Similarities and Differences Bacteria and archaea both share the fact that they are single-celled prokaryotic microorganisms that lack membrane enclosed nuclei. It has been discovered that the two typically can be found to have the same size and shape as one another. “They are both found occurring as rods‚ cocci‚ spirals‚ plates‚ coiled etc.” ("Archaea vs. Bacteria‚" n.d.). Both organisms use the flagella to swim and also reproduce by means of binary fission. On the surface these similarities can
Premium Bacteria Archaea
causes of how a human being acts‚ and functions. From the heredity standpoint‚ however‚ it is proven that heredity does play a part in a person’s development and behavior. In a twin study‚ they proved that identical (monozygotic) children have more similarities living together and being separated and living with two different families than the fraternal (dizygotic) twins that are raised together in the same home. Having the same genes that your parents have‚ such as: eye color‚ skin color‚ and hair color
Premium Nature versus nurture Human behavior
disorganized. But throughout my life‚ I developed some ways to cope with it‚ especially after having some negative experiences. So what was the main factor that made me disorganized person? I strongly believe that it was a combination of both nature and nurture‚ but if I had to choose one‚ I would have to say that the genes that came from my father have a big impact on this trait. My father is also a disorganized person. I am very much alike to him in this regard. On the other hand‚ my mother is extremely
Free Psychology Personality psychology Human behavior
Are we humans the product of nature or nurture? Nature is how much of your personality is genetic‚ what you were born with. Nurture is how much of your personality was caused because of your environment‚ how you were raised. So does nature or nurture contribute more to someone’s personality and behaviour? Or do they both play a role in shaping our lives? I hope to come to a conclusion with this debate in the end of my thesis. With nurturing‚ people tend to observe others actions and behaviour
Free Human behavior Behavior Psychology
child psychology is the nature vs nurture discussion. Each of these sides express great points that are really hard to decide whether a child’s development is predisposed in his/her DNA‚ or a majority of it is influenced by his/her life experiences and environment. In nature it’s the natural biological givens. This is the hereditary information we receive from our parents at conception and cannot be altered. In nurture‚ it’s the main contribution to how a person develops. Nurture is made by the influence
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology
scholars debate from the nature-inspired and nurture-inspired perspectives. Both nature and environmental factors interact to help children develop language. It is reasonable that every child has a genetic basis to develop language abilities. However‚ the environmental stimulation‚ or nurture-inspired perspective will play a more important role than the nature approach does‚ given a special case of Genie and the experience factor in language acquisition. The best example of why nature alone cannot develop
Premium Linguistics Nature versus nurture Developmental psychology
What side are you on? Nature vs nurture has been an debat for along time. People have been wanting to know which one has a stronger role in a child’s growing stages. How you act and who you are has a role in genetics. The way a child’s brain is developed and who you grow up to be has the effect from nature. Nature and Nurture both have the effect on a child’s personality ‚ but I choose nurtures side. Nature is genetics ‚ and it makes you who you are‚ and how you act. Look at the Jim twins.
Premium Nature versus nurture Human nature Psychology
The nature versus nurture is a debate within psychology that looks into whether we acquire certain characteristics and behaviours through our genes or whether we learn them from our environment. [1] Nature is what we are supposed to of have inherited via genetics therefore is biologically apart of who we are whereas nurture is the idea that we learn our behaviours and develop certain characteristics from our environment. Does god exist? This has probably been the most disputed question for over
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology
What is meant by the term Nature/ Nurture? These two terms are used to the individual behaviour in a physiological perspective. Nature is described to be the inherited characteristics individual obtains from their parents e.g. this could be hair colour. On the other hand Nurture is defined to be the influences of society are what shape the individuals characteristics. There are different opinions and views that people have on the nature verses nurture for example we inherit genes from both
Premium Human nature Nature versus nurture Psychology
" (pg. 355) According to Saul McLeod‚ nature vs. nurture is a distinct viewpoint of behavior that is a result of either inherited (genetic) or obtained (learned) characteristics of aggression. We think of life as a natural ability that influences genetic inheritance and other biological factors. Nurture impacts external factors after conceptions‚ the product of exposure‚ experience and learning in an individual. Is aggression human nature or social nurture interacting? According to many social
Premium Aggression Violence Nature versus nurture