Short Paper In “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality” Peter Singer argues the importance of giving to those in need‚ especially as those of us in affluent nations have an overabundance of resources. In this paper‚ I will exposit Singer’s argument and explain the methods and points that he makes. Specially‚ I will show that through his assumptions and implications‚ as well as how he refutes counter arguments Singer starts out his argument by explaining the situation at hand‚ “people are dying in East
Premium Counterargument Objection Argument map
Logic: Peter Singer NAME PHI 103‚ Information Logic Instructor: NAME DATE Logic: Peter Singer An Evaluation of Singer Peter Singer questions our conception of equality as it relates to the human species and other animal species. He fundamentally argues that‚ “The principle of the equality of human beings is not a description of an alleged actual equality among humans: it is a prescription of how we should treat humans.” The statement‚ revealing Singer’s essential argument‚ also comprises
Premium Human Species Utilitarianism
Arguments of Peter Singer PHI200: Mind and Machine Instructor: April 19‚ 2013 Singer’s goal in the article “Famine‚ Affluence and Morality” is to get people to think differently about famine relief‚ charity‚ and morality. These are key issues that people need to be more aware of and act on them. People who are financially stable and well off should take more of an active role by giving more. They should feel obligated in helping those in need. There are many people suffering severely‚
Premium Poverty Wealth
I still remember the sinking feeling in my stomach just last May when I received my final grade in Pre-Calculus. After months of extra study sessions‚ meeting with tutors‚ seeking help from my classmates and teacher‚ I had earned an F for the year. I had never seen that letter on my report card before. I had poured sweat and tears into trying to grasp the material‚ and had come up short. To say that I was devastated was an understatement. How would this grade impact my future? Would I be able
Premium High school Writing Education
rabbit out of a hat. Others simply demonstrate the remarkable power of a few seminal concepts to reveal the inner workings of the real world. Most of the problems yield to solution strategies other than the ones shown‚ but these represent my own preference. At some point in time‚ I expect to post similar documents containing problems of a more advanced nature‚ but the problems here may interest physicists and students at all levels. Contents 1 Kinematics Equations 1.1 Miscellaneous Problems in
Premium Kinetic energy Force Mass
a reader or to make him/her get awestruck. In the essay‚ “ The Singer Solution to World Poverty”‚ the author Peter singer uses his appeal for the betterment of children as his weapon to make his argument seem more persuading and creates a sense of guilt in the audience. He targets the audience by telling stories that involves children’s safety which makes the reader get awestruck and provokes them. In this essay‚ Peter Singer uses two pathetic hypothetical stories influencing the reader to donate
Premium Short story Appeal Peter Singer
Hardin versus Singer Rhetorical Strategies Picture living in a community where every minute of every day you were hungry‚ under-clothed‚ and afraid death because you are poor. A world in which child dies of hunger every 5 seconds. Now imagine waking up and your biggest problem was which sweater to wear with which jeans. Even though this seems hard to imagine‚ this life of poverty has been a reality for most people for ages. Before the1900s‚ few wealthy people would ever think about poverty. Two
Premium Rhetoric Poverty Ethics
basic human need which commonly includes nutrition‚ healthcare‚ education‚ clothing‚ shelter‚ and clean water. Peter Singer‚ author of ’The Singer Solution to World Poverty’‚ suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do‚ however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias‚ and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable
Premium Poverty Poverty in the United States Human
You would think that based on what I have heard from my peers that they are very uncomfortable with the Peter Singers ideas on donating all money beyond what they need to charity. Although they did think that it was a good idea‚ they didn’t necessarily believe that it was a moral decision. Of the arguments that I heard against Singer‚ and I did hear many‚ I don’t think that they are created equal. I’ll mention three in detail and some justifications that I heard that aren’t as relevant. First‚ Zach
Premium Thought Friedrich Nietzsche Idea
expressed beliefs‚ hence making his position somewhat illogical and not as convincing. For instance‚ Singer supposes that "the basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires equal consideration." Later he follows this idea by asserting that "equal consideration for different beings may lead to different treatment and different rights." Naturally‚ my question to Singer would be‚ what is the use of hypothetically applying "equal consideration" towards all species‚
Premium Human Mammal