Case Study for Simmons Laboratories This case is about three indivuals with different leadship styles. Brandon Newbridge is a synthesizer‚ which means‚ he is a eclectic‚ thinker‚ pragmatist‚ and “whatever works” kind of leader. Dr. William Goh’s is like a partner‚ which means he is mentor who passes his wisdom down to other. He is conscientious ‚ collaborative‚ ego-free‚ and is able to work side by side with his peers. Lester Zapf is an achiever‚ which means “ebullient leader” who is
Premium Problem solving Communication Interpersonal communication
Overview and Executive Summary In this case analysis we will discuss Organizational Behavior‚ Decision making‚ Organization’s culture‚ Diversity‚ Values and leadership behavior. Today relatively small differences in performance between companies‚ such as in the speed at which they can bring new products or services to market or in how they motivate their employee to find ways to reduce costs or improve performance‚ can combine to give one company a significant competitive advantage over another.
Premium Mattress Management Organizational studies
Simmons Case Study Susan K. Ficken Grand Canyon University: LDR - 615 08/26/2014 Simmons Case Study This paper looks at the Great Game of Life (GGOL) program and the overall impact it had on Simmons. The Great Game of Life (GGOL) was developed by the founder of Pecos River Learning Centers‚ change management expert‚ Larry Wilson. He believed that organizations “that nurtured their people‚ creating a context in which people can develop and grow‚ will‚ over time‚ enjoy the benefits of a committed
Premium Management United States Design
Running head: SIMMONS CASE STUDY Simmons Case Study Britt W. Gerdes Grand Canyon University Org. Devlp. and Chg. LDR 615 Prof. Walsh May 17‚ 2011 Simmons Case Study In this case study‚ it explored some of the major hurdles of handling a significant executive change at Simmons‚ which was a well established and traditional company that mass-produced and disseminated mattresses. Charlie Eitel‚ the newly employed CEO of Simmons was hired to make some major changes with the organizations performance
Premium Management Marketing Strategic management
Simmons Case Analysis Simmons should roll out the GGOL program in order to repair incongruence between the firm’s current culture and its strategy‚ as well as a misalignment between its present culture and CEO Charlie Eitel’s desired culture. The $7.2 million price tag is a substantial investment in light of the company’s +5 times EBITDA leverage ratio and will face resistance from Fenway Partners‚ the private equity shop that bought Simmons in 1998. We have identified Eitel’s sources of power
Premium Management Culture Debt
Simmons Lab Case The Situation: Newbridge‚ a recently hired project head manager‚ meets Zaph at the lab one day. Zaph was an intelligent capable person‚ who had impressed Dr. Jerrold‚ the head of the laboratory. Zaph had many ideas and solutions to the different problems the lab was dealing with. Zaph immediately connected with Links‚ the mathematician‚ and started helping him with his theories‚ which Newbridge did not understand very well. Zaph’s dominant personality became apparent to Newbridge
Premium Problem solving Communication Project management
The main focus point and argument regarding both the Stanford v. Kentucky and Roper v. Simmons case rely mainly on the eight amendment. Throughout both cases‚ the eighth amendment played a key factor in determining the court’s decision‚ regarding whether or not Simmons or Stanford would be facing the death penalty. Both “The Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments forbid imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were under the age of 18 when their crimes were committed.” The eighth amendment states
Premium Capital punishment Crime Roper v. Simmons
Roper v. Simmons Argued October 13‚ 2004 – Decided March 1‚ 2005 Facts In September of 1993‚ Christopher Simmons broke into the suburban St. Louis home of Shirley Crook with the intention to rob and possibly kill her. Simmons and a friend tied the victim up with duct tape and drove her to a nearby state park. At the park‚ Simmons pushed the victim‚ who was still alive‚ off of a bridge and into the Meramec River where she drowned. Simmons was 17 years old at the time of the murder. Before
Premium English-language films Crime Police
Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988‚ Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case‚ Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989)‚ divided the court which eventually rejected that
Premium Capital punishment Crime Supreme Court of the United States
The complaint accused Forest Laboratories of violating laws under the False Claims Act stating that personnel of Forest Laboratories improperly promoted Lexapro for off-label pediatric use. Forest Laboratories was accused of paying physicians to encourage them to prescribe Lexapro and other drugs created by them. Additionally‚ Forest Laboratories was accused of blocking negative publications of one of their trials and reports that individuals
Premium Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor