winding up of a company is called liquidator. If the winding

    Premium Public company Privately held company Corporation

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vodafone case questions

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    AirTouch proposed that each Mannesmann share would receive 53.7 Vodafone AirTouch shares‚ so that in aggregate Mannesmann shareholders would own 47.2% of the equity if the combined firm. a) Describe the stock swap. As of December 17‚ what was the market value of Mannesmann’s contribution to the combined firm? As a Mannesmann shareholder‚ would you accept the current offer? As a shareholders ‚ would you support the proposed transaction? b) On December 17‚ 1999 based n real stock prices of the two firms

    Premium Stock market Stock Mergers and acquisitions

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 50