" Should the government be able to monitor the internet? I feel very strong about this topic. The local‚ federal‚ and state government shouldn’t be allowed to keep tabs on everyone using the internet. Bullying is a good reason that monitoring should be allowed‚ but my overall opinion is still strong in no. The government shouldn’t be able to invade our privacy if we haven’t done anything to make them suspect anything. In certain cases‚ I am ok with monitoring. If you are using a school computer
Premium Surveillance Law Government
world? What if the government made these inventions a reality? I think the government should fund technology that will help the military and change the world. The first question is‚ what would the government fund? The government could fund technology.“We need to start looking at how to get quantities and lower risks.” Frank Kendall. some things for technology could be satellites. They could help the military find possible enemy locations and their own. Another thing the government could make more technology
Premium Technology Military United States
Swedish government should ban smoking! Today we know more about cigarettes and use of these than in the past. We know that smoking seriously harms you and others around you‚ as said on cigarette packets. But why continue the production of cigarettes and why do not the government forbid smoking if that habit is such a dangerous risk for the health? In the late fourteen century‚ Europeans sailed over from Spain and Portugal and started the building of their colonies in South America. The people from
Free Tobacco Nicotine Cigarette
The current system that law enforcement employs is a system that is being abused since it’s used to spy on the privacy of those who feel like they should be protected by the government. In the novel‚ 1984 by George Orwell‚ the party uses its power to spy on the civilians‚ exploiting the citizens’ feelings regarding the safety of the system that is currently in place since they misguidedly feel protected. The people feel like they are being shielded from violence such as war and other sorts of problems
Premium Government State Surveillance
expression. Therefore‚ it is easily understandable when some people believe that the government has a duty to provide art to its citizens. However‚ many other people feel that the government money spent on art is wasted‚ particularly when there are so many others demands on it. This essay will look at the arguments and examine whether governments should spend money on art. There are several reasons why governments should spend money on art. First of all‚ art is a very important part a nation’s culture
Premium Art Government Aesthetics
the federal government. As a nation‚ we are now losing jobs because of Obamacare without even realizing it. Now to the second part of my argument. The United States IS NOT responsible to give health care to their citizens. Many people believe that it is the government’s duty/right/responsibility to take care of the governed. This is not true‚ it is the government’s duty/right/responsibility to SECURE THE BASIC RIGHTS: LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. That is ALL the government is to do. Many
Premium Health care United States Health
Luis Salas Professor Williams English 1C 23 November 2013 The United States Government: Illegal Spying Surveillance in America is nothing new. It dates back to around 1945 with the ending of World War II after the Soviet Union and the United States became rivals as the world powers. From bugs on tree trunks to cameras in shoes to airplane drones‚ surveillance tools have really evolved over the years. The United States has been spending huge amounts of money to create better spying technology
Premium United States Federal Bureau of Investigation Government
extent the government is monitoring us at this current time is a violation of our fundamental rights as human beings. That this surveillance of our activity is infringing upon our privacy‚ so in turn the founding laws that our Nation was built upon‚ which includes the right to privacy in our Bill of Rights‚ are prohibiting the government from observing our actions on the internet. Although there is an equitable point at the foundation of this argument‚ the extent at which our government monitors us
Premium Human rights Law Freedom of speech
Religion Should Be Part of Government Decisions. Religion has been a topic of discussion for a while. On whether it should be in schools‚ or on public property‚ or‚ for our cause‚ whether it should be part of the government. To be more clear‚ we’re for the use of religious views (to an extent) in governmental decision and/or regulation. Now‚ one might think that introducing religion in politics is a bad idea‚ but without really researching on the subject‚ one could easily think anything. Just
Premium Meaning of life Life Federal government of the United States
argued that communism was dead. However‚ in order to understand the challenges in our global economic system‚ we should know that there are two important reasons as to why we should not rule out Marx and his dialectical reasons. First‚ we need to recognize the fact that it was the Soviet Union‚ not Marx‚ which bore the responsibility for how communism played out in the real world. We should not confuse Marx’s analysis of capitalism with the Marxian beliefs within a socialist society. Even though Marx
Premium Communism Cold War Soviet Union