The average person would believe there would be a Constitutional or statutory qualification to serve as a judge. This is not the case in the United States (Judicial Process in America 8th edition pg. 125 chapter 6). The states of Pennsylvania and Arizona have their own agenda when it comes to the judicial selection process. In the state of Pennsylvania justices must meet the basic qualifications to serve on the bench that the state has in place (www.pacourts.us). These qualifications include‚ being
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States United States
Anh Phan Professor Frank English 112 September 28‚ 2012 “That Is What It Means to Say Phoenix‚ Arizona” In short story Sherman Alexie. “That is what it means to say Phoenix‚ Arizona‚ he creates three main characters‚ Victor‚ Victor’s father‚ and Thomas who have three different personalities. However‚ Thomas seems one of the most interesting characters in this short story. The author presents Thomas as a person who has not been affected negative by the hardship and struggles of modern day Native
Premium Sherman Alexie Arizona Personality psychology
Ohio (1961) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The ruling of Mapp v. Ohio determined that all evidence that is obtained by search and seizures that violate the Fourth Amendment is admissible in a criminal trial in a state court overruling Wolf v. Colorado‚ which holds the contrary. The Exclusionary Rule applied not only to the Fourth Amendments protections against search and seizures‚ but also to the Fifth Amendments protection against self-incrimination. Miranda v. Arizona brought the Fifth Amendment
Premium Exclusionary rule Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Journeys end- how sheriff conveys the horrors of war Sherriff makes it clear‚ throughout the play‚ that the horrors of war had a huge effect on the soldiers both mentally and physically. In this play you are going to find out how men who fought in world war one‚ coped with the stress and the strains‚ and you are also bound to discover the futility of the war as men died for no reason or for an effective cause. Sherriff makes it clear and explores one matter with particular depth that describes
Premium Howitzer World War I Artillery
Arizona Immigration law The new Arizona law requires immigrants to carry their alien registration documents at all times and requires police to question people if there is reason to suspect they are in the United States illegally. My opinion on the Arizona immigration law is that it’s not a very good idea‚ because I believe it will bring about a lot of issues in the world. It could also be a good thing too. When things like this come about I think people should look at it through all points of view
Premium Immigration to the United States United States Immigration
How does Sheriff present disturbed characters in ‘Journey’s End’. (NOT Stanhope) Journey’s End is a play written by R.C. Sherriff based on his experience of WW1. He presents several of the characters in the play as being disturbed in different ways from his experience of people’s behaviour in the trenches. The most disturbed character in the play is easily Stanhope due to his ambitious drinking and his temper. However‚ there are still other characters that are disturbed during the play. Out
Premium The Play
Arizona v. Gant (2009) SCOTUS rule held that the Belton rule was revised as the justices stated that it did not give authority for the police officers to search an arrestee’s vehicle if the occupant had been arrested and therefore could not access the interior of the car. This implies that the police should only search the arrestee and places that could be reached. Gant could no longer reach the interior of his car‚ and there was no reasonable ground to suppose that a search would produce evidence
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Arizona v Johnson (2009) 129 S.Ct. 781 Date of Judgment: January 26‚ 2009 INTRODUCTION In 2002‚ Lemon Montrea Johnson was the passenger in the backseat of a car stopped for a traffic violation. Johnson was charged with; inter alia‚ possession of drugs and possession of a weapon by a felon. These items were discovered during a protective pat-down search of Johnson. Johnson was convicted by the trial court. Johnson argued that his conviction should be overturned because the trial court was
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Court
Tison v. Arizona – Defense In this case‚ the felony-murder law is unconstitutional and Tisons cannot be executed because if they did not plan to or actually kill anyone‚ under the 8th Amendment‚ their punishment given is cruel and unusual. In Enmund v. Florida‚ Earl Enmund was given the death sentence for being an accessory to two murders. He later appealed and the Supreme Court ruled it was unlawful and his death sentence was vacated. The defendant’s punishment must be proportionate to the
Premium Law Crime Murder
1. The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling of Miranda v. Arizona set a precedence on how future suspects would be interrogated. It makes complete sense to advise a person that is being interrogated that he or she has a right to remain silent during interrogation and that he or she has the right to have counsel present during an interrogation. It’s also important that the suspect be fully aware and full understand his or her rights before the interrogation begins. -WRITTEN AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION-METHODS
Premium Police Crime Law