Part A Question 1 Step 1 Identify the legal issue The legal issue is whether the element of agreement requires the formation of a valid contract. Step 2 Explain the principles of law relevant to that issue with reference to authority (cases and/or legislation) The element of an agreement is one of the three elements of a contract intention to be legally bound either in formal execution in a deed; or consideration. Agreements means a meeting of the minds on at least those essential
Premium Contract
QUESTION 3 Based on the case given Richard entered only into a donation agreement in terms of which he will provide a free daily lunch to members of the political party‚ after freightened by Jonathan’s threat. Therefore this contract is not with Richard’s consent. According to the case of situation‚ there was Coercion and Undue Influence by the political party and Jonathan. “Coercion” is the committing‚ or threatening to commit any act forbidden by the Panel Code‚ or the unlawful detaining or
Premium Contract Contract law
DIRECTORS COLLEGE OF BUSINESS School of Accountancy BACHELOR OF BUSINESS STUDIES BACHELOR OF BUSINESS INFORMATION BACHELOR OF ACCOUNTANCY 155.203 Law of Business Organisations Semester 2 2008 Wellington Week 7 Lecture 2 21 DIRECTORS (1) 21.1 Who is a director? Section 126. gives an extended meaning to the term director in order that the persons who actually run the company are liable as such in law. 126 Meaning of “director” (1) In this Act‚ director‚ in relation to a company‚ includes—
Premium Physical exercise Acts of the Apostles Supreme Court of the United States
Part A Question 1: Step 1 The issue of law it that for a reasonable contract to be established‚ whether the element of agreement required for the formation of a contract can be formed in parties. Step 2 A legally enforceable contract can be organized by three significant parts; there are intention‚ agreement and consideration. With regards to agreement‚ it means a discussion of the consensus on critical terms needed for a workable transaction. Generally‚ while the parties intended‚ an agreement
Premium Contract
question is whether Micky has a contract with Ureach Mobile Co. Section 11 of Contracts Act 1950 provides who are competent to contract‚ that is those who are of the age of majority according to the law to which she is subject‚ have sound mind‚ and not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject (KrishnanL‚ RajooL‚ & VergisA.C‚2009). On the other hand‚ the Age of Majority Act 1971 states that the age of majority is 18 years and above‚ and anyone below that age would be regarded
Premium Contract
conditional constitute consideration? Yes‚ such a promise consideration even if the condition is unlikely to occur. 3. What is the general rule about the adequacy of consideration? The adequacy of the consideration is irrelevant because the law does not prohibit bargains. 5. Is there consideration when a secured note for a lesser amount is given and accepted in discharge of an unsecured note for a greater amount? Explain. No‚ because if a secured not for a lesser amount is given and
Premium Contract Contract law Law
PBUS01—Summer 2013 Final Project Name: Alice 1. Case Name‚ Citation‚ and Court PETROLEUM REFRACTIONATING CORPORATION v.KENDRICK OIL CO. 65 F.2d 997 (1933) No. 774. Circuit Court of Appeals‚ Tenth Circuit. 2. Key Facts A. The Kendrick Company ordered a special grade of oil 1‚500‚000 gallons‚ 10% more or less from the Petroleum Corporation on January 15‚ 1932. B. Under the terms of the contract‚ the Petroleum Corporation agreed either to sell and deliver the oil or to discontinue making
Premium Contract Law Consideration
Executive Summary Various issues in the common law arise when agents make contracts on behalf of principals. Should a principal be bound when his agent makes a contract on his behalf that he would immediately wish to disavow? The tradeoffs resemble those in tort‚ so the least-cost avoider principle is useful for deciding which agreements are binding and can unify a number of different doctrines in agency law. In particular‚ an efficiency explanation can be found for the undisclosed-principal rule
Premium Contract
genuine requirement for a job‚ such as‚ for example‚ the need to wear a hard hat when working on a construction site. Bona fide occupational requirement is a defence that excuses discrimination o a prohibited ground when it is done for a legitimate business reason. Bona Fide occupational requirement can be rejected if a male does not have the care‚ attractiveness and delegacy a women would have. Physical capabilities have also been rejected example a women not getting hired because she cannot lift
Premium Contract Tort
Jonah Watson Business Law Case Analysis #3 IN YOUR COURT A remedy is the relief provided for an innocent party when the other party has breached the contract. There are two types of remedies; remedies in equity and remedies at law. Remedies in equity are only awarded only if the remedy at law is inadequate. Remedies at law normally award monetary damages Ken‚ the owner of a famous candy store‚ and Sweet‚ Inc. have entered into a contract‚ essentially designating Sweet‚ Inc. as his
Premium Damages Tort Contract