Should parents be held responsible for their children’s actions? Do you have siblings at home? Have you ever gotten in trouble for something you’ve never done? It’s not a good feeling. If you don’t want to be blamed nor punished for something you didn’t commit why should parents? As violence by juveniles has increased in recent years‚ the debate about parents’ legal responsibility for children’s behavior has escalated. Shootings‚ gang violence‚ drugs‚ alcohol these are very few things that children
Premium Parent Mother Childhood
morning/ evening/ afternoon to all of you. The topic of our debate is : should parents be held responsible for their children misbehaviour? I’ll first start by defining juvenile crime‚ it the habitual committing of criminal acts or offences by a young person‚ especially one below the age at which ordinary criminal prosecution is possible. I am now going to discuss the points why parents should be held responsible for their children misbehaviour. First‚ the children’s behaviour is the direct result of
Free Crime Childhood Juvenile delinquency
2009 Should bartender be held responsible for the behavior of their patrons? According to Beth Benson of the Associated Content the duties of a bartender are to take the orders of their patrons‚ serve drinks‚ keep the shelves stocked‚ and to keep the bar clean. But after the patrons are served and have left the bar‚ is the bartenders’ job really done? According to the law in many states bartenders are responsible for the behavior of their patrons even after when they leave bar. Should a bartender
Premium Ethanol Alcoholic beverage Alcohol intoxication
Should Parents Be Held Responsible for Their Children’s Needs and Actions? There are many pros and cons over the argument on whether parents should be held responsible for their children’s actions or not. Some people claim that yes parents should because they are the authority figure in that child’s life‚ while others say no‚ believing that if the child can choose to do something wrong then they must be held accountable‚” if parents are found liable for their children’s actions when they are young
Premium Youth detention center The Child Ethics
what age should children be held criminally responsible’‚ and ‘what are children’s influences growing up’. The minimum age that children are held criminally responsible is 10 years old in England‚ Wales and Ireland and only 8years old in Scotland. There have been many issues regarding this age limit and as it points out in Madge’s ‘Children In These Days’ (2006)‚ it is interesting that children and adults tended to agree on the ages at which children should be held criminally responsible: both children
Premium Crime Peer group
Yes people should be hold responsible for a life or death situation. Say if someone killed another human being or a living organism you would be hold accountable for their action. But it depends on what they did. They should be responsible for a life or death situation but it depends on what they did or did not do.“I am getting out there! I yelled to k... I was sure l had yelled loud enough but my voice did not seem to have reached (Murakami 139)”. In this case he is not responsible for his friend
Premium English-language films Morality Thought
sometimes it could go horribly wrong. And for that reason‚ people should be held accountable for their actions because it is obviously their fault for getting seriously hurt or injured during these sports. To begin with‚ People should be held accountable for extreme sports accidents. On page 126 from “Cost of Survival” states that “A lost climber or an injured base jumper may need help.” The base jumpers and climbers should be held accountable for their actions because that is their fault for taking
Premium
Many crimes and social problems are caused by children. Despite the damage these teenage criminals cause‚ parents are not held responsible in most countries. This essay will discuss whether parents should be forced to pay for their children’s crimes. There are many reasons why parents should not be responsible for crimes committed by teenage children. First of all‚ teenagers today are independent. They often move out of the parent’s house at 18 years of age or younger. They
Premium Adolescence Juvenile delinquency Childhood
Eating Disorders: Who is to be held responsible? Abstract Only a thin line separates “normal” dieting from an eating disorder. (Hesse-Biber‚ 1996) Unfortunately for young women in this day and age‚ social and economic factors pressure them to pursue the thinness ideal‚ even to the point of dangerous behavior. At one point in time‚ dieting would have been considered one of the ways to improve one’s health. Today’s society has been brainwashed to believe that in order to be healthy‚ one has to
Premium Anorexia nervosa Bulimia nervosa Eating disorders
There is a issues in the current case which need to be solved. The issue is if Li can be held liable for the injuries suffered by Paul Henri. Paul Henri is diagnosed with a concussion by playing barrel rolling operating by Li when he was looking to get some more excitement in his life. Therefore‚ the question arises if it can be established that Li is liable under the law of negligence for the injuries suffered by Paul Henri. For this purpose‚ it need to be seen if Li had taken all reasonable steps
Premium Traumatic brain injury Concussion Brain